741.01
SVGLCRLCSTR
CH
CH
Art. 39 Strassenverkehrsgesetz (SVG)
SVG; III. Titel: Verkehrsregeln; Grundregel; 2. Abschnitt: Regeln für den Fahrverkehr; III. Sicherungsvorkehren; Zeichengebung
Art. 39 SVG
Jede Richtungsänderung ist mit dem Richtungsanzeiger oder durch deutliche Handzeichen rechtzeitig bekannt zu geben. Dies gilt namentlich für: a. das Einspuren, Wechseln des Fahrstreifens und Abbiegen; b. das Überholen und das Wenden; c. das Einfügen eines Fahrzeuges in den Verkehr und das Anhalten am Strassenrand.
Die Zeichengebung entbindet den Fahrzeugführer nicht von der gebotenen Vorsicht.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (86)
SB240434 · zh (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG in Verbindung mit Art. 39 Abs. 1 SVG und Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRV (mehrfach))
Traffic Violations and Obstruction Conviction Upheld, Sentence Reduced and Suspended
This provision confirms the defendant's guilt for multiple simple violations of traffic regulations, as cited in order 1.
SST.2024.273 · ag (Art. 39 Abs. 1 SVG)
Driver found guilty of gross violation of traffic rules for red light violation and illegal turn.
Cited as the legal basis for the conviction of failing to indicate a change of direction.
SB230492 · zh (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. a und Abs. 2 SVG)
Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence for Qualified Traffic Violation
Cited alongside Art. 90 Abs. 3 SVG to define the factual basis for the conviction regarding the violation of the speed limit.
AK.2024.106.AK · sg (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. a SVG)
Prosecutor's Discontinuance Overturned Due to Lack of Procedural Authorization and Uninvestigated Accident Circumstances
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty to signal a change of direction when turning.
ARMP.2024.63 · ne (art. 39 LCR)
Motorcyclist Injury Appeal Against Prosecutor's Case Closure Regarding Truck Overtake Accident
Cited regarding the obligation to signal intent to change direction in advance and the requirement to maintain necessary precautions.
SB230477 · zh (Art. 39 Abs. 1 SVG und Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRV)
Appeals Court Modifies Convictions for Obstructing Officials and Traffic Violations
Basis for confirming the conviction for failure to indicate direction.
603 2023 8 · fr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 SVG)
Driving License Revocation for Serious Traffic Violations and Prior Offense
Cited in the reasoning regarding the obligation to signal a change in direction.
SST.2021.267 · ag (Art. 39 Abs. 1 SVG)
Defendant Convicted of Multiple Traffic Violations, Including Driving Without a License
Cited for multiple offenses of failing to signal.
CPEN.2022.8 · ne (Art. 39 al. 1 LCR)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld for Unsafe Lane Change
This provision on signaling intent before changing direction was cited as one of the traffic rules violated by the appellant.
SB.2020.100 · bs (Art. 39 Abs. 1 SVG)
Traffic Violation Appeal Involving Cross-Cantonal Jurisdiction and Sentencing Review
Used to confirm the guilty verdict for the failure to signal a lane change as a simple traffic violation.
SB210033 · zh (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG in Verbindung mit Art. 39 Abs. 1 SVG)
Speeding Conviction Upheld; Bodily Harm Acquittal on Grounds of Doubt; Sentence Adjusted for Prior Offense
The court upheld the conviction for multiple simple traffic violations under this provision.
Jug.2021.354 · vd (Art. 39 al. 1 LCR)
Negligent Homicide Appeal Affirmed with Increased Penalties and Damages
Cited in the reasoning regarding signaling intention to change direction, but not in the final dispositive orders.
STK 2020 31 · sz (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG i.V.m. Art. 39 Abs. 1 SVG und Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRV)
State v. Appellant on Traffic Offenses and Obstruction
The conviction for intentionally violating traffic rules by failing to signal a change of direction was confirmed in the final orders (Dispositiv Ziffer 2.4).
ARMP.2020.184 · ne (Art. 39 al. LCR)
Driver v. State (Traffic Fine Reversal and Legal Fees Denial)
Mentioned in the background facts as an offense charged against X in the initial penal order.
IV.2020.118 · sg (Art. 39 Abs. 2 SVG)
License Revocation for Faulty U-Turn Maneuver
Cited in the heading, although the article's application is discussed in the reasoning (Erw. 4.d.bb) regarding signalling not relieving the driver of required caution.