Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
741.01 SVGLCRLCSTR CH

Art. 40 Strassenverkehrsgesetz (SVG)

SVG; III. Titel: Verkehrsregeln; Grundregel; 2. Abschnitt: Regeln für den Fahrverkehr; III. Sicherungsvorkehren; Warnsignale
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (168 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 40 SVG

Wo die Sicherheit des Verkehrs es erfordert, hat der Fahrzeugführer die übrigen Strassenbenützer zu warnen. Unnötige und übermässige Warnsignale sind zu unterlassen. Rufzeichen mit der Warnvorrichtung sind untersagt.

← Art. 39 SVG Strassenverkehrsgesetz (SVG) Art. 41 SVG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (37)

SK 2023 239 · be (art. 40 LCR)
Qualified Drunk Driving and Obstruction Appeal Upheld Despite *In Dubio Pro Reo* Claim
Cited in the procedural context of confirming the dismissal of some charges as res judicata (Art. 402 CPP mentioned in reasoning, but Art. 40 LCR is cited in the dispositive).
SK 2022 653 · be (art. 40 LCR)
Swiss Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Reckless Driving and Bodily Harm in Tunnel Collision
Cited in the final orders (B.I. structure, referencing relevant articles for the penalty) implicitly related to the overall penalties imposed.
SB220486 · zh (Art. 40 SVG)
Traffic Violations, Overtaking Incident, and Hit-and-Run Appeal
The defendant was acquitted of the simple violation of traffic regulations concerning warning signals based on this article.
SB220026 · zh (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG i.V.m. Art. 40 SVG und Art. 29 Abs. 1 VRV)
Traffic Violation Appeal: Tailgating Conviction Upheld
The court found the appellant guilty of simple violation of traffic regulations regarding unnecessary warning signals.
SST.2021.145 · ag (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG i.V.m. Art. 40 SVG)
State v. Ramirez - Affirmation of Convictions and Sentence Adjustment
The court confirmed the conviction for traffic offense.
Jug.2021.108 · vd (art. 40 LCR)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld Despite Exclusion of Video Evidence
Cited in the application section (dispositive) as a provision violated, leading to the confirmation of the conviction for simple violation of traffic rules (related to the horn use).
STK 2019 75 · sz (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG i.V.m. Art. 40 SVG und Art. 29 Abs. 1 VRV)
Appellant v. State: Gross and Intentional Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld and Sentence Modified
The defendant was convicted of intentionally violating traffic regulations concerning unnecessary warning signals based on this provision.
SU190038 · zh (Art. 40 SVG und Art. 29 Abs. 1 VRV)
Traffic Violations and Accident Conviction Upheld on Appeal
The accused was found guilty of violating traffic regulations regarding unnecessary use of warning signals based on these provisions.
501 2019 132 · fr (art. 40 LCR)
Aggravated Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld; Sentence Reduced; Civil Claims Rejected on Standing.
Cited as one of the traffic regulations violated by the defendant, leading to the aggravated conviction.
STK 2019 61 · sz (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG i.V.m. Art. 40 SVG und Art. 29 Abs. 1 VRV)
Appellate Court Ruling on Causation in Battery and Aggravated Injury Case
The defendant was found guilty of intentional simple violation of traffic regulations through the abusive use of warning signals under these provisions.
Jug.2020.149 · vd (art. 40 LCR)
State v. Appellants (Theft, Burglary, Immigration Offenses)
Cited in the operative part concerning G.____'s conviction for traffic violations (likely art. 90 al. 1 LCR mentioned in the text, but the dispositive text lists art. 90 al. 1 LCR).
Jug.2019.330 · vd (art. 40 LCR)
Traffic Violation Appeal Affirming Conviction for Dangerous Overtaking
This provision was used to confirm the conviction for simple violation of traffic rules (unnecessary use of the horn).
72.2017.2 · ti (art. 40 LCStr)
State v. Speeding Motorcyclist
Cited in the reference list, likely relating to procedural aspects or general traffic law application.
2018.11.20.sr.1 · bl (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG (i.V.m. Art. 34 Abs. 4 SVG sowie Art. 40 SVG))
Defense Attorney Fee Appeal Barred; Mismanagement Reclassified to Disloyal Management; Speedy Trial Violation Acknowledged
Cited in the original judgment's dispositive as a basis for the conviction, and retained in the appeal court's dispositive.
SB160382 · zh (Art. 40 SVG)
Mismanagement Conviction Affirmed, Assault Acquitted, Traffic Violations Upheld
Cited in connection with Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG regarding unnecessary honking.