711
ENTGLEXLEspr
CH
CH
Art. 24 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1930 über die Enteignung (EntG)
EntG; Abschnitt II: Entschädigung; V. Entschädigung für beschränkte dingliche Rechte; 2. Grundpfandrechte, Grundlasten und Nutzniessungen
Art. 24 EntG
Den Grundpfand-, Grundlast- und Nutzniessungsberechtigten haftet an Stelle der enteigneten Sache die dafür geleistete Entschädigung nach Massgabe des Zivilrechtes. Sie haben das Recht zur selbständigen Antragstellung, soweit eine Benachteilung ihrer Rechte in Frage kommen kann.
Die Nutzniessungsberechtigten können ausserdem selbständig Ersatz für den Schaden verlangen, der ihnen aus dem Entzug des Nutzniessungsgegenstandes erwächst.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (20)
100 2013 170 · be (Art. 24 EntG)
Owner Appeal Against Partial Expropriation for Bicycle Path Compensation and Scope Denial
Cited in reasoning regarding the interest calculation for early possession, which is reflected in orders 3a and 4a.
20.2008.4.5 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 let. a Lespr.)
Cantonal Road Authority Expropriation and Anticipated Possession Upheld
Cited in the reasoning regarding the expropriated party's right to object, which informs the rejection of the opposition in order 1.
20.2004.6.1 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 let. d Lespr.)
Expropriation Indemnity Valuation for Garden Land Adjacent to Roundabout
Cited as the legal basis for rejecting the claim for devaluation as untimely in order 2.
20.2004.22.3 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 1 e 2 Lespr.)
Land Expropriation Compensation Dispute and Indemnity Valuation
Cited to reject a claim as tardy because it was not filed within the 30-day publication period.
10.2005.3.1 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 1 e 2 Lespr.)
Expropriation for Parking Lot and Indemnity Calculation for Non-Buildable Land
Cited in the reasoning to justify rejecting the request for the enlargement of the expropriation as being time-barred (order 3).
20.2006.20.8 · ti (art. 24 Lespr.)
Expropriation Compensation Valuation for Neighborhood Road Construction
Mentioned in the facts (Section 2) concerning the deadline for submitting claims, providing context for the procedural situation leading to the decision.
50.2007.5 · ti (art. 24 Lespr)
Municipality Expropriation Upheld Over Landowner's Access Challenge
Cited in the final decree's preamble, related to the general procedural context of expropriation review.
10.2004.91.1 · ti (art. 24 Lespr.)
Landowner Challenge to Lakeside Property Expropriation Success Due to Procedural Defects
Cited to explain that failure to send the personal notice only stops the 30-day deadline for claims, but this was not the primary reason for the annulment in Order 1.
10.2006.7.1 · ti (art. 24 Lespr.)
Expropriation Annulled Due to Formal Defects in Ownership Identification and Project Documentation
This article concerning the forfeiture period was cited in the reasoning, which contributed to the overall finding leading to the annulment in order 1.
10.2006.9.1 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 Let. a Lespr.)
Expropriation for Water Reservoir and Right-of-Way Upheld; Early Possession Denied
The rejection of the opposition to the expropriation is based on the right of opposition granted by this article, as the grounds for opposition concerning the merits were deemed inadmissible.
10.2005.3.1 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 let. a Lespr.)
Municipality Expropriation for Parking Upheld Despite Access Objection
The substantive basis for the opposition to expropriation, although the opposition was ultimately rejected based on other grounds (public utility recognized by PR).
10.2005.2.1 · ti (art. 24 cpv. 2 let a Lespr.)
Public Entity Expropriation for Road Formalization Upheld Despite Landowner Challenge to Public Interest
This article grants the expropriated party the right to oppose the expropriation, which is the procedural context addressed by the decision, although the opposition was ultimately rejected.
20.2004.43 · ti (Art. 24 cpv. 2 Lespr.)
Cantonal Approval of Vedeggio – Cassarate Road Tunnel Project
Cited in the reasoning (point 8.1) regarding the standing of objectors who are not expropriated parties ('interessate').
20.2004.43 · ti (Art. 24 cpv. 2 let. a Lespr.)
Cantonal Approval of Vedeggio – Cassarate Road Tunnel Project
Implicitly applied as the right to oppose is deemed 'affievolita' (diminished) because the public utility was recognized by the PG.
50.1999.4 · ti (Art. 24 Lespr)
Appeal Regarding Denial of Retrocession for Expropriated Property Used for Torrent Channeling
Cited in the preamble to the dispositive regarding expropriation proportionality issues, but not directly used in the final orders.