Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
741.11 VRVOCRONC CH

Art. 40 Verkehrsregelnverordnung (VRV) - Radwege und Radstreifen

VRV; 1. Teil: Regeln für den Fahrverkehr; 4. Abschnitt: Besondere Strassenverhältnisse
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (116 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 40 VRV · Radwege und Radstreifen

Die Radfahrer haben den Vortritt zu gewähren, wenn sie aus einem Radweg oder Radstreifen auf die anliegende Fahrbahn fahren und wenn sie beim Überholen den Radstreifen verlassen.

Fussgänger dürfen Radwege benützen, wo Trottoir und Fussweg fehlen.

Führer anderer Fahrzeuge dürfen auf dem mit einer unterbrochenen Linie abgegrenzten Radstreifen (6.09) fahren, sofern sie den Fahrradverkehr dadurch nicht behindern.

Ausserhalb von Verzweigungen, z.B. bei Einfahrten zu Liegenschaften, müssen Führer anderer Fahrzeuge beim Überqueren von Radwegen oder Radstreifen den Radfahrern den Vortritt lassen.

Verläuft ein Radweg in einem Abstand von nicht mehr als 2 m entlang einer Fahrbahn für den Motorfahrzeugverkehr, gelten bei Verzweigungen für die Radfahrer die gleichen Vortrittsregeln wie für die Fahrzeugführer der anliegenden Fahrbahn. Die Motorfahrzeugführer der anliegenden Fahrbahn haben beim Abbiegen den Radfahrern den Vortritt zu gewähren.

← Art. 39 VRV Verkehrsregelnverordnung (VRV) - Begriffe Art. 41 VRV →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)

SK 2021 96 · be (Art. 40 Abs. 3 VRV)
Appeal of Conviction for Drunken Driving, Traffic Violations, and Insulting Police Officers
Cited as the specific regulation detailing rules regarding driving on delimited bike lanes.
RRB.Nr.2021.000820 · ag (Art. 40 Abs. 3 VRV)
Property Owner Fined for Blocking Bike Lane for Deliveries
Cited in conjunction with Art. 37 Abs. 2 SVG as the legal basis for prohibiting the blocking of the cycle path with trucks for goods handling.
B.2016.163 · sg (Art. 40 Abs. 5 VRV)
Driver's License Suspension Upheld for Failure to Yield Resulting in Collision
Cited in the reasoning section (3.3) to establish the violation committed by the appellant, which is the basis for maintaining the license withdrawal.
B.2016.163 · sg (Art. 40 Abs. 5 VRV)
License Suspension Upheld for Failure to Yield to Moped on Bike Path
Cited in the reasoning as the specific traffic rule violated (regarding priority for cyclists/moped riders on paths adjacent to the road when turning right).
SK 2016 424 · be (Art. 40 Abs. 4 VRV)
Cantonal High Court Upholds Traffic Violation Conviction Despite Procedural Delays and Statute of Limitations Argument
Cited in the dispositive regarding the conviction for failing to yield when crossing bicycle lanes.
IV.2016.128 · sg (Art. 40 Abs. 4 VRV)
Driver License Suspension Upheld for Failing to Yield to Cyclist
This provision was cited as part of the traffic rule violated by the appellant regarding yielding the right of way when crossing cycle paths.
IV.2016.128 · sg (Art. 40 Abs. 4 VRV)
Motorist's Failure to Stop Resulting in Cyclist Injury Upheld License Suspension
This provision was cited as one of the traffic rules violated by the appellant regarding yielding right of way to cyclists when crossing bike paths.
IV.2016.42 · sg (Art. 40 Abs. 5 VRV)
Administrative Appeal Commission Upholds License Revocation for Medium-Severity Traffic Violation
The court referenced this provision regarding the duty to grant right of way to bicycle and moped traffic when turning across a bike path.
17.2011.78 · ti (art. 40 cpv. 4 ONC)
Traffic Violation Appeal Regarding Duty to Yield to Bike Lane Traffic
Cited in the final orders as the relevant rule concerning priority for cyclists/moped riders crossing a cycle path.
BK 2005 44 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 3 VRV)
Appeal Dismissed: Collision Liability in Left Turn Incident
Cited in reasoning section 5.bb regarding the permission for motor vehicles to use cycle lanes when not hindering bicycle traffic.
CCP.2001.148 · ne (Art. 40 OCR)
Traffic Conviction Appeal Regarding Right Turn and Failure to Yield
Cited in the reasoning concerning the inapplicability of paragraph 5 of this article to a cycle lane situation, and in relation to the general priority rules.
CCP.2001.148 · ne (Art. 40 al.1 OCR)
Traffic Conviction Appeal Regarding Right Turn and Failure to Yield
Mentioned in the reasoning concerning the charges dropped against C., but not used in the final orders.
CCP.2001.148 · ne (Art. 40 al.4 OCR)
Traffic Conviction Appeal Regarding Right Turn and Failure to Yield
Cited in the reasoning when analyzing the argument that cyclists on a cycle lane should have priority.
CCP.2001.148 · ne (Art. 40 al.5 OCR)
Traffic Conviction Appeal Regarding Right Turn and Failure to Yield
Cited in the reasoning as incorrectly applied by the lower court to the cycle lane situation.
AC.1992.0124 · vd (art. 40 al. 3 OCR)
Association des Habitants de la Rue Cordey et Autres v. Departmental Decisions on Avenue Renovation and Roundabout Construction
Cited regarding the possibility of driving on cycle lanes when necessary, supporting a potential project correction.