Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
741.01 SVGLCRLCSTR CH

Art. 26 Strassenverkehrsgesetz (SVG)

SVG; III. Titel: Verkehrsregeln; Grundregel
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (168 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 26 SVG

Jedermann muss sich im Verkehr so verhalten, dass er andere in der ordnungsgemässen Benützung der Strasse weder behindert noch gefährdet.

Besondere Vorsicht ist geboten gegenüber Kindern, Gebrechlichen und alten Leuten, ebenso wenn Anzeichen dafür bestehen, dass sich ein Strassenbenützer nicht richtig verhalten wird.

← Art. 25h SVG Strassenverkehrsgesetz (SVG) Art. 27 SVG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (405)

ZZ.1991.24 · so (Art. 26 Abs. 2 SVG)
Driver Liability for Proceeding Through Intersection with Inoperative Traffic Signal
Basis for convicting the driver for a violation due to lack of attention in an unclear traffic situation.
P/24471/2023 · ge (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld Due to Following Too Closely
This article was cited in the dispositive of the judgment below, which was confirmed by the appeal court, regarding the general duty to behave in traffic without disturbing others.
501 2025 61 · fr (Art. 90 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 31 Abs. 1 und Art. 26 Abs. 2 SVG)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld in Roundabout Collision Case
This provision specifies the traffic rule violation for which the appeal was ultimately dismissed (confirmed conviction).
P/21046/2023 · ge (Art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Violation of Traffic Rules Causing Accident
This article enshrines the principle of trust, which was discussed extensively regarding the appellant's liability.
P/12561/2024 · ge (Art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Prosecutor's Dismissal Upheld in Negligent Bodily Harm Case Against Driver
Cited in the reasoning discussing the principle of trust derived from the rule that everyone must behave in traffic without endangering others.
A/2862/2024 · ge (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
French Driver's License Holder's 12-Month Driving Ban Upheld for Violations During Existing Ban
The court confirmed the appellant's liability for failing to behave in traffic in a way that does not impede or endanger others, specifically regarding dangerous overtaking maneuvers.
P/23712/2020 · ge (art. 26 LCR)
Truck Driver Negligence and Grievous Bodily Harm Conviction
Cited as a breached duty of prudence by the appellee.
P/3095/2024 · ge (art. 90 al. 1 LCR cum art. 26 al. 1 et art. 34 al. 3 LCR)
State v. Defendant (Traffic Violation and Collision)
This provision forms the basis for the acquittal of the defendant concerning the simple violation of traffic regulations.
P/9166/2022 · ge (Art. 26 al. 2 LCR)
Appeal of Negligence Dismissal in Cyclist Injury Case
This article regarding the obligation to not endanger others in traffic was cited in the reasoning explaining why the defendant driver was not considered negligent.
501 2023 150 · fr (art. 26 LCR)
Neighbor Dispute Conviction Upheld and Disobedience Charge Added on Appeal
Cited in order 4 of the dispositive in connection with art. 90 ch. 2 LCR regarding traffic violations.
CPEN.2023.79 · ne (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Police Tribunal Conviction Upheld on Reckless Driving, Hit-and-Run, and Threat Charges
Cited in the preamble of the orders, likely related to traffic offenses confirmed by the ruling.
SK 2023 330 · be (Art. 26 Abs. 1 SVG)
Swiss Traffic Violation Appeal Regarding Roundabout Collision
Substantive basis, cited alongside Art. 90 SVG for the conviction.
SST.2023.209 · ag (Art. 26 Abs. 2 SVG)
Driver Acquitted of Negligent Bodily Harm, Convicted of Traffic Violations and Leaving Scene, Fine Reduced Due to Trial Delay
The court uses this provision to justify the defendant's duty of care towards children, overriding the general principle of trust in traffic.
BEK 2024 47 · sz (Art. 26 Abs. 2 SVG)
Traffic Violation Acquittal Based on Indictment Specificity Regarding Known Hazard
Cited implicitly as the specific provision under which the accused could not be convicted, leading to the acquittal.
SK 2023 381 · be (Art. 26 Abs. 1 SVG)
Appellate Court Upholds Conviction for Gross Traffic Violations Following Emergency Lane Overtaking
Cited in the dispositive as a general traffic legal provision relevant to the context of the committed violations.