Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
711 ENTGLEXLEspr CH

Art. 70 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1930 über die Enteignung (EntG)

EntG; Abschnitt VIa: Schätzungsverfahren ; II. Verfahren; 5. Doppelte Schätzung; a. Auf Verlangen von Pfand- und Grundlastberechtigten
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (120 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 70 EntG

Grundpfand- und Grundlastberechtigte, die nach Artikel 21 Absatz 3 die Schätzung der Grundstücke ohne Berücksichtigung der nachgehenden beschränkten dinglichen und vorgemerkten persönlichen Rechte verlangen wollen, haben ein solches Begehren spätestens bei der Schätzungsverhandlung zu stellen.

Die Schätzungskommission hat in diesem Falle den Grundstückswert sowohl mit Berücksichtigung dieser Rechte als ohne sie zu schätzen.

Die im Range nachgehenden dinglichen und vorgemerkten persönlichen Rechte (Art. 23 Abs. 1) werden nur insoweit entschädigt, als die Schätzung ohne Berücksichtigung der Last die vorgehenden Grundpfand- und Grundlastforderungen übersteigt oder wenn diese auch bei der Schätzung mit Berücksichtigung der Last gedeckt werden.

← Art. 69 EntG Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1930 über die Enteignung (EntG) Art. 71 EntG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (163)

50.2019.3 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Property Owners v. Expropriation Tribunal (Valera Planning Vacuum Compensation)
Cited in the reasoning section as the provision mandating the referral from the LPAmm to the Lespr for procedural matters.
50.2016.3 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Expropriation Indemnity for Land with Potential Building Value
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appeal being admissible and applicable to the costs in Order 2.
50.2014.6 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Property Co-Owners v. Municipality Regarding Zoning Change Compensation
Cited to confirm the applicability of LPAmm provisions regarding procedural aspects.
10.2009.3 · ti (Art. 70 Lespr)
Expropriation Retrocession Claim Denied Due to Satisfied Public Use Objective
This article governs the allocation of court costs, which were assigned to the losing parties in this case.
10.2010.9 · ti (art. 70 LEspr.)
Property Owners v. Municipality: Dezonification and Material Expropriation Compensation
Although cited in the reasoning (point 7) regarding procedure, it is not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3.
10.2009.12 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Heir Seeks Restitution of Expropriated Land Due to Zoning Change; Claim Rejected as Time-Barred and Public Use Maintained
Applied to determine the allocation of court costs based on the outcome of the request.
50.2008.5 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Municipality Expropriation for Road Widening: Valuation Dispute Over Comparable Sales Data Exclusion
Cited for the reference regarding the active legitimacy of the appellant based on the previous decision.
50.2007.9 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Property Owner Appeal of Denial of Compensation for Material Expropriation Due to Zoning Change
Cited to confirm the application of LPamm procedural rules (Art. 28 and 31) in the context of the expropriation appeal.
10.2009.4 · ti (art. 70 LEspr)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Time-Barred Claim for Material Expropriation Compensation Due to Zoning Changes
Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the reference to the administrative procedure law, but not explicitly in the final orders.
50.2003.9 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Expropriation Compensation Dispute Over Flawed Zoning and Material Expropriation
Cited in the final order (Point 3) as applicable law governing the procedure before the Administrative Court (via reference in PAmm articles).
50.2004.2 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Property Rezoning vs. Material Expropriation Compensation Dispute
Cited in the grounds for admissibility, although the main ground for rejection comes from procedural provisions.
10.2004.97.2 · ti (Art. 70 Lespr)
Expropriation Cost Apportionment Following Impossible Agreement Term
Cited in relation to the execution procedure for monetary sums.
10.2004.97.2 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Expropriation Cost Apportionment Following Impossible Agreement Term
Cited in conjunction with Art. 34 para. 3 LPamm regarding the execution of monetary sums.
10.2006.3 · ti (art. 70 Lespr.)
Restitution Denied Due to Change in Public Purpose Zoning
This article was cited in the dispositive as the basis for allocating court costs to the losing parties.
50.2009.2 · ti (art. 70 Lespr)
Expropriation Claimant Standing on Partial Succession of Claim
Cited in the basis for judgment as a rule applied by analogy to determine the continuation of the administrative procedure.