745.1 PBGLTV

CH

Art. 36 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 2009 über die Personenbeförderung (PBG) - Reserven

PBG

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (104 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 36 PBG · Reserven

Das Unternehmen muss die Hälfte des Gewinns aus den von Bund und Kantonen gemeinsam bestellten Angeboten, die nicht nach Artikel 32 ausgeschrieben wurden, und aus den bestellten Verbesserungen dieser Angebote einer Spezialreserve zuweisen. Es darf die Spezialreserve nur zur Deckung von Verlusten der von Bund und Kantonen gemeinsam bestellten Angebote verwenden.

Das Unternehmen kann Gewinne aus den vom Bund nicht mitbestellten Angeboten der konzessionierten Personenbeförderung einer Reserve zuweisen. Es darf diese Reserve nur zur Deckung von Verlusten der vom Bund nicht mitbestellten Angebote der konzessionierten Personenbeförderung verwenden. Die bestellenden Kantone können verlangen, dass maximal die Hälfte der entsprechenden Gewinne dieser Reserve zugewiesen werden muss .

Endet das von Bund und Kantonen gemeinsam bestellte Angebot, so überträgt das Unternehmen den Bestand der Spezialreserve gegebenenfalls auf die Reserve nach Absatz 2. Beendet das Unternehmen die konzessionierte Personenbeförderung, so überträgt es alle Reserven nach den Absätzen 1 und 2 auf die gesetzliche Kapitalreserve nach Artikel 671 des Obligationenrechts (OR) .

Der gesetzlichen Kapitalreserve dürfen nur Gewinne zugewiesen werden, die nach der Zuweisung an die Reserven nach den Absätzen 1 und 2 verbleiben.

← Art. 35a PBG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 2009 über die Personenbeförderung (PBG) - Geltungsbereich Art. 37 PBG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)

VB.2006.00133 · zh (§ 36 PBG)

Judicial Review of Municipal Zoning for Golf Course Development

Used to reject the appeal and uphold the decision.

VB.2002.00249 · zh (§ 36 PBG)

Zoning Reversal Upheld After Subsequent Planning Approval

This provision is the basis for the decision to grant the appeal and remit the case to the BRK, as the original ground for annulment (non-conformity with higher planning laws) is now resolved.

VWBES.2003.139 · so (§ 36 PBG)

Terraced Housing Protection Appeal Overruled Due to Planning Interests

This provision mandates that municipalities designate zones for townscapes, historical sites, and cultural monuments as part of their spatial planning.

VB.2002.00249 · zh (§ 36 PBG)

Municipal Zoning Appeal Regarding Golf Course Designation and Mootness

The appeal was granted and the matter was remanded because the ground for the previous annulment (non-conformity with higher planning decisions) no longer existed.

7H 22 36 7H 22 37 · lu (§ 36 Abs. 1 PBG)

City Rezoning of Dreilindenpark Upheld

One of the grounds for appeal challenged the zoning measure as a violation of planning duty under § 36 Abs. 1 PBG, but the court ultimately upheld the planning measure.

B.2022.40 · sg (Art. 36 Abs. 1 Ingress und lit. c PBG)

Special Use Plan Approval Upheld Despite Tree Removal and Zoning Deviations near Cultural Monument

This provision was cited in the context of the intertemporal law regarding the optional referendum for special use plans that entail a substantive change to the zoning plan.

Arr.t.2022.224 · vd (art. 36 LTV)

Public Transport Company Unemployment Compensation Denial

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the mandatory reserve for uncovered deficits in regional passenger transport, relevant to the financial context.

Arr.t.2022.241 · vd (Art. 36 LTV)

Railway Company's Short-Time Work Compensation Appeal Denied Due to Public Service Mandate Coverage

This article, concerning the use of reserves, was mentioned in the reasoning but not cited in the dispositive orders (I, II, or III).

ACH.36.21.145.2021 · vd (art. 36 LTV)

Public Transport Company Unemployment Benefits Denial for Reduced Hours

Cited during the reasoning regarding the mandatory reserve for covering future deficits in regional public transport, relevant to the cost coverage assessment.

7H 19 213 · lu (§ 36 Abs. 2 Ziff. 3 PBG)

Owner Must Retroactively Apply for Window Replacement in Protected Zone

This cantonal provision is cited as the basis for the authority of municipalities to include design provisions in their zoning regulations, which underpins the requirement for a subsequent building application regarding design aspects.

BV.2019.48 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 PBG)

Appellant challenges BFE fine for unauthorized network data use, disclosure, and disciplinary proceedings.

This provision relates to the appeal of employer decisions under the BPG and BPV to the Federal Administrative Court, establishing the lack of jurisdiction of the criminal court on this matter.

VWBES.2016.406 · so (§ 36 PBG)

Property Owners v. Cantonal Government (Landscape Protection Zone Relocation Dispute)

Cited as the cantonal equivalent provision regarding protection zones.

7R 16 1 · lu (§ 36 Abs. 2 Ziff. 11 PBG)

Judicial Review of Municipal Parking Fee Regulation Upheld Against Claims of Unconstitutionality

Cited in the reasoning as a potential legal basis for the municipal regulation concerning the coordination of settlement and traffic.

7H 14 341 · lu (§ 36 PBG)

Tourism Zone Designation Upheld Against Economic Freedom Challenge

Cited as the cantonal law empowering the municipality to issue specific building and use regulations for designated zones.

V 13 46 · lu (§ 36 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 PBG)

Cantonal Court Upholds Refusal of Commercial Building Permit Due to Zoning Violations and Insufficient Demolition Justification

Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for minimum number of storeys, although not directly applied in the final order which dismissed the appeal based on other grounds.