Art. 66 Strassenverkehrsgesetz (SVG)

VB.2020.00648 · zh (Art. 66 Abs. 1 SVG)

Appeal Against Refusal to Retroactively Black Out Personal Data in Commercial Register Document

This provision was cited in the dispositive concerning the allocation of court costs.

SK 2008 412 · be (Art. 66 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 67 Abs. 4 SVG)

Qualified Drunk Driving Fine Based on Hypothetical Asset Yield

This provision is implicitly the basis for the orders regarding costs, as the final decision orders the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal.

CR.2002.0244 · vd (art. 66 LCR)

Driver License Suspension Upheld for Excessive Speeding

This provision is mentioned in the final sentence regarding the possibility of appealing to the Federal Tribunal regarding costs (though the provision for costs in the dispositive is not explicitly numbered, the final sentence implies adherence to appeal provisions).

CR.2002.0129 · vd (art. 66 LCR)

Angolan Permit Forgery Driving Ban Appeal

While the text mentions Art. 24 al. 2 and Art. 6 LCR in the context of the possibility of appeal to the Federal Tribunal, Article III of the dispositive imposes court costs based on the local cost provisions which are implied by the context of the decision (Article 66 LTF is the standard cost provision in federal law, but here we must rely strictly on what is cited in the final orders). Since the cost imposition in Order III refers to the Cantonal decision, and no explicit Federal provision for costs is cited in the dispositive orders (I, II, III), and the mention of LCR in the final paragraph relates to appeal rights, only provisions directly used for the substance/procedure of the ruling are usually included unless cost articles are explicitly named in I, II, or III. Order III imposes costs based on the general procedure applicable, but without explicitly citing a procedural cost article like Art. 66 LTF, we stick to the cited substantive/procedural rules. The decision explicitly rejects the appeal (I) and confirms the prior decision (II) based on Art. 42 OAC and Art. 14 LCR. Since no explicit cost article is numbered in I, II, or III, we only include the substantive ones.)

CR.2003.0030 · vd (Art. 66 LCR (RS 741.01))

Applicant v. Licensing Authority: Issuance of Driving Instructor Permit After Successful Retraining

Cited as the basis for appeal to the Federal Tribunal (though the judgment itself does not contain cost orders, this provision is cited in the final paragraph concerning the possibility of appeal).

CR.2002.0056 · vd (Art. 66 LCR (RS 741.01))

License Suspension Mitigation Following Minor Collision

This is mentioned in the context of the conditions for filing an administrative appeal before the Federal Tribunal, but it is not cited in the dispositive orders (I, II, III).

CR.2002.0208 · vd (Art. 66 LCR)

Administrative License Revocation Overturned Due to Acquittal in Related Criminal Proceedings

This article is cited in the final paragraph regarding the possibility of an administrative appeal to the Federal Tribunal, but since the decision itself doesn't impose costs based on it, it is generally excluded unless explicitly used in the main dispositive orders (I-IV). Since it is mentioned in the final non-binding paragraph about appeal rights, it is excluded based on the rules.

CR.2002.0108 · vd (Art. 66 LCR)

Driver Appeals License Suspension for Speeding Despite Prior Offenses

This provision is cited in the final paragraph regarding the possibility of an administrative appeal to the Federal Tribunal, which implies cost implications for the losing party.

CR.2002.0178 · vd (Art. 66 LCR)

Preventative License Withdrawal Upheld for Extreme Blood Alcohol Content

Costs were imposed on the appellant as the appeal was rejected.

CR.2002.0027 · vd (art. 66 LCR)

License Withdrawal Appeal for Driving While Suspended

This article is mentioned in the final paragraph regarding the possibility of appeal to the Federal Tribunal, which is a procedural step, but it is not cited in the operative part (I, II, III).

CR.2001.0272 · vd (art. 66 LCR)

Driver Speeding Appeal Due to Unclear Signage

Cited in the final order (IV) regarding the allocation of legal costs (dépens) to the appellant.

CR.2001.0276 · vd (Art. 66 LCR)

Driver License Suspension Upheld for Speeding

Cited in the final sentence regarding the possibility of an appeal to the Federal Tribunal.

10.2006.177 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 3 LCStr)

Acquittal on Insurance/Plate Misuse, Conviction for Ordinance Contravention

This article was examined in relation to sentencing and procedural costs, although the final order does not explicitly cite it for payment allocation.