741.01
SVGLCRLCSTR
CH
CH
Art. 23 Strassenverkehrsgesetz (SVG)
SVG; II. Titel: Fahrzeuge und Fahrzeugführer; 3. Abschnitt: Gemeinsame Bestimmungen; Verfahren, Geltungsdauer der Massnahmen
Art. 23 SVG
Verweigerung und Entzug eines Fahrzeug- oder Führerausweises sowie das Verbot des Radfahrens oder des Führens von Tierfuhrwerken sind schriftlich zu eröffnen und zu begründen. Vor dem Entzug eines Führerausweises oder der Auflage eines Fahrverbotes ist der Betroffene in der Regel anzuhören.
Der Kanton, der Kenntnis erhält von einem Grund zu einer solchen Massnahme, kann diese dem zuständigen Kanton beantragen; ebenso dem Bund, wenn dieser zuständig ist.
Hat eine gegen einen Fahrzeugführer gerichtete Massnahme fünf Jahre gedauert, so hat die Behörde des Wohnsitzkantons auf Verlangen eine neue Verfügung zu treffen, wenn glaubhaft gemacht wird, dass die Voraussetzungen weggefallen sind. Hat der Betroffene den Wohnsitz gewechselt, so ist vor der Aufhebung der Massnahme der Kanton anzuhören, der sie verfügt hat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (155)
WBE.2024.438 · ag (Art. 23 Abs. 1 SVG)
*R v. Smith* - License Revocation Overturned Due to Insufficient Factual Investigation
Cited as the statutory basis for the right to be heard in traffic law.
A/4198/2022 · ge (art. 23 al. 3 LCR)
Cantonal Vehicle Office v. Lower Court on Driver's License Recidivism Period Calculation
Cited to confirm the minimum duration of five years for the indefinite license withdrawal pronounced under Art. 16b al. 2 let. f LCR.
VWBES.2023.66 · so (Art. 23 Abs. 1 SVG)
Driver's License Revocation Upheld Due to Confirmed Cannabis Impairment
Cited in the facts section regarding the right to be heard before the final decision.
VWBES.2023.66 · so (Art. 23 Abs. 1 SVG)
Driver's License Revocation Upheld Due to Confirmed Cannabis Impairment
Cited in the reasoning as providing the right to be heard before the MFK issues its final decision.
WBE.2022.427 · ag (Art. 23 Abs. 3 SVG)
Driver's License Permanently Revoked After Falling Garden Chair
Sets the minimum duration of five years for the revocation of the driving license and the conditions for its reissuance.
52.2022.242 · ti (Art. 23 cpv. 1 LCStr)
Motorist Appeal of Mandatory Driving Ban for Repeat Speeding Upheld
Cited in the context of the applicant's right to be heard violation, although the violation itself was deemed cured.
603 2022 2 · fr (Art. 23 Abs. 3 SVG)
Administrative Commission v. Appellant Regarding Driver's License Revocation for Speeding and Recidivism
The court referred to this provision regarding the procedure for reapplying for a license after the five-year minimum period for an indefinite revocation.
A/3135/2021 · ge (art. 23 LCR)
Appeal Against Indefinite License Revocation Due to Medical Unfitness Upheld Despite Procedural Violation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard before a license withdrawal, though ultimately the court rejected the claim based on its reparability.
VB.2021.00165 · zh (Art. 23 Abs. III SVG)
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Due to Failure to Update Address
This provision was cited in the reasoning as the basis for the administrative measure, although the final order was based on non-admission.
CR.2021.0017 · vd (art. 23 al. 3 LCR)
Appeal Regarding Indefinite License Withdrawal Upheld Despite Medication Defense
This provision was used to confirm the decision regarding the conditions for the restitution of the driving license.
IV.2020.130 · sg (Art. 23 Abs. 1 SVG)
Appeal Regarding Midrange Speeding License Withdrawal Reduction
Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirement for written opening and justification of the withdrawal decision, although not directly in the dispositive orders regarding the result.
V 2020 19 · zg (Art. 23 SVG)
License Revocation for Aggressive Driving Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw
Cited regarding the requirement to hear the party before withdrawal of the driving license.
CR.2020.0009 · vd (art. 23 al. 3 LCR)
Driving License Withdrawal Period Upheld for Repeat DUI Offender
Cited to affirm that the minimum duration for a definitive withdrawal cannot be reduced, thus justifying the rejection of the request for re-examination.
CDP.2019.209 · ne (Art. 23 al. 1 2e phrase LCR)
Driver License Withdrawal Over Sleep Apnea Test Results
The court analyzed the violation of the right to be heard, which is stipulated in this procedural rule, although it found the violation to be repaired.
IV.2018.126 · sg (Art. 23 Abs. 3 SVG)
License Withdrawal Recalculation Following Subsequent DUI-Related Offense
This provision dictates the five-year waiting period after which a measure can be reviewed, and its application was explicitly ruled upon in the amendment of the contested decision regarding the start date of this period.