700
RPGLATLPT
CH
CH
Art. 34 Bundesgesetz vom 22. Juni 1979 über die Raumplanung (RPG) - Bundesrecht
RPG; 5. Titel: Rechtsschutz
Art. 34 RPG · Bundesrecht
Für die Rechtsmittel an Bundesbehörden gelten die allgemeinen Bestimmungen über die Bundesrechtspflege.
Kantone und Gemeinden sind zur Beschwerde berechtigt gegen Entscheide letzter kantonaler Instanzen über: a. Entschädigungen als Folge von Eigentumsbeschränkungen (Art. 5); b. die Zonenkonformität von Bauten und Anlagen ausserhalb der Bauzonen; c. Bewilligungen im Sinne der Artikel 24–24 d und 37 a.
Das Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft ist zur Beschwerde berechtigt gegen Entscheide über Vorhaben, die Fruchtfolgeflächen beanspruchen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (44)
VVGE.1991.92.Nr.18 · ow (Art. 34 Abs. 1 RPG)
Enforcement Threat Not Independently Appealable
Allows administrative court appeals to the Federal Tribunal against decisions of final cantonal instances concerning permits.
VPB 2005.2460 (Art. 34 al. 2 LAT)
Agricultural Construction Expansion Act
This provision grants cantons and communes standing to appeal decisions concerning authorizations for activities outside building zones, as specified in Art. 24 to 24d.
BGE 113 IB 87 (Art. 34 cpv. 2 LPT)
Zoning plan material expropriation compensation; appeal deadline runs from end of seven-day postal holding period despite recipient's instruction to hold mail.
Ground for admitting the municipality's administrative law appeal against a cantonal decision on material expropriation compensation.
VWBES.2016.384 · so (Art. 34 Abs. 2 lit. b und c RPG)
Appeal Against Approval of Construction and Operational Changes on Protected Island Land
Cited in the reasoning to establish the standing of the municipality of Selzach to appeal (related to procedural matter, but not explicitly applied in operative orders other than determining standing).
VWBES.2016.210 · so (Art. 34 Abs. 5 RPG)
Unauthorized Construction in Protection Zone Dispute
Although discussed in the reasoning, this article is not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive) as the basis for the ruling, so it must be excluded based on the instructions.
VVGE.1999.00.Nr.44 · ow (Art. 34 Abs. 1 RPG)
Property Owner's Limited Appeal Rights on Zoning to Green Space
Cited to explain the general rule of inadmissibility of the administrative court appeal to the Federal Supreme Court in land-use planning matters, and to introduce exceptions.
V 12 137 · lu (Art. 34 Abs. 2 lit. c RPG)
Municipality Allowed to Challenge Cantonal Exemption for Asylum Home Conversion Based on Procedural Coordination Failures
Cited as the basis for the municipality's standing to appeal concerning permits under Art. 24-24d RPG.
VB.2009.00064 · zh (Art. 34 Abs. IV RPG)
Appeal Regarding Unpermitted Polo Stalls and Agricultural Zoning Compliance
This provision was cited in the case summary but not explicitly in the dispositive orders, therefore excluded based on the rules.
2007.7 · bl (Art. 34 Abs. 2 RPG)
Zoning Conformity of Farmhouse and Accessory Building
This provision grants cantons and municipalities the right to appeal against decisions concerning the zoning conformity of construction projects outside building zones.
810.06.125 · bl (Art. 34 Abs. 2 RPG)
Neighbors' Standing Upheld in Zoning Appeal Over Agricultural Dwelling Permit
Cited regarding the right of cantons and municipalities to appeal decisions on the conformity of construction projects outside building zones.
B.2005.209 · sg (Art. 34 Abs. 4 lit. a RPG)
Deer Breeding Operation Zoning Appeal
Cited in the remittal order (Order 1) to assess whether the structure is necessary for the management in question.
B.2005.209 · sg (Art. 34 Abs. 4 lit. a RPG)
Deer Breeding Barn Permit Appeal
The case was remanded to the lower authority to assess whether the building was necessary for the cultivation activity.
1P.601/2004 (Art. 34 cpv. 3 LPT)
Swiss federal public-law appeal on municipal zoning dezonement versus non-assignment to building zone; landowner's challenge to agricultural reclassification fails for insufficient Art. 90 OG reasoning and on merits under Art. 21 LPT plan stability and equal protection.
Cited as a basis for the admissibility of the public-law appeal in planning matters.
1A.62/2004 (Art. 34 al. 1 LAT)
Poultry fattening hall as internal agricultural development: necessity of complementary income for long-term farm viability under Art. 16a(2) LAT and Art. 36(1) OAT.
Main ground for the verdict, confirming the appeal concerns conformity to zoning of constructions outside the building zone.
1A.21/2003 (Art. 34 al. 3 LAT)
Swiss Federal Tribunal ruling on zoning plan for residential building near Geneva airport: planning-phase noise limits inapplicable to densification of existing building zone, immission limit values applied.
Determined the admissibility and legal avenue for the appeal against the zoning plan decision, constituting the procedural basis for the ruling.