Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
748.0 LFGLALNA CH

Art. 92 Bundesgesetz vom 21. Dezember 1948 über die Luftfahrt (LFG)

LFG; Zweiter Teil: Rechtsbeziehungen aus dem Betrieb der Luftfahrt; Fünfter Titel: Strafbestimmungen; Erster Abschnitt: Strafbare Handlungen; III. Administrative Massnahmen; 1. Im allgemeinen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (184 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 92 LFG

Bei der Verletzung der Bestimmungen dieses Gesetzes oder der von den zuständigen Behörden gestützt darauf erlassenen Verordnungen und weiteren Vorschriften oder der Bestimmungen einer zwischenstaatlichen Vereinbarung über die Luftfahrt kann das BAZL, unabhängig von der Einleitung und vom Ausgang eines allfälligen Strafverfahrens, folgende Massnahmen verfügen: a. den zeitweiligen oder dauernden Entzug oder eine Einschränkung des Geltungsbereiches von erteilten Bewilligungen, Erlaubnissen und Ausweisen; b. die Beschlagnahme von Luftfahrzeugen, deren weiterer Gebrauch die öffentliche Sicherheit gefährden würde oder deren missbräuchliche Verwendung zu befürchten ist.

← Art. 91bis LFG Bundesgesetz vom 21. Dezember 1948 über die Luftfahrt (LFG) Art. 93 LFG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (487)

PE.2025.0145 · vd (Art. 92 ss de la loi sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD))
Foreign Student Permit Extension Refusal for Unrelated Study Field
Cited in the reasoning, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders, therefore excluded based on the rule.
PS.2025.0011 · vd (art. 92 ss de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD))
Disability Recipient Fails to Justify Refusal of In-Person Social Assistance Meetings
Cited as the basis for the admissibility of the administrative law appeal before the Cantonal Tribunal.
PE.2025.0102 · vd (Art. 92 ss de la loi sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; BLV 173.36))
Family Appeal of Residence Refusal and Removal Order Based on Child's Health Condition
Cited as the basis for the admissibility of the administrative appeal before the Cantonal Tribunal.
GE.2025.0164 · vd (art. 95, 92 et 79 de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD :BLV 173.36))
Student Exclusion Annulled Over Post-Exam Force Majeure Ruling
Cited in the reasoning section regarding admissibility, but the actual disposition orders rely on other grounds/consequences.
CR.2025.0021 · vd (art. 92, 95 et 79, applicable par renvoi de l'art. 99, de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; BLV 173.36))
License Suspension Appeal Barred by Prior Acceptance of Administrative Penalty
Cited in the reasoning related to the procedural admissibility of the appeal.
PS.2025.0050 · vd (Art. 92 ss de la loi sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; BLV 173.36))
Child Support Advance Reimbursement for Failure to Report Cohabitation
Cited as the legal framework under which the administrative appeal was admissible.
CR.2025.0024 · vd (art. 92, 95, 96 al. 1 let. a et 79, applicable par renvoi de l'art. 99, de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD))
Motorist License Withdrawal Upheld Based on Criminal Conviction Findings
Cited in the reasoning to establish the admissibility of the appeal based on procedural requirements under cantonal administrative procedure law.
GE.2025.0013 · vd (art. 92 ss de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA‑VD))
Company Barred from COVID-19 Aid for Period of Punitive Closure; Subsidy Interest Excluded
This provision defines the admissibility of the administrative appeal to the Administrative Court.
AC.2025.0133 · vd (art. 92 ss de la loi sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; BLV 173.36))
Agricultural Building Permit Denial for Remote Hangar Location
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the admissibility of the administrative review appeal, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders I-V.
GE.2025.0023 · vd (Art. 92 al. 1 de la loi vaudoise du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; BLV 173.36))
Applicant Appeals Denial of Long-Term Legal Aid for Criminal Complaint Against Allergist
Cited as the basis for the Tribunal cantonal's jurisdiction over the appeal against administrative decisions.
GE.2025.0075 · vd (art. 92 de la loi vaudoise du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; RSV 173.36))
Apprentice Failed Logistics Certification Exam Appeal Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning section as establishing the appealability of the decision, though not in the final orders, it is mentioned in the context of procedural admissibility which is then confirmed in the orders regarding the rejection.
GE.2025.0169 · vd (art. 92, 95 et 79, applicable par renvoi de l'art. 99 de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; BLV 173.36))
Appellant v. University Review Commission (CRUL) Regarding Untimely Appeal
These articles were cited to establish the admissibility of the administrative appeal before the Cantonal Court.
AC.2025.0068 · vd (art. 92 ss de la loi sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; BLV 173.36))
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Essential Terrace Addition Outside Building Zone
Cited to confirm that the administrative review path via the Cantonal Tribunal was the correct procedure for challenging the building permit refusal.
PE.2024.0185 · vd (art. 92 ss de la loi vaudoise du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD))
Kosovar National Deportation Upheld Despite Long Illegal Stay
Cited as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal against the administrative decision.
PE.2024.0189 · vd (art. 92 de la loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative (LPA-VD; BLV 173.36))
Revocation of Residence Permit After Short-Term Separation from EU Spouse
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for opening the appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal (although not explicitly in the final orders, it is cited early in the procedure consideration and relevant to the jurisdiction that leads to the final decision structure, but since the strict rule is dispositive only, this might be borderline. However, standard practice often includes procedural basis if it structures the decision path).