531
LVGLAP
CH
CH
Art. 25 Bundesgesetz vom 17. Juni 2016 über die wirtschaftliche Landesversorgung (LVG) - Pfandrecht
LVG; 2. Kapitel: Vorbereitungsmassnahmen
Art. 25 LVG · Pfandrecht
Wird gegen den Pflichtlagereigentümer eine Betreibung auf Pfändung oder Pfandverwertung des Pflichtlagers und allfälliger Ersatzansprüche eingeleitet, so hat der Bund für seine gesicherten Forderungen die Stellung eines nicht betreibenden Pfandgläubigers im ersten Rang.
Dritte mit gesetzlichen oder vertraglichen Ansprüchen auf das Pflichtlager haben als Gläubiger für ihre Forderungen ein Befriedigungsrecht unmittelbar nach dem Bund oder gegebenenfalls nach dem Garantiefonds.
Sicherungsansprüche Dritter auf Pflichtlagerwaren oder auf Ersatzforderungen des Schuldners können nur durch Betreibung geltend gemacht werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)
U 2022 47 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. c della Legge sugli appalti pubblici (Lap))
Administrative Court Upholds Exclusion of Bid for Public Works Contract Due to Unmet Suitability Criteria and Incomplete Cost Breakdown
Cited as the basis for the Administrative Tribunal's competence to judge the appeal regarding public procurement matters.
U 2020 66 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. d Lap)
Road Construction Tender Cancellation Upheld Due to Collusion Suspicion
Cited to establish the administrative court's competence to judge the appeals.
U 2021 74 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. c e d della Legge sugli appalti pubblici [Lap; CSC 803.300])
Appeals Concerning Voided Construction Tender Award
Used to confirm the court's jurisdiction to judge the appeals.
U 2021 74 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 3 Lap)
Appeals Concerning Voided Construction Tender Award
This article, stating that direct contract awards are not appealable, was cited in the context of determining whether the decision was appealable, leading to the decision to treat the case as an invitation procedure.
U 2021 76 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. c e d Lap)
Municipality Contract Award Challenge and Cancellation Overturned
Cited to establish the Administrative Court's jurisdiction over the appeal concerning public procurement.
U 2021 76 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 3 Lap)
Municipality Contract Award Challenge and Cancellation Overturned
Cited in the reasoning regarding the inadmissibility of appeals against decisions made via direct mandate, which serves as a backdrop for determining the nature of the procedure used.
U 2021 77 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. d della Legge sugli appalti pubblici [Lap; CSC 803.300])
Municipality's Tender Cancellation Overturned Due to Ambiguous Documentation
Cited as establishing the Administrative Tribunal's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal.
U 2021 77 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 3 Lap)
Municipality's Tender Cancellation Overturned Due to Ambiguous Documentation
Cited to confirm that direct awards are generally not appealable, but that an appeal is possible if the wrong procedure type was used.
U 2020 65 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. c della Legge sugli appalti pubblici [Lap; CSC 803.300])
Tender Cancellation Upheld Due to Cartel Suspicions
Cited to confirm the administrative court's jurisdiction to judge the appeal.
U 2020 79 · gr (Art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. a Lap)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Public Works Contract Award Transparency Concerns
Cited in the reasoning to dismiss the appellant's arguments regarding the late challenge of the tender documentation criteria.
V 2017 2 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. c Lap)
Waste Contract Award Lapsed After Dissolution of Awarding Authority
The appeal was granted (ricorso giudiziario è accolto) because the recovery of the lapsed award decision violated public procurement rules, specifically concerning exclusion from the procedure.
U 2017 25 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 1 Lap)
Bid Exclusion Due to Omitted Technical Specifications in Winter Maintenance Contract
Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal against the contracting authority's decision.
200 2015 28 · be (art. 25 LAP)
Claimant v. Swiss Invalidity Insurance Office (Alopecia, Pain, and Work Capacity)
Not applicable, provision relates to appeal entitlement, not cited in OS.
U 2011 70 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. c Lap)
Bidder Lacks Standing to Challenge Contract Award Based on Technical Non-Compliance
It is cited as the basis for the administrative court's jurisdiction in the context of the procedure.
U 2006 10 · gr (art. 25 cpv. 2 Lap)
Public Tender Dispute Over Material Specification Error and Bid Adjustment
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over decisions concerning the revocation or repetition of the procedure.