Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
745.2 BGSTLOSTLFSI CH

Art. 9 Bundesgesetz vom 18. Juni 2010 über die Sicherheitsorgane der Transportunternehmen im öffentlichen Verkehr (BGST) - Ungehorsam

BGST
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (12 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 9 BGST · Ungehorsam

Wer Anordnungen einer erkennbar mit Sicherheitsaufgaben betrauten Person zuwiderhandelt, wird mit Busse bis 10 000 Franken bestraft.

Die Verfolgung und Beurteilung solcher Verstösse ist Sache der Kantone.

← Art. 8 BGST Bundesgesetz vom 18. Juni 2010 über die Sicherheitsorgane der Transportunternehmen im öffentlichen Verkehr (BGST) - Gegenstand und Geltungsbereich Art. 10 BGST →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (19)

SU230052 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Appellant v. State: COVID-19 Non-Compliance and Refusal of Identification
This provision establishes the substantive basis for the conviction regarding failure to comply with orders, upheld in the final order (Order 1).
SU230008 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Individual fined for violating mask mandate and disregarding security.
Basis for holding the accused guilty of not complying with the orders of security personnel.
SU220010 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Disobedience to Security Officer Conviction Affirmed Due to Insufficient Proof of Mask Exemption
This is the substantive legal provision under which the defendant was found guilty of disobedience.
SU220056 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 des Bundesgesetzes über die Sicherheitsorgane der Transportunternehmen im öffentlichen Verkehr (SR 745.2; BGST))
Appellant v. Train Security Personnel on Mask Violation and Non-Compliance
The appellant was convicted for disregarding orders from transport security personnel under this provision.
SK 2022 110 · be (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Refusal to Show Mask Exemption to Public Transport Security Personnel
This provision defines the offense (violation of ordinance of security personnel) for which the appellant was convicted.
SK 2021 433 · be (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Swiss Man Fined for Refusing Mask Mandate from Security Staff, Acquitted for Refusal to Train Conductor
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for the conviction regarding the violation of the provisions of the Transportation Security Act.
SK 2022 175 · be (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Refusal to Wear Mask and Blocking Train Doors on Public Transport
Cited in the dispositive as part of the legal basis for the conviction regarding violation of the law on security organs of public transport companies.
SU220007 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Violation of Public Transport Security Law and State of Necessity Defense Rejection
The defendant was found guilty of violating this article, which serves as the main ground for the final judgment.
SK 2021 516 · be (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Federal Public Transport Security Act Violation Upheld for Mask Refusal
This article establishes the criminal offense for which the appellant was convicted.
SU210044 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Appellant v. State: Validity of Mask Mandate Fine Under Legality Principle
This provision establishes the basis for finding the appellant guilty of failing to comply with an order from security personnel, as cited in order 1.
SU210034 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST in Verbindung mit Art. 4 Abs. 1 lit. a und b BGST)
COVID-19 Mask Mandate and Security Order Violation Upheld
This provision is cited as the basis for the guilty verdict regarding the disregard of orders from railway/security personnel.
SK 2020 116 · be (art. 9 LOST)
Swiss Supreme Court Upholds Convictions for Recurrent Minor Offenses Despite Mental Illness Defense
Cited in the dispositive (B.I.) as the legal basis for recognizing guilt for disobedience (applies to 6 in B.I.I.6).
SU210034 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST in Verbindung mit Art. 4 Abs. 1 lit. a und b BGST)
Appeal Against Conviction for Mask Violation and Disobeying Railway Security
This provision establishes the guilt for defying orders from train/security personnel, which is the second part of the affirmed conviction.
SU210044 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Defendant Fined for Violating COVID-19 Mask Mandates on Public Transport
Cited as the legal basis for the conviction of failing to comply with orders from security personnel.
SU220007 · zh (Art. 9 Abs. 1 BGST)
Disobedience to Security Personnel Regarding Mask Mandate in Public Transport
The main ground for upholding the previous judgment, convicting the accused of contravening this provision.