700
RPGLATLPT
CH
CH
Art. 38a Bundesgesetz vom 22. Juni 1979 über die Raumplanung (RPG) - Übergangsbestimmungen zur Änderung vom 15. Juni 2012
RPG; 6. Titel: Schlussbestimmungen
Art. 38a RPG · Übergangsbestimmungen zur Änderung vom 15. Juni 2012
Die Kantone passen innert fünf Jahren nach Inkrafttreten der Änderung vom 15. Juni 2012 ihre Richtpläne an die Anforderungen der Artikel 8 und 8 a Absatz 1 an.
Bis zur Genehmigung dieser Richtplananpassung durch den Bundesrat darf im betreffenden Kanton die Fläche der rechtskräftig ausgeschiedenen Bauzonen insgesamt nicht vergrössert werden.
Nach Ablauf der Frist von Absatz 1 ist die Ausscheidung neuer Bauzonen unzulässig, solange der betreffende Kanton nicht über eine vom Bundesrat genehmigte Richtplananpassung verfügt.
Die Kantone regeln innert fünf Jahren nach Inkrafttreten der Änderung vom 15. Juni 2012 den angemessenen Ausgleich für erhebliche Vor- und Nachteile nach den Anforderungen von Artikel 5.
Nach Ablauf der Frist von Absatz 4 ist die Ausscheidung neuer Bauzonen unzulässig, solange der betreffende Kanton nicht über einen angemessenen Ausgleich nach den Anforderungen von Artikel 5 verfügt. Der Bundesrat bezeichnet nach Anhörung diese Kantone.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (51)
90.2021.37 · ti (art. 38a LPT)
Federal Authority v. Cantonal Government: Annulment of Historical Settlement Zone Approval Due to Exceeded Buildability Limit
The appeal was granted because the approval of the IS zone constituted an unauthorized increase in developable area in light of the expiry of the deadline provided by this article for Cantonal Master Plans.
AC.2024.0379 · vd (art. 38a LAT)
Appeal Dismissal Regarding Zoning Approval for Event Center and Road Development
Cited to dismiss the appeal ground concerning the principle of compensation, as the time limit for its application had expired.
7H 22 320 · lu (Art. 38a Abs. 4 RPG)
Planning Levy Valuation Date for Zoning Change Added Value
Although cited in the header, this provision is not explicitly used in the dispositive orders (which are missing, but the ruling implies an outcome that would normally refer to the substantive law applied).
7H 22 320 · lu (Art. 38a Abs. 5 RPG)
Planning Levy Valuation Date for Zoning Change Added Value
Although cited in the header, this provision is not explicitly used in the dispositive orders (which are missing, but the ruling implies an outcome that would normally refer to the substantive law applied).
R 2021 87 · gr (Art. 38a RPG)
Nature Protection Organization v. Cantonal Government (Land-Use Plan Revision)
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the transition regime against excessive settlement area expansion.
R 2021 87 · gr (Art. 8, 8a, 15 und 38a RPG)
Nature Protection Organization v. Cantonal Government (Land-Use Plan Revision)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appellant's argument about oversized building zones and the circumvention of reduction duties.
CDP.2021.258 · ne (Art. 38a LAT)
Challenge to Local Plan Rezoning and Neighborhood Plan Approval
Cited in the reasoning regarding the transitional provisions for the 2012 amendment, specifically that municipalities modifying their plans without increasing the building zone do not have to take into account the new requirements of Art. 15 LAT during the transitional period.
WBE.2021.146 · ag (Art. 38a Abs. 2 RPG)
Rezoning of Property: Compensable Expropriation for Developable Land
Referenced in the context of a moratorium on new land zoning without compensation.
90.2020.58 · ti (art. 38a LPT)
Taxpayers v. State Council (Zoning Plan Amendment Validity)
The appeal was partially granted and the resolution annulled because the new zones established constituted a new building area in contrast with this article, given that the deadline for cantonal adaptation had passed.
R 2017 50 · gr (Art. 38a Abs. 2 RPG)
Appeal Against Partial Development Plan Revision for Health Hotel Dismissed
The court implicitly confirmed that the revision did not violate this provision regarding building zone enlargement, as the claim was found unfounded.
AC.2016.0354 · vd (art. 38a LAT)
Property Owners v. Land Use Plan Approval (Agricultural Land Use)
The court rejected the grounds for appeal based on this article, as the transitional regime it established had ended.
ADM 2017 94 · ju (Art. 38a LAT)
Municipal Reserve Zone upheld against financial loss challenge
Cited as a transitional provision for cantons to adapt their master plans.
B.2017.20 · sg (Art. 38a Abs. 2 RPG)
Rezoning Reversal Based on Post-May 2014 Spatial Planning Law
The court recognized the necessity of applying the transitional rules to the zoning review.
B.2017.20 · sg (Art. 38a Abs. 2 RPG)
Rezoning Appeal Remanded for Application of Transitional Spatial Planning Act Provisions
This transitional provision was used to support the argument that the requested zoning was unlawful before the approval of the revised master plan.
VD.2016.11 · bs (Art. 38a RPG)
Property Owners v. Municipality Zoning Revision
Mentioned in the context of checking the compliance of the zoning decision with cantonal development plan adaptations following the RPG revision.