451
NHGLPN
CH
CH
Art. 7 Bundesgesetz vom 1. Juli 1966 über den Natur- und Heimatschutz (NHG)
NHG; Zweck; 1. Abschnitt: Naturschutz, Heimatschutz und Denkmalpflege bei Erfüllung von Bundesaufgaben ; Begutachtung durch die Kommission
Art. 7 NHG
Ist für die Erfüllung einer Bundesaufgabe der Bund zuständig, so beurteilt je nach Zuständigkeit das Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU), das Bundesamt für Kultur oder das Bundesamt für Strassen, ob ein Gutachten durch eine Kommission nach Artikel 25 Absatz 1 erforderlich ist. Ist der Kanton zuständig, so obliegt diese Beurteilung der kantonalen Fachstelle nach Artikel 25 Absatz 2.
Kann bei der Erfüllung der Bundesaufgabe ein Objekt, das in einem Inventar des Bundes nach Artikel 5 aufgeführt ist, erheblich beeinträchtigt werden oder stellen sich in diesem Zusammenhang grundsätzliche Fragen, so verfasst die Kommission zuhanden der Entscheidbehörde ein Gutachten. Die Kommission gibt darin an, ob das Objekt ungeschmälert zu erhalten oder wie es zu schonen ist.
Das Gutachten bildet eine der Grundlagen für die Abwägung aller Interessen durch die Entscheidbehörde.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (64)
60/2008/48A · sh (Art. 7 NHG/Bund)
Municipality v. Cantonal Government: Cellular Facility Permit Dispute
Cited regarding the duty to consult expert commissions (ENHK or EKD) when there is a risk of significant impairment to a protected object.
60/2008/48A · sh (Art. 7 NHG/SH)
Municipality v. Cantonal Government: Cellular Facility Permit Dispute
Mentioned in relation to communal provisions on ensemble protection zones, but the federal standard (Art. 6 NHG/Bund) was deemed decisive for the national importance aspect.
VB.2003.00421 · zh (Art. 7 NHG)
Appeal Regarding Exception Permit for Joint Municipal Shooting Range Construction
This provision of the Nature and Heritage Protection Act was considered in the context of the project's impact on the landscape.
VB.2024.00496 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. II NHG)
Appeal Against Mobile Phone Antenna Permit Dismissed
The provision concerning the requirement for an expert opinion from the EKD/ENHK was addressed in the reasoning concluding that there was no significant impairment as per this article, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
VB.2024.00449 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 1 NHG)
Building Permit Appeal: Failure to Justify Agency Opinion in Protected Area
This provision was mentioned in the context of the involvement of the relevant cantonal authority, though the main issue was the failure to rule on the findings under Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG.
VB.2024.00449 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG)
Building Permit Appeal: Failure to Justify Agency Opinion in Protected Area
The court found that the lower court failed to review the ARE's assessment regarding significant impairment or a fundamental question under this article.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0100.010 · zh (Art. 7 NHG)
Appeal Against Residential Complex Permit Design and Tree Preservation
This provision concerning the mandatory requirement to obtain an expert opinion from federal commissions if an object in a federal inventory is significantly affected was relevant to the ISOS objection, but the conditions for its application were not met.
WBE.2023.375.384 · ag (Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG)
Regional Government's Road Project Decision Partially Overturned Due to Noise, Traffic Safety, and Access to Information Concerns
Cited as the legal basis requiring consultation with the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) when a federal task could significantly impair a protected object.
VB.2024.00110 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 1 NHG)
Appeal Regarding Photovoltaic Permit Denial in Area of National Significance
This provision regarding the protection of nature and landscape is listed as a cited legal norm relevant to the case subject matter.
VB.2024.00110 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG)
Appeal Regarding Photovoltaic Permit Denial in Area of National Significance
This provision regarding the protection of nature and landscape is listed as a cited legal norm relevant to the case subject matter.
WBE.2023.287 · ag (Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG)
Judicial Review of Hydropower Plant Optimization Project Approval
The court discussed the requirement for expert opinions from the ENHK or EKD when federal inventory objects are significantly impacted, although it ultimately did not find a decisive procedural error in its absence for the 2015 decision.
VB.2023.00729 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. I NHG)
Building Permit for ISOS Property Upheld Despite Procedural Error
Cited for the violation concerning the federal agency's involvement in assessing whether an expert report from the Federal Office of Culture (ENHK) or the Federal Office of Civil Defence (EKD) was required.
VB.2023.00062 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. I NHG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Near Protected Area and Villa
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' cited in the context of the decision regarding heritage protection.
VB.2023.00062 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. II NHG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Near Protected Area and Villa
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' cited in the context of the decision regarding heritage protection.
VB.2024.00239 · zh (Art. 7 NHG)
Mobile Antenna Permit Appeal Remanded for Expert Assessment
Cited in the context of the required assessment by the FOT regarding the necessity of an expert opinion mentioned in the case background, which justified the remand.