711
ENTGLEXLEspr
CH
CH
Art. 116 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1930 über die Enteignung (EntG)
EntG; Abschnitt X: Verschiedene Bestimmungen; V. Kosten; 4. Im Verfahren vor dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht und dem Bundesgericht
Art. 116 EntG
Die Kosten des Verfahrens vor dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht, einschliesslich einer Parteientschädigung an den Enteigneten, trägt der Enteigner. Werden die Begehren des Enteigneten ganz oder zum grösseren Teil abgewiesen, so können die Kosten auch anders verteilt werden. Unnötige Kosten trägt in jedem Fall, wer sie verursacht hat.
In den in Artikel 114 Absatz 3 genannten Fällen sind die Kosten gemäss den allgemeinen Grundsätzen des Bundeszivilprozessgesetzes vom 4. Dezember 1947 zu verteilen.
Im Verfahren vor dem Bundesgericht richtet sich die Kostenpflicht nach dem Bundesgerichtsgesetz vom 17. Juni 2005 .
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (321)
1C_269/2026 (Art. 116 al. 1 LEx)
Expropriated landowners' entitlement to party compensation in combined road plan-approval proceedings under the Expropriation Act.
Basis for the decision that the expropriated parties are entitled to depens, leading to annulment of the lower court's refusal and remand.
A-6001/2024 (Art. 116 EntG)
Individual Denied Permit to Build Transformer Station, Easement for Cable Line Rejected
This provision was considered for cost and compensation consequences, particularly concerning expropriation, but ultimately deemed not directly applicable due to the uncertainty of the plaintiff's status as an expropriating party.
A-2870/2024 (Art. 116 al. 1 LEx)
Road Construction Approval Upheld Despite Emergency Lane Reallocation
Applied to determine the allocation of costs and legal aid in cases involving expropriation, stating that the expropriating party bears the costs of the procedure before the Federal Administrative Court.
A-1864/2023 (Art. 116 cpv. 1 LEspr)
Railway Infrastructure Project Approval Challenges
Used to determine who bears the legal costs for expropriated parties.
A-792/2024 (Art. 116 Abs. 1 EntG)
Water Source Diminution Due to Tunnel Renovation: Expropriation Claim Remitted for Factual Investigation
Applied for the allocation of court costs and party compensation in expropriation proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court.
A-792/2024 (Art. 116 Abs. 1 EntG)
Water Source Diminution Due to Tunnel Renovation: Expropriation Claim Remitted for Factual Investigation
Determines that in expropriation proceedings, the expropriating party bears the costs of the proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court, including party compensation.
A-4914/2023 (Art. 116 Abs. 1 EntG)
Aircraft Noise Compensation for Property Value Loss
Governs the allocation of costs and party compensation in expropriation proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court, as applied in dispositive orders 6 and 7 for procedural costs and party compensation.
A-5274/2023 (Art. 116 Abs. 1 EntG)
Property Value Diminution Due to Airport Overflights and Noise Pollution
Used to determine that the expropriators must bear the costs of the proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court.
A-5825/2024 (Art. 116 Abs. 1 EntG)
Airport Noise Compensation and Property Value Dispute
This article, concerning cost allocation in expropriation proceedings, is applied to determine that the expropriators shall bear the costs of the proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court.
A-1248/2024 (Art. 116 cpv. 1 LEspr)
Bellinzona Railway Expansion Upheld by Federal Court
Applied to allocate court costs, specifically considering the expropriation context for some parties.
A-3983/2021 (Art. 116 LEspr)
Future Memory Proof for Railway Noise Dismissed
Determines the allocation of procedural costs and recoverable expenses, stating that they are generally borne by the expropriator unless the expropriated party's claims are rejected entirely or predominantly, and that costs incurred unnecessarily are borne by the party causing them.
A-3885/2023 (Art. 116 Abs. 1 EntG)
Federal Truck Stop Permit Overturned for Procedural Flaws
Cited for determining cost and compensation consequences, specifically that the expropriator must bear the costs of the proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court, including party compensation to the expropriated party.
A-3149/2024 (Art. 116 Abs. 1 Satz 1 EntG)
Property Owners' Right to Compensation for Diminished Property Value Due to Flight Noise Affirmed
Determines that the expropriator must bear the costs of the proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court, including party compensation for the expropriated party.
A-3149/2024 (Art. 116 Abs. 1 Satz 2 und 3 EntG)
Property Owners' Right to Compensation for Diminished Property Value Due to Flight Noise Affirmed
Allows for a different distribution of costs if the expropriated party's requests are rejected in whole or in larger part, and states that anyone who causes unnecessary costs must bear them.
A-7915/2024 (Art. 116 al. 1 LEx)
Federal Administrative Court Upholds Railway Platform Extension Approval
Governs the allocation of costs in expropriation proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court.