741.21 SSVOSROSSTR

CH

Art. 106 Signalisationsverordnung (SSV) - Einsprache

SSV; 14. Kapitel: Allgemeine Anforderungen an die Strassensignalisation

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (136 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 106 SSV · Einsprache

Die Einsprache ist zulässig: a. gegen Signalisationen und Markierungen, die den Vorschriften nicht entsprechen, namentlich wenn nicht vorgesehene Signale oder Markierungen verwendet werden, wenn Signale oder Markierungen unnötigerweise angebracht werden oder fehlen, wo sie notwendig sind; b. gegen Signale, die nach Artikel 107 Absätze 1, 3 und 4 weder verfügt noch veröffentlicht werden müssen, sowie gegen Markierungen, soweit die Verletzung der rechtlichen Voraussetzungen für ihre Anbringung gerügt wird. Die Einsprache ist ausgeschlossen gegen Signale und Markierungen, deren Anbringung vom Bund angeordnet oder bewilligt wird (Art. 104 Abs. 3 und 4; Art. 13 Abs. 2 SDR in Verbindung mit Art. 19 Abs. 1 Bst. g und h).

...

← Art. 105 SSV Signalisationsverordnung (SSV) - Inhalt, Abkürzungen und Begriffe Art. 107 SSV →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (24)

VVGE.1997.98.Nr.22 · ow (Art. 106 SSV)

Parking Fee Legality and Legal Basis Determination

Mentioned as the article under which objections can be raised against the placement of signals, but not for the fee itself.

VWBES.2024.236 · so (Art. 106 Abs. 1 lit. a SSV)

Property Owner v. Local Council Regarding Traffic Measures and Access Restriction

Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.1, 2.2) as the legal basis for the initial objection concerning the required road markings.

WBE.2024.320 · ag (Art. 106 lit. a SSV)

Cul-de-sac Parking Prohibition Upheld

This provision is cited to indicate that an objection (Einsprache) is permissible against non-compliant markings of traffic signs and lines.

V 2020 15 · zg (Art. 106 Abs. 1 SSV)

Appeal Against Municipal Traffic Order Establishing Core Lane Dismissed

This article, concerning the possibility of filing an objection (Einsprache), is discussed extensively, leading to the conclusion that the appellant's submission does not qualify as such (point 3.2).

VB.2017.00657 · zh (Art. 106 SSV)

Appeal Against Removal of Pedestrian Crossing Referred to Cantonal Police

Used to determine the correct procedure for appealing markings and signals that can be ordered without publication.

BRGE.II.Nr.0125.201 · zh (Art. 106 Abs. 1 SSV)

Appeal Regarding Speed Limit Reduction Jurisdiction Transfer

Cited in connection with § 31 KSigV to establish the possibility of appealing functional traffic restrictions to the competent authority (Kantonspolizei, and subsequently Sicherheitsdirektion).

603 2013 1 · fr (art. 106 OSR)

Administrative Court Upholds Traffic Modifications While Reclassifying Separate Bicycle Lane Challenge

The part of the appeal concerning the establishment of a cycle lane on Route Ste-Thérèse is transmitted to the DAEC as a request under this article.

U 2011 74 · gr (Art. 106 cpv. 1 lett. a OSStr)

Administrative Dispute Regarding Traffic Sign Installation at Road Intersection

Cited in the reasoning to define the grounds for opposition against signage (linked to the decision on the signage itself).

52.2006.53 · ti (art. 106 OSStr)

Resident v. Local Authority on Traffic Restrictions and Land Use Plan Compliance

Cited in the 'Per questi motivi' section, relevant for the overall legal framework, but not the direct ground for the specific orders.

52.2002.479 · ti (art. 106 OSStr)

Appeals Court Overrules Conditional Traffic Reversal Based on Unrelated Speed Limit Ruling

Cited in the preamble to the orders, relevant to the substantive traffic regulation issue decided.

GE.1999.0150 · vd (art. 106 al. 2 OSR)

Vineyard Signage Dispute: Retention of Existing Signs Granted, New Sign Denied

Cited in the final communication regarding the possibility of filing an appeal against the administrative decision.

GE.1997.0150 · vd (Art. 106 OSR)

Pedestrian Signal Configuration and Negative Priority Conflict

Cited as the formal basis for lodging the appeal concerning the traffic signals.

GE.1997.0150 · vd (Art. 106 al. 2 OSR)

Pedestrian Signal Configuration and Negative Priority Conflict

Cited to establish that the municipal decision could be appealed to the administrative court.

JAAC 63.55 (Art. 106 Abs. 1 Bst. a SSV)

Traffic Order Appeal: Construction Measures Not Functional Traffic Measures

Discussed and dismissed as irrelevant for the current appeal concerning the legal basis for imposing traffic measures.

GE.1996.0079 · vd (art. 106 OSR)

Municipality v. Cantonal Department Regarding Traffic Signage and Speed Limit

Cited in the reasoning when discussing the municipality's right to initiate action, but not used in the operative orders.