745.1
PBGLTV
CH
CH
Art. 30 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 2009 über die Personenbeförderung (PBG) - Finanzielle Aufteilung
PBG
Art. 30 PBG · Finanzielle Aufteilung
Der Anteil des Bundes an der gesamten Abgeltung der durch Bund und Kantone gemeinsam bestellten Angebote im regionalen Personenverkehr beträgt 50 Prozent.
Der Bundesrat legt mindestens alle vier Jahre die Anteile des Bundes und der einzelnen Kantone an der Abgeltung fest. Er hört vorher die Kantone an und berücksichtigt ihre strukturellen Voraussetzungen.
Er regelt die maximale zwischenzeitliche Abweichung vom Bundesanteil nach Absatz 1.
Sind an einer Linie mehrere Kantone finanziell beteiligt, so bemessen sich ihre Anteile, soweit keine andere Übereinkunft getroffen wird, nach der Verkehrsbedienung der Stationen und der Linienlänge (Betriebslänge) auf ihrem Gebiet.
Die Kantone bestimmen, ob Gemeinden oder andere Körperschaften an der Abgeltung beteiligt werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (11)
VWBES.2003.296 · so (§ 30 PBG)
Cross Permit Denial Upheld Due to Zoning and Ideological Nuisance
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for non-disturbing businesses in residential zones to adapt to the local construction style, which is relevant to the final decision on conformity.
ZZ.1994.35 · so (§ 30 PBG)
Administrative Rejection of Auto Repair Permit Upheld Due to Zoning Incompatibility and Unprotected New Business Use
This provision defines which commercial activities are permitted in residential zones, forming the main ground for denying the conformity of the car repair shop.
VWBES.2024.29 · so (§ 30 PBG)
Neighbors v. Building Permit for Chicken Coop with Rooster
Used to determine the permitted uses within the residential zone regarding non-disturbing commercial/service operations.
B.2022.53 · sg (Art. 30 PBG)
Appeal Dismissed Against Building Permit Denial Due to Railway Setback Violation
Cited as the provision allowing constructions within setback areas if they do not contradict the purpose of the setback line, relevant to the parking space issue.
B.2022.53 · sg (Art. 30 PBG)
Building Permit Rejection Upheld Due to Railway Setback Violation
Cited as the legal provision stating that constructions within the setback area are permissible if they do not contradict the purpose of the building line, relevant context for the overall rejection based on the setback rules.
Arr.t.2022.224 · vd (art. 30 LTV)
Public Transport Company Unemployment Compensation Denial
Cited in the reasoning section relating to the cost-sharing key for regional passenger transport indemnification, relevant to the financial context of the decision.
III 2018 198 · sz (§ 30 Abs. 5 PBG)
Shopping Center Zoning Plan Appeal and Parking Fee Dispute
Mentioned regarding the binding nature of development plans upon government council approval, although not explicitly cited in the final orders.
7H 18 141 · lu (§ 30 Abs. 1 PBG)
Denial of Retroactive Permit for Shed Violating Development Plan Building Lines Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to define the purpose of building lines (Baulinien), which formed the core of the dispute regarding the structure's placement.
7H 18 141 · lu (§ 30 Abs. 4 PBG)
Denial of Retroactive Permit for Shed Violating Development Plan Building Lines Upheld
Cited in the reasoning as the rule stating that building lines take precedence over all other public-law distance regulations.
ZZ.1994.36 · so (§ 30 PBG)
Crane Height and Scale Violate Residential Zone Character
The provision was used to determine that the crane installation in the residential zone was not zone-compliant because it did not constitute a non-disturbing business adapted to the zone's structure.
VB.2012.00713 · zh (§ 30 Abs. IV lit. a PBG)
Municipality Appeal of Regional Traffic Plan for Park+Ride Facilities
This provision is cited in the 'Rechtsnormen' section, indicating its relevance to the overall legal framework.