704
FWGLCPRLPS
CH
CH
Art. 7 Bundesgesetz vom 4. Oktober 1985 über Fuss- und Wanderwege (FWG) - Ersatz
FWG
Art. 7 FWG · Ersatz
Müssen die in den Plänen enthaltenen Fuss- und Wanderwegnetze oder Teile davon aufgehoben werden, so ist, unter Berücksichtigung der örtlichen Verhältnisse, für angemessenen Ersatz durch vorhandene oder neu zu schaffende Wege zu sorgen.
Fuss- und Wanderwege sind insbesondere zu ersetzen, wenn sie: a. nicht mehr frei begehbar sind; b. abgegraben, zugedeckt oder sonstwie unterbrochen werden; c. auf einer grösseren Wegstrecke stark befahren oder für den allgemeinen Fahrverkehr geöffnet werden; d. auf einer grösseren Wegstrecke mit Belägen versehen werden, die für die Fussgänger ungeeignet sind.
Die Kantone regeln in ihrem Bereich das Verfahren für die Aufhebung von Wegen und bestimmen, wer zum Ersatz verpflichtet ist.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (21)
60/2013/4 · sh (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. c FWG)
Government Council Decision Overturning Municipal Traffic Ban Remanded for Procedural Errors
This provision on when a footpath must be replaced if heavily trafficked is part of the necessary substantive review.
VWBES.2009.218 · so (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. d FWG)
Appeal Regarding Partial Asphalt Paving of Existing Access Road to Mountain Inn
This provision concerning the replacement of footpaths paved with unsuitable materials was examined, but ultimately found not to impede the project as the section in question is not used as a footpath.
V 2022 53 · zg (Art. 7 FWG)
Hiking Association v. Cantonal Administration (Trail Route Approval)
The appeal was rejected because the new route is considered an adequate replacement for the old route in the sense of this article.
2022.05.18.vv.2 · bl (§ 7 Abs. 2 FWG)
*Galvanizing Facility Fire & Chemical Hazard: Cost Allocation Dispute*
Cited as the legal basis to determine whether the fire event was caused intentionally or by gross negligence, which would affect the cost reimbursement.
2022.05.18.vv.2 · bl (§ 7 FWG)
*Galvanizing Facility Fire & Chemical Hazard: Cost Allocation Dispute*
Cited as the basis for cost allocation for fire events.
110 2019 132 · be (Art. 7 FWG)
Appeal Against Municipal Building Permit for Road Renovation Over Historic Footpath
The provision justifying the demand for an appropriate replacement when a path section is covered with unsuitable surfacing.
110 2016 1 · be (Art. 7 Abs. 1 FWG)
Property Owner Appeal Against Footpath Extinguishment
The partial acceptance of the appeal regarding the path section E.________ - F.________ is based on the fact that the removal of the path is not unavoidable as required by this provision.
B.2014.128 · sg (Art. 7 Abs. 1 FWG (SR 704))
Appeal Against Refusal of Partial Road Plan Dismissed Due to Landscape and Wildlife Protection Concerns
This provision regarding the requirement for adequate replacement when footpaths are abolished was central to the court's assessment of the proposed path relocation.
B.2014.128 · sg (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. d FWG (SR 704))
Appeal Against Refusal of Partial Road Plan Dismissed Due to Landscape and Wildlife Protection Concerns
This provision concerning the replacement of footpaths paved with unsuitable surfaces was used to justify the need for the path relocation/upgrade.
B.2014.128 · sg (Art. 7 Abs. 1 FWG)
Road Plan Rejection Due to Environmental Impact on Wildlife Habitat and Landscape Protection
Implicitly used as a basis for evaluating the need for adequate replacement when a footpath is affected.
B.2014.128 · sg (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. d FWG)
Road Plan Rejection Due to Environmental Impact on Wildlife Habitat and Landscape Protection
Implicitly used to establish that the planned road surfacing requires a replacement for the footpath.
110 2014 64 · be (Art. 7 Abs. 1 FWG)
Appeal Regarding Retroactive Building Permit for Landscaping, Retaining Wall, and Public Footpath Relocation Due to Usability and Setback Violations
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the requirement for appropriate replacement when parts of the footpath network must be discontinued or cancelled.
AC.2012.0363 · vd (Art. 7 al. 2 let. c LCPR)
Appeal Against Parking Permit Approval Due to Access Road Encroachment on Public Hiking Route
The court considered the introduction of vehicle traffic on the path, assimilating it to the opening to vehicle circulation requiring the replacement of the footpath, which had not been provided for.
Verwaltung ARGVP 2014 1531 · ar (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. d FWG)
Appeal Regarding Building Regulations in Water Protection Zone and Paving of Access Road with Hiking Trail
The decision addresses the basis for the replacement obligation concerning footpaths paved with unsuitable materials.
Verwaltung ARGVP 2010 1494 · ar (Art. 7 Abs. 2 FWG)
Appeal Against Refusal to Relocate Public Footpath and Hiking Trail
Used to argue that the proposed alternative (asphalted sidewalk) constitutes an unsuitable walking surface (Hartbeläge).