700.1
RPVOATOPT
CH
Art. 52 Raumplanungsverordnung (RPV) - Übergangsbestimmungen
RPV; 6. Kapitel: Schlussbestimmungen
Art. 52 RPV · Übergangsbestimmungen
Verfahren, die bei Inkrafttreten dieser Verordnung und der RPG-Änderung vom 20. März 1998 hängig sind, werden nach neuem Recht beurteilt.
Hängige Beschwerdeverfahren werden nach bisherigem Recht zu Ende geführt, sofern das neue Recht für den Gesuchsteller oder die Gesuchstellerin nicht günstiger ist.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (29)
VVGE.2001.02.Nr.15 · ow (Art. 52 Abs. 2 RPV)
Barn Additions Exceed Permissible Zoning Changes
This provision determined that the case would be concluded under the previous law unless the new law proved more favorable to the appellants.
V 99 153 · lu (Art. 52 RPV)
Appeal Regarding Commercial Building Permit in Agricultural Zone Under Transitional Law
This provision was cited to establish the applicable law (old law) for the pending appeal proceedings based on the date the decision was rendered.
B.2015.71 · sg (Art. 52 RPV)
Zoning Dispute: Green Zone Designation vs. Property Rights and Land Hoarding
Cited in the reasoning section concerning transitional law, but not in the final operative orders (1-3).
AC.2013.0263 · vd (art. 52 al. 2 OAT)
Wind Farm Land-Use Plan Annulment Due to Insufficient Environmental Studies
Applied as the general rule for transitional law, stating that pending appeal procedures are governed by the law in force at the time the decision under appeal was made (regarding the application of new LAT/OAT provisions).
B.2013.97 · sg (Art. 52 Abs. 2 RPV)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Expansion of All-Weather Run-off Area and Riding Arena in Agricultural Zone
Applied to determine that pending appeal proceedings are concluded under previous law if the new law is not more favorable to the applicant, leading to the application of the new law in this case.
B.2013.97 · sg (Art. 52 Abs. 2 RPV)
Horse Pension Expansion Appeal and Cost Reimbursement Remand
Cited to determine the applicability of the new spatial planning law provisions to pending appeal proceedings.
Verwaltung ARGVP 2014 1526 · ar (Art. 52 Abs. 1 RPV)
Property Setback Violation and Voided Solar Installation Permits
The court applied this provision to rule that pending proceedings must be judged according to the new law.
AC.2000.0175 · vd (art. 52 al. 1er OAT)
Neighbor Appeal of Municipal Decision Due to Conflict of Interest Invalidating Vote
Cited in the reasoning as the provision governing the application of new law to ongoing procedures.
AC.2000.0103 · vd (art. 52 de l’ordonnance sur l’aménagement du territoire, du 28 juin 2000 (OAT))
Building Permit Refusal Upheld: New Agricultural Structure Deemed Unauthorized Construction
This provision governed the transitional law issue regarding which version of the Federal Law (LAT) was applicable.
VB.2003.00157 · zh (Art. 52 lit. I RPV)
Bee House Conversion Permit Denial Upheld
This provision is listed under the legal norms, indicating its relevance to the decision's outcome.
AGVE.2003.52 · ag (Art. 52 Abs. 1 RPV)
Agricultural Zoning Dispute Over Horse Breeding Facility
Cited to determine that the proceedings are to be judged according to new law.
AC.1999.0154 · vd (art. 52 OAT)
Appeal on Special Authorization for Agricultural Animal Shelter and Enclosure Upheld
The construction of the all-weather enclosure is admissible under the framework provided by this article in conjunction with Art. 24c LAT.
52.2001.92 · ti (Art. 52 OPT)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Building Permit for Non-Conforming Structure Replacement
Cited in the concluding section as the legal basis for applying new law to the pending appeal procedure.
52.2000.322 · ti (art. 52 OPT)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Fence and Tool Shed on Agricultural Land
Cited in the preamble to the operative part regarding the application of new legislation to pending procedures.
TVR.2001.Nr.18 · tg (Art. 52 RPV)
Demolition Order Prevails Over Exception Permit for Agricultural Zone Building
This provision was mentioned in the context of the applicability of law (intertemporal law) for pending appeal procedures, which is relevant to the overall ruling context, although not directly cited in the numbered orders themselves as the primary basis for the final disposition (which focused on Art. 24 RPG).