711
ENTGLEXLEspr
CH
Art. 66 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1930 über die Enteignung (EntG)
EntG; Abschnitt VIa: Schätzungsverfahren ; II. Verfahren; 1. Einberufung
Art. 66 EntG
Kommt im Einigungsverfahren keine Einigung zustande, so leitet der Präsident der Schätzungskommission von Amtes wegen das Schätzungsverfahren ein.
Mit Zustimmung der Parteien kann das Schätzungsverfahren jedoch bis nach Fertigstellung des Werkes verschoben werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (9)
50.2017.4 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 1 Lespr)
Municipality Property Reversion Claim Time-Barred and Outside Expropriation Law
Cited in connection with the deadlines for filing a retrocession claim when the expropriated right has not been used for the intended purpose.
50.2017.4 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 Lespr)
Municipality Property Reversion Claim Time-Barred and Outside Expropriation Law
Cited in connection with the deadlines for filing a retrocession claim when the expropriated right is alienated or used for a different purpose, specifically mentioning the absolute five-year prescription term.
A-5034/2013 (Art. 66 – 74 LEspr)
Federal Administrative Court Upholds Rejection of Recusal Request
Cited as the primary procedural rules for the commission's proceedings, particularly regarding terms.
10.2009.12 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 1 Lespr)
Heir Seeks Restitution of Expropriated Land Due to Zoning Change; Claim Rejected as Time-Barred and Public Use Maintained
Cited in the reasoning for declaring the claim under Art. 61 para. 1 lit. a Lespr as time-barred (prescription).
10.2009.12 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 Lespr)
Heir Seeks Restitution of Expropriated Land Due to Zoning Change; Claim Rejected as Time-Barred and Public Use Maintained
Cited in the reasoning concerning the time limit for a claim based on Art. 61 para. 1 lit. c Lespr.
50.1998.7 · ti (Art. 66 Lespr)
Heirs' Reversion Claim for Abandoned Expropriated Land
Cited in the preamble as a general procedural provision, although the court addressed the timeliness issue based on Art. 61 Lespr in the reasoning.
50.1995.18 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 1 Lespr)
Municipality v. Heirs: Timeliness of Expropriation Reversion Claim Based on Planning Regulation Deadline
The court ruled that the claim for retrocession was timely based on the prescription term set by this article, as modified by Art. 61 cpv. 3 Lespr.
10.2009.3 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 1 Lespr)
Expropriation Retrocession Claim Denied Due to Conforming Use of Public Park Land
Used to assess the timeliness (prescription) of the claim based on non-use of the expropriated right under Art. 61 al. 1 let. a Lespr.
10.2009.3 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 Lespr)
Expropriation Retrocession Claim Denied Due to Conforming Use of Public Park Land
Used to assess the timeliness (prescription) of the claim based on misuse of the expropriated right under Art. 61 al. 1 let. c Lespr.