Art. 47 Strassenverkehrsgesetz (SVG)

Jug.2021.78 · vd (art. 41, 47, 49 al. 1, 63, 91 al. 2 let. a LCR, 40, 49 CP)

Endangering Life, Attempted Murder, Aggravated Drunk Driving Appeal Upheld

These provisions were cited in the preamble of the operative part but not explicitly repeated or applied in the final numbered orders (I to VIII) of the appeal decision itself, only in the confirmation of the first instance judgment (Order II). Only provisions explicitly cited in the appeal decision's operative part (I-VIII) are included. Provisions related to costs/reimbursement (Art. 135 CPP and Art. 428 CPP) were cited in the operative part.

SB.2019.63 · bs (Art. 47 Abs. 2 SVG)

Traffic Violation Appeal: Admissibility of Video Evidence and Acquittal on Certain Charges

Cited in the dispositive as the basis for conviction for not maintaining position within the convoy.

SK 2018 56 · be (Art. 47, 90 Abs. 1, 102 Abs. 1 SVG)

Cantonal Court Dismisses Property Damage Charges Due to Invalid Complaint, Upholds Minor Traffic Violation Conviction

Cited in the dispositive as the substantive articles applied for finding the accused guilty of the simple traffic offense.

SB.2016.131 · bs (Art. 47 Abs. 2 SVG)

Traffic Violation Appeal Upheld Based on Police Testimony

Cited in connection with the application of Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG for the conviction.

P/14199/2013 · ge (Art. 47 LCR)

Negligent Homicide Appeal Arising from Red Light Violation

Cited in the reasoning regarding the legal basis for awarding equitable compensation for moral damages to the victim of bodily injury.

SU150099 · zh (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG in Verbindung mit Art. 27 Abs. 1 SVG, Art. 73 Abs. 6a SSV, Art. 34 Abs. 2 SVG sowie Art. 47 Abs. 2 SVG)

Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld Despite Challenge to Police Testimony Credibility

This provision establishes the substantive finding that the defendant is guilty of multiple traffic violations.

17.2014.40 · ti (art. 47 cpv. 2 LCStr)

Appeal of Traffic Violation Dismissed on Insufficient Evidence

This provision defines the substantive violation (prohibiting motorcyclists from passing stopped vehicles in a queue) whose application was reviewed on appeal.

SK1 2011 42 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 2 SVG)

State v. Appellant (Driver Identification in Traffic Violation Appeal)

The appeal was granted and the appellant was acquitted of the charges related to this article.

17.2011.49 · ti (art. 47 cpv. 2 LCStr)

Motorcyclist Overtaking Stationary Vehicle in Congested Traffic Affirmed

This article defines the traffic offense for which the appellant was found guilty and whose conviction was confirmed.

30.2004.314 · ti (art. 47 cpv. 2 LCStr)

Appellant fined for colliding while overtaking queued vehicles.

This article establishes the substance of the traffic violation (staying put in a vehicle column) that justified upholding the original decision.

10.2004.261 · ti (Art. 47 cpv. 2 LCStr)

Negligent Homicide Following Traffic Violation and Delayed Death from Subdural Hematoma

This article on remaining in traffic queues was cited in the concluding provisions, supporting the finding of guilt.

52.2001.349 · ti (art. 47 cpv. 2 LCStr)

Driver License Revocation Upheld Despite Procedural Error in Initial Notice

Mentioned in the list of articles considered, related to traffic regulations violated.

10.2004.261 · ti (Art. 47 cpv. 2 LCStr)

Negligent Homicide Following Scooter Overtake at Crosswalk

Cited in the final list of provisions used for the decision, relating to motorcyclists remaining in line when traffic is stopped.

17.2011.49 · ti (art. 47 cpv. 2 LCStr)

Motorcyclist Violation in Overtaking Stationary Traffic Column

This provision defines the traffic violation for which the appellant was convicted and whose correct application was the subject of the appeal.

17.2014.40 · ti (art. 47 cpv. 2 LCStr)

Appellant v. Respondent: Overtaking Collision and Traffic Law Application

The substantive provision underlying the charge, which the court ultimately found not violated based on the established facts.