455
TSCHGLPALPAN
CH
Art. 42 Tierschutzgesetz (TSchG) - Kantonale Vorschriften
TSchG; 6. Kapitel: Schlussbestimmungen
Art. 42 TSchG · Kantonale Vorschriften
Soweit dieses Gesetz zu seiner Ausführung der Ergänzung durch kantonales Recht bedarf, sind die Kantone verpflichtet, die entsprechenden Vorschriften aufzustellen.
Die Kantone bringen die Ausführungsvorschriften dem Eidgenössischen Departement des Innern zur Kenntnis.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (26)
A/3950/2021 · ge (art. 42 LPA)
Appeal Against Sexual Harassment Finding Rejected
Cited in the dispositive regarding the rejection of the complaint about the violation of the right to be heard concerning access to the file.
A/4227/2015 · ge (art. 42 LPA)
Public Employee Termination Upheld for Workplace Weapon Misconduct
Cited during the analysis of the right to be heard concerning participation in witness hearings.
A/1586/2015 · ge (art. 42 al. 6 LPA)
Municipal Council Procedural Violation Regarding Employee Hearing
Cited in the reasoning concerning the procedural requirement related to witness statements, relevant to the finding of the grave violation.
A/3942/2011 · ge (art. 42 al. 5 LPA)
Disciplinary Revocation Upheld Despite Procedural Flaws Due to Egregious Misconduct
The rule justifying the hearing of a witness (Ms. H_____) in the absence of the appealing party due to preponderant private interest (protecting her health).
A/3740/2024 · ge (art. 42 al. 1 LPA)
Revocation of Foundation Board Member Upheld Following Physical Altercation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to participate in hearings, but not explicitly used in the final orders to reject the appeal.
A/901/2024 · ge (art. 42 al. 4 LPA)
Appeal Regarding Operating Hour Derogation Denial Due to Unrelated Infractions and Proportionality Violation
Cited in the context of the appellant's right to review written information received from third parties or other authorities.
A/3817/2022 · ge (art. 42 al. 4 LPA)
Veterinarian Appeal of Practice Suspension Upheld for Professional Misconduct
Cited in the context of the appellant's right to be heard (right to consult written information collected from third parties).
A/3075/2021 · ge (Art. 42 al. 1 LPA)
Appeal Dismissed: Sham Marriage for Residency Permit
Cited when examining the right to be present during the administration of evidence, such as witness hearings.
A/3075/2021 · ge (Art. 42 al. 5 LPA)
Appeal Dismissed: Sham Marriage for Residency Permit
Cited when examining the conditions under which witnesses can be heard in the absence of the parties.
A/3919/2018 · ge (art. 42 al. 1 LPA)
Violation of Right to be Heard in Animal Seizure Case
The court found a violation of the right to be heard concerning the participation in evidence administration, as guaranteed by this administrative procedure law article, in the dispositive through the annulment of the administrative decision.
A/86/2017 · ge (art. 42 al. 1 LPA)
Municipality Termination for Refusal to Sign Documents Unlawful Due to Procedural Delay
Cited in the reasoning for procedural context regarding the right to participate in evidence administration, though not strictly in the final dispositive orders regarding the merits of the case.
PS.2010.0059 · vd (Art. 42 let. d LPA)
Social Assistance Recipient v. Social Welfare Service (Visit Expense Reimbursement)
Cited in the reasoning (paragraph 1.b) regarding the requirement for a decision to contain a dispositve ruling on the fate of the appeal, which was violated by the contested decision.
A/1395/2010 · ge (art. 42 al. 1 LPA)
Algerian National Family Reunification Permit Refusal Upheld Due to Police Record, Lower Court Procedural Violation on Right to Be Heard
Cited in the reasoning which justifies the decision to annul the lower court's judgment based on procedural violation (right to be heard).
AC.2009.0167 · vd (Art. 42 let. f LPA)
Municipality v. Appellant Regarding Mixed-Use Building Permit Internal Connection Restriction
The court's analysis leading to the admission of the appeal relied on the municipality's decision of May 7, 2009, failing to indicate the proper remedy as required by this provision.
GE.2009.0115 · vd (Art. 42 al. 1 let. c LPA)
Appeal of Performance Evaluation Confirmation Upheld Due to Lack of Bias and Sufficient Motivation
This article was cited by the appellant to claim the appealed decision lacked proper motivation.