455
TSCHGLPALPAN
CH
CH
Art. 15 Tierschutzgesetz (TSchG) - Grundsätze
TSchG; 2. Kapitel: Umgang mit Tieren
Art. 15 TSchG · Grundsätze
Tiertransporte sind schonend und ohne unnötige Verzögerung durchzuführen. Die Fahrzeit ab Verladeplatz beträgt höchstens sechs Stunden. Der Bundesrat erlässt die Ausnahmebestimmungen.
Er regelt nach Anhörung der Branchenorganisationen die Anforderungen an die Aus- und Weiterbildung des mit dem gewerbsmässigen Transport betrauten Personals.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (104)
A/1648/2018 · ge (art. 15 al. 1 let. d LPA)
Appeal Against Recusal Rejection and Unlawful Employment Termination Based on Perceived Partiality
The court found objective circumstances suggesting the partiality of the Chair of the Board of Directors, leading to the admission of the challenge.
A/2359/2017 · ge (art. 15 al. 1 let. d LPA)
Appeal Against Refusal to Recuse Administrative Investigator in Misconduct Case Upheld
Cited in the reasoning leading to the conclusion that the grounds for challenging the investigator's impartiality were not met, though not explicitly in the dispositive's final orders, but the overall appeal was rejected based on the grounds analyzed concerning impartiality.
A/4161/2016 · ge (art. 15 al. 1 let. d LPA)
Employee v. Administrative Authority Regarding Investigator Recusal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the grounds for the request for recusal, which was ultimately rejected by the final order.
A/2053/2013 · ge (Art. 15 al. 1 LPA)
Recusal of Governmental Body Inadmissible and Unfounded
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal concerning the recusation request, although not the primary ground for the final rejection.
A/187/2009 · ge (Art. 15 al. 2 let. d LPA)
Appeal Against Rejection of Recusal Motion Based on Prior Investigator Contact
This provision requires members of administrative authorities to recuse themselves if circumstances suggest partiality, forming the basis for the request to recuse the investigator.
A/4018/2024 · ge (Art. 15 LPA)
Association's Appeal Against Subsidy Withdrawal for Financial Non-Compliance Rejected
Cited in the reasoning concerning the conditions for recusal of administrative authority members.
A/3336/2024 · ge (art. 15 al. 3 LPA)
Applicant v. Bar School Direction Council (Recusal Request)
The court implicitly upheld the decision to declare the recusal request inadmissible based on the timeliness requirement cited in this procedural provision, as detailed in the reasoning of the final orders.
A/3740/2024 · ge (art. 15 LPA)
Revocation of Foundation Board Member Upheld Following Physical Altercation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty to recuse, but not explicitly used in the final orders to reject the appeal.
A/3740/2024 · ge (art. 15B al. 1 LPA)
Revocation of Foundation Board Member Upheld Following Physical Altercation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the deadline to challenge recusal, but not explicitly used in the final orders to reject the appeal.
A/1391/2021 · ge (art. 15 al. 1 let. f LPA)
Arbitrator Recusal Denial Based on Prior Employment and Professional Contacts
The refusal of the recusal request was based on the finding that the guarantee of an impartial judge was respected, rejecting the alleged violation of this article.
VB.2024.00131 · zh (Art. 15 Abs. I TSchG)
Donkey Euthanasia Upheld Due to Severe Neglect
Cited as the legal basis for the confiscation of animals, a central action in the case.
A/2539/2024 · ge (art. 15 al. 3 LPA)
Foundation Bid Rejection Appeal Interim Relief Refusal
This procedural rule concerning the timing for submitting a request for recusal was discussed in relation to the appellant's arguments regarding jury impartiality.
A/3273/2023 · ge (Art. 15A al. 1 LPA)
Endocrinologist Recusal Denial in Cost-Effectiveness Arbitration
This provision enumerates the grounds for recusal, and the dismissal of the recusal request implies that none of these grounds were met.
A/190/2020 · ge (art. 15 al. 1 LPA)
Health Insurers v. Physician: Cost-Effectiveness Dispute and Expert Assessment
Cited as the provision containing the grounds for recusal applicable to experts via Art. 39 al. 2 LPA.
A/190/2020 · ge (art. 15 al. 2 LPA)
Health Insurers v. Physician: Cost-Effectiveness Dispute and Expert Assessment
Cited regarding the non-recusal of State Council members in non-contentious matters.