742.412 RSD

CH

Art. 5 Verordnung vom 31. Oktober 2012 über die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter mit Eisenbahnen und Seilbahnen (RSD) - Ausnahmen und Abweichungen

RSD

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (13 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 5 RSD · Ausnahmen und Abweichungen

Ausnahmen und Abweichungen vom RID und weitere Vorschriften, die nur für den nationalen Verkehr gelten, sind für Eisenbahnen in Anhang 2.1 und für Seilbahnen in Anhang 2.2 geregelt.

Das Eidgenössische Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation (UVEK) kann die Anhänge 2.1 und 2.2 neuen Verhältnissen anpassen.

Das BAV kann mit zuständigen Behörden anderer RID-Vertragsstaaten zeitweilige Abweichungen nach Abschnitt 1.5.1 RID vereinbaren.

Es kann in Einzelfällen Ausnahmen von dieser Verordnung gestatten, wenn deren Zweck gewahrt bleibt.

Ersucht der Gesuchsteller um eine Ausnahme oder Abweichung von Vorschriften zur Klassifizierung von Gefahrgütern nach Teil 2 RID, so muss er zusammen mit dem Gesuch einen Sachverständigenprüfbericht einreichen. Dieser muss von Sachverständigen erstellt werden, die die Anforderungen nach Anhang 3 der Gefahrgutumschliessungsverordnung vom 31. Oktober 2012 erfüllen.

← Art. 4 RSD Verordnung vom 31. Oktober 2012 über die Beförderung gefährlicher Güter mit Eisenbahnen und Seilbahnen (RSD) - Gegenstand und Geltungsbereich Art. 6 RSD →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (13)

37----------- · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 RSD)

Appeal Regarding Postponement of Prison Sentence and Semi-Detention Request Due to Expulsion Order

Cited in the reasoning section while discussing the specific requirements for semi-detention according to the Concordat Regulation.

D.cision.2022.90 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 RSD)

Appeal of Denial of Semi-Detention Based on Extensive Criminal History

The court confirmed the decision, which was based on the requirements for semi-detention set out in this regulation.

D.cision.2022.76 · vd (art. 5 RSD)

Revocation of Semi-Detention Due to New Criminal Investigation

The court found no error in the authority's assessment that the risk of recidivism, based on prior convictions and the new investigation, opposed the execution of the sentences under the semi-detention regime.

D.cision.2022.62 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 RSD)

Appeal Against Denial of Semi-Detention for Forgery Convict

This article lists specific requirements for granting semi-detention, which the court found the appellant failed to meet (specifically requirement g).

D.cision.2022.33 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 let. f RSD)

Appeal of Denial of Semi-Detention Based on Insufficient Proof of Required Weekly Hours

This provision, cited alongside Art. 77b CP, stipulates the requirement of an activity rate of at least 20 hours per week for semi-detention, which the court found was not satisfied.

D.cision.2022.33 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 let. g RSD)

Appeal of Denial of Semi-Detention Based on Insufficient Proof of Required Weekly Hours

This provision was cited as grounds for rejecting the appeal because the appellant's insufficient collaboration did not guarantee adherence to the framework conditions of semi-detention.

D.cision.2022.30 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 let. f RSD)

Appeal Against Revocation of Semi-Detention Status for Failure to Document Minimum Weekly Activity

This article, specifying the requirement to pursue an activity of at least 20 hours per week for semi-detention, was cited by the lower authority as a condition the appellant failed to meet.

D.cision.2020.1014 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 let. f RSD)

Judicial Review of Denial of Alternative Sentence Execution Based on Lack of Regular Activity

Cited as a complementary cantonal requirement for semi-detention, which the court ultimately upheld the refusal of.

D.cision.2020.91 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 RSD)

Appeal Denied: Failure to Prove Required Work Hours for Semi-Detention

Cited in the reasoning to explain the personal conditions for semi-detention, relating to the principal issue.

D.cision.2019.835 · vd (Art. 5 RSD)

Appeal Against Denial of Semi-Detention Due to History of Non-Compliance

This article outlines specific conditions for semi-detention which the court considered in rejecting the appeal.

D.cision.2018.560 · vd (Art. 5 al. 1 RSD)

Appellant v. Execution Office Regarding Semi-Detention Denial

This provision, detailing the personal conditions for semi-detention, was cited in the reasoning concerning the admission of the appeal's grounds, confirming the fulfillment of conditions other than the activity rate.

D.cision.2018.47 · vd (art. 5 al. 1 let. f RSD)

Appeal Regarding Denial of Semi-Detention Due to Insufficient Documentation of Work Activity

This provision was cited in the reasoning concerning the requirements for semi-detention (employment rate) but was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

53.2005.21 · ti (Art. 5 cpv. 1 del regolamento sulle supplenze dei docenti (RSD))

Substitute Teacher Compensation for Meal Supervision Discrimination

The specific text of the regulation whose discriminatory nature was assessed in consideration 3.1, leading to the decision in order 13.