351.1 IRSGEIMPAIMP

CH

Art. 89 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Wirkungen

IRSG; Vierter Teil: Stellvertretende Strafverfolgung; 1. Kapitel: Voraussetzungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (157 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 89 IRSG · Wirkungen

Übernimmt ein anderer Staat die Strafverfolgung, so dürfen die schweizerischen Behörden gegen den Verfolgten wegen derselben Tat keine weiteren Massnahmen ergreifen: a. solange der ersuchte Staat nicht mitgeteilt hat, dass er nicht in der Lage sei, das Strafverfahren zu Ende zu führen; oder b. wenn aufgrund des in diesem Staat ergangenen Entscheides die Voraussetzungen nach Artikel 5 Buchstabe a oder b erfüllt sind.

Die Verjährung nach schweizerischem Recht ruht, solange im ersuchten Staat das Verfahren, einschliesslich des Strafvollzuges, hängig ist.

Wurde der Verfolgte wegen anderer Taten an den ersuchten Staat ausgeliefert, so braucht dieser die Auslieferungsbedingungen nach Artikel 38 nicht zu beachten, soweit er dem Ersuchen um Strafverfolgung entspricht.

← Art. 88 IRSG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Gegenstand Art. 90 IRSG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)

BB.2023.68 (Art. 89 IRSG)

Federal Criminal Court Orders Resumption of Investigation, Citing Violation of Plaintiffs' Right to Be Heard

Cited in relation to the transfer of criminal proceedings to another state.

RR.2013.22 (Art. 89 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)

Appeal Against Evidence Handover to Germany for Fraud Investigation Dismissed

Cited to clarify that this provision is not applicable to coercive measures taken in favor of the state conducting the criminal proceedings, as it pertains to preventing double prosecution by Swiss authorities after a transfer.

D.cision.2011.476 · vd (Art. 89 EIMP)

Federal Office of Justice Delegation Standing and Delay in Criminal Proceedings

This provision, cited in the preamble, outlines the effects of delegating criminal proceedings, relevant to the second part of the appeal which was declared inadmissible.

BK.2009.10 (art. 89 EIMP)

Swiss Prosecutor's Order for Costs Annulled After Foreign Proceedings Terminated

Used to determine that the Swiss authorities were no longer competent to resume proceedings after the French authorities had closed their investigation.

RR.2007.5 (art. 89 al. 1 let. a EIMP)

Release of Seized Assets in Delegated Criminal Proceedings

Cited to explain the conditions under which Swiss authorities are no longer competent after delegation of criminal proceedings.

RR.2007.5 (art. 89 al. 1 let. b EIMP)

Release of Seized Assets in Delegated Criminal Proceedings

Cited to explain the conditions under which Swiss authorities are no longer competent after delegation of criminal proceedings.

RR.2008.26 (Art. 89 EIMP)

Swiss Court Rules on Delegation of Prosecution and Seizure Order

Cited in the context of when a delegation decision takes effect, specifically that it requires the requested state to declare acceptance of the prosecution.

INC.2002.59402 · ti (art. 89 AIMP)

Appeal Regarding Refusal to Unseize Company Share Capital in Ongoing Fraud Investigation

Cited as a basis for the decision regarding the cessation of Swiss jurisdiction following the foreign authority taking over the proceedings.

TPF 2010 79 (Art. 89 al. 1 lit. b EIMP)

Swiss Criminal Jurisdiction Lost Upon Foreign Delegation: Costs Voided

Applied to determine that Swiss authorities should refrain from taking further measures because the foreign state had issued a decision of dismissal or non-suit.

INC.2002.59402 · ti (Art. 89 AIMP)

Company and Individuals v. Public Prosecutor (Seizure of Share Capital)

The provision dictates that Swiss authorities cannot take further action once the foreign State has assumed jurisdiction, which forms the basis for declaring the appeal inadmissible.