711
ENTGLEXLEspr
CH
CH
Art. 38 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1930 über die Enteignung (EntG)
EntG; Abschnitt III: Enteignungsverfahren ; III. Selbständiges Enteignungsverfahren; 3. Zuständigkeit
Art. 38 EntG
Für das selbständige Enteignungsverfahren ist das in der Sache zuständige Departement zuständig.
Anstelle des Departements entscheidet die Plangenehmigungsbehörde, wenn die Enteignung in Zusammenhang mit einem Werk erfolgt, für dessen Erstellung die Spezialgesetzgebung eine Plangenehmigung vorsieht.
Besondere Zuständigkeitsregelungen in anderen Bundesgesetzen bleiben vorbehalten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (15)
100 2010 423 · be (Art. 38 Abs. 1 EntG)
Seegarten Hilterfingen Lakeshore Protection Path Dispute.
Cited as the basis for assessing the appropriateness of the party costs awarded in the first instance (Regierungsrat procedure).
VD.2021.219 · bs (§ 38 Abs. 2 EntG)
Expropriation Compensation Claim Not Barred by Building Act Limitation Period
Cited to establish the scope of review of the court regarding the adequacy (Angemessenheit) of the lower authority's decision.
VD.2021.219 · bs (§ 38 EntG)
Expropriation Compensation Claim Not Barred by Building Act Limitation Period
Used to confirm the appellate jurisdiction of the Administrative Court over decisions of the Expropriationskommission.
ADM 2014 36 · ju (Art. 38 LEx)
Landowner's rezoning claim rejected due to lack of investment and non-compliance.
Applied to determine the allocation of costs and fees in administrative expropriation procedures.
A1 14 288 · vs (art. 38 al. 1 LEx)
Municipality v. Expropriation Commission (Watercourse Land Compensation)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the authority's duty to establish facts ex officio, not used in the final order.
100 2013 35 · be (Art. 38 Abs. 2 EntG)
Cantonal Administrative Court Upholds Expropriation Compensation for Road Expansion
Cited in the reasoning regarding cost allocation before the ESCHK, which is applied in point 6.
100 2013 35 · be (Art. 38 Abs. 2 EntG)
Cantonal Administrative Court Upholds Expropriation Compensation for Road Expansion
Cited in the reasoning regarding deviating cost allocation before the ESCHK due to excessive claims, but not explicitly in the dispositive.
100 2013 35 · be (Art. 38 Bst. b EntG)
Cantonal Administrative Court Upholds Expropriation Compensation for Road Expansion
Cited in the reasoning regarding cost allocation before the ESCHK, which is applied in point 6.
100 2013 35 · be (Art. 38 EntG)
Cantonal Administrative Court Upholds Expropriation Compensation for Road Expansion
Cited as the general rule for cost allocation before the ESCHK, forming the basis for the decision in point 6.
100 2013 35 · be (Art. 38 EntG)
Cantonal Administrative Court Upholds Expropriation Compensation for Road Expansion
The general rule for ESchK costs, which is noted as inapplicable before the Administrative Court in section 9.1, but its application/deviation before ESchK is mentioned in section 8.1.1.
100 2013 170 · be (Art. 38 Abs. 2 EntG)
Owner Appeal Against Partial Expropriation for Bicycle Path Compensation and Scope Denial
Cited in the reasoning regarding the cost allocation before the Expropriation Assessment Commission, which was then repeated in the final order.
50.1997.28 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 lett. a Lespr)
Expropriation Indemnity Claim: Prescription vs. Passive Standing in Road Construction Damage Suit
Cited in the final decision structure, applied to justify sending the case back to the President of the Expropriation Tribunal to decide on the timeliness exception.
50.1998.4 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 lett. d e 3 Lespr)
Municipality v. Expropriation Tribunal: Appeal of Cost Allocation in Settled Expropriation Claim
Cited in the concluding legal provisions list, establishing the court's competence to review the decision.
50.1997.39 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 lett. d) Lespr)
Property Owner v. Water Purification Consortium Settlement Appeal
Cited in the legal considerations for directing the lower court to close the procedure due to transaction.
50.1995.15 · ti (art. 38 cpv. 1 lett. d) Lespr)
Property Owners' Expropriation Appeal Moot Due to Settlement Agreement
Used by the lower court (Tribunale di espropriazione) to close the procedure following the transaction, as referenced by the higher court in its orders.