700
RPGLATLPT
CH
CH
Art. 27 Bundesgesetz vom 22. Juni 1979 über die Raumplanung (RPG) - Planungszonen
RPG; 2. Titel: Massnahmen der Raumplanung; 3. Kapitel: Nutzungspläne
Art. 27 RPG · Planungszonen
Müssen Nutzungspläne angepasst werden oder liegen noch keine vor, so kann die zuständige Behörde für genau bezeichnete Gebiete Planungszonen bestimmen. Innerhalb der Planungszonen darf nichts unternommen werden, was die Nutzungsplanung erschweren könnte.
Planungszonen dürfen für längstens fünf Jahre bestimmt werden; das kantonale Recht kann eine Verlängerung vorsehen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (209)
VVGE.1981.82.Nr.62 · ow (Art. 27 RPG)
Municipal Building Freeze Upheld Under Federal Planning Law Despite Vested Rights Claims
This provision is the legal basis for the establishment of planning zones, which is central to the court's decision regarding the building freeze.
VVGE.1983.84.Nr.43 · ow (Art. 27 RPG)
Municipality's Appeal Against Tourism Development Planning Zone Dismissed
Cited in the context of the establishment of planning zones and the municipality's autonomy in this area.
VVGE.1993.94.Nr.22 · ow (Art. 27 RPG)
Municipal Council's Obligation to Implement Building Zone Protections After Ordinance Adoption
Cited as the federal instrument for protective measures in spatial planning, which is essentially identical in effect to the cantonal building freeze.
AC.2024.0066 · vd (art. 27 LAT)
Equestrian Center Demolition Permit Denial Upheld Due to Proposed Rezoning
Cited in the discussion regarding the scope of the reserved zone (zone réservée).
AC.2024.0137 · vd (art. 27 LAT)
Landowners v. Municipality and Cantonal Department on Zoning Reserved Zone
Cited in the reasoning as the federal law basis for establishing a zone réservée.
VB.2024.00336 · zh (Art. 27 RPG)
Municipality's Right to Appeal Land Classification Based on Current Law
This provision relates to planning law matters and is listed, suggesting it forms part of the legal basis used in the final orders.
AC.2024.0043 · vd (art. 27 al. 2 LAT)
Heirs v. Cantonal Authority on Reserved Zone Extension
Cited in connection with Art. 46 al. 1 LATC as the basis for the time limitation of the reserved zone, which the prolongation respected.
WBE.2023.352 · ag (Art. 27 RPG)
Municipality's Zoning Freeze Overturned Due to Lack of Public Interest and Proportionality
Cited as the legal basis for the establishment of planning zones and as a prerequisite for their compatibility with property guarantees.
AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 27 LAT)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision
Cited in the context of the requirement for proportionality and compliance of the reserve zone's establishment.
AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 27 LAT)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision
The court confirmed the main ground for establishing the reserve zone as compliant with this article, which governs the establishment of reserve zones.
AC.2022.0114 · vd (art. 27 LAT)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Reserved Zone Approval
Cited in the reasoning regarding the legal basis for zone réservée, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
90.2022.7 · ti (Art. 27 cpv. 1 LPT)
Property Owners and Tenants v. Municipality on Three-Year Planning Zone Validity
Cited to define the legal basis and effects of a planning zone (zona di pianificazione) under federal law.
90.2022.7 · ti (Art. 27 cpv. 2 LPT)
Property Owners and Tenants v. Municipality on Three-Year Planning Zone Validity
Cited regarding the duration of a planning zone until a replacement plan is published, but not exceeding five years.
AC.2023.0342 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC, en lien avec l'art. 27 al. 2 LAT)
Cantonal Land Reservation Extension Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge
This provision constitutes the legal basis for the prolongation of the cantonal reserved zone, which was the subject of the dispute and confirmed in the final order.
AC.2023.0345 · vd (Art. 27 LAT)
Owner Appeal Against Cantonal Zone Extension Overlapping Municipal Zone
The court found the federal provision regarding the maximum duration of a reserved zone, which implies a violation of proportionality in the cantonal extension, to be the main ground for allowing the appeal.