711
ENTGLEXLEspr
CH
CH
Art. 114 Bundesgesetz vom 20. Juni 1930 über die Enteignung (EntG)
EntG; Abschnitt X: Verschiedene Bestimmungen; V. Kosten; 2. Verteilung, Zuständigkeit
Art. 114 EntG
Die aus der Geltendmachung des Enteignungsrechts entstehenden Kosten trägt der Enteigner.
Bei offensichtlich missbräuchlichen Begehren oder bei offensichtlich übersetzten Forderungen können die Kosten ganz oder teilweise dem Enteigneten auferlegt werden.
Die allgemeinen Grundsätze des Bundesgesetzes vom 4. Dezember 1947 über den Bundeszivilprozess über die Kosten sind anwendbar im Rückforderungsverfahren (Art. 102 und 103) sowie im selbständigen Enteignungsverfahren in Fällen von Artikel 36 Absatz 2, sofern die dort genannten Voraussetzungen fehlen.
Jede Behörde legt die Verfahrenskosten für ihren Verfahrensabschnitt selbst fest; vorbehalten bleiben Entscheide der Beschwerdeinstanzen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (84)
A-792/2024 (Art. 114 Abs. 3 EntG)
Water Source Diminution Due to Tunnel Renovation: Expropriation Claim Remitted for Factual Investigation
Cited to justify not applying the general principles of the Federal Code of Civil Procedure.
A-4710/2023 (Art. 114 Abs. 1 EntG)
Airport Noise Compensation Claim Denied
Basis for the allocation of court costs in expropriation proceedings.
A-5016/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 1 EntG)
Expropriation Commission Cost Division Upheld Despite Alleged Abusive Recusal Motion
Applied as the general rule for cost allocation in expropriation proceedings, where the expropriator typically bears the costs.
A-5016/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 2 EntG)
Expropriation Commission Cost Division Upheld Despite Alleged Abusive Recusal Motion
Applied to allow the commission to impose costs, in whole or in part, on the expropriated party in cases of obviously abusive requests.
A-1287/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 1 EntG)
Aircraft Noise Compensation Fee Dispute
Cited as the general rule for bearing costs in first-instance expropriation proceedings.
A-1287/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 2 EntG)
Aircraft Noise Compensation Fee Dispute
Cited to consider imposing costs on the expropriated party in cases of obviously abusive or exorbitant claims, but ultimately not applied.
A-1288/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 1 EntG)
Flight Noise Compensation Fee Assessment Dispute
This provision establishes the general rule that the expropriator bears the costs of expropriation proceedings in the first instance, which was considered in the appeal.
A-1288/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 2 EntG)
Flight Noise Compensation Fee Assessment Dispute
This provision allows for costs to be borne by the expropriated party in cases of obviously abusive requests or demands, which was argued by the appellant but ultimately rejected.
A-6064/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 1 EntG)
Airport Noise Compensation Dispute: Cost Assessment Vacated for Insufficient Justification
Cited as the legal basis for attributing costs for expropriation proceedings to the expropriator.
A-6069/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 1 EntG)
Property Owner's Noise Claim Dismissal and Cost Dispute
Cited to support the argument that costs for the provisional assessment should be borne by the applicant.
A-858/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 1 EntG)
Property Owner v. Airport Operator: Appeal on Costs and Procedural Influence
This provision establishes the general rule that the expropriator bears the costs of an expropriation procedure, which was relevant in deciding who should bear the costs of the prior instance.
A-858/2022 (Art. 114 Abs. 2 EntG)
Property Owner v. Airport Operator: Appeal on Costs and Procedural Influence
This provision allows for costs to be shifted to the expropriated party in cases of obviously abusive requests or obviously excessive claims, which was relevant in the expropriator's plea to shift costs.
A-2088/2021 (Art. 114 Abs. 1 EntG)
Railway Noise Barrier Dispute
This provision dictates that the expropriator bears the costs arising from the assertion of expropriation rights, which is relevant for allocating costs in the appeal procedure as it involves potential expropriation.
A-3816/2022 (Art. 114 al. 1 et 115 al. 1 LEx)
Federal Administrative Court Annuls Expropriation Compensation Decision Over Calculation Dispute
Establishes that the expropriating party generally bears the costs and attorney fees of the proceedings before the lower authority.
A-3820/2022 (Art. 114 al. 1 LEx)
Expropriation Compensation for Railway Tunnel Easements Remanded for Clarification
Used to determine that the expropriating party generally bears the costs of the proceedings before the lower authority, including awarded compensation for legal representation.