351.1
IRSGEIMPAIMP
CH
CH
Art. 76 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Inhalt und Unterlagen
IRSG; Dritter Teil: Andere Rechtshilfe; 2. Kapitel: Verfahren
Art. 76 IRSG · Inhalt und Unterlagen
Ausser den Angaben und Unterlagen nach Artikel 28 sind in einem Ersuchen aufzuführen oder ihm beizufügen: a. in Zustellungsersuchen: Name und Adresse des Empfängers und dessen Stellung im Verfahren sowie die Art des zuzustellenden Schriftstückes; b. den Ersuchen um Durchlieferung: eine der Urkunden nach Artikel 41; c. den Anträgen auf Durchsuchung von Personen oder Räumen, Beschlagnahme oder Herausgabe von Gegenständen: eine Bestätigung, dass diese Massnahmen im ersuchenden Staat zulässig sind.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
RR.2024.110 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Federal Criminal Court Upholds Bank Records Disclosure to Ukraine
Determined not to be applicable to the case due to the primary application of the ECHR.
RR.2023.170 (Art. 76 lett. c AIMP)
Ukraine Bank Records Transmission Case
Used to justify the reliance on the requesting state's confirmation regarding the necessity of a court order for obtaining documents.
RR.2022.72 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Croatia v. Swiss Bank Account Freeze for Corruption Investigation
This provision concerns the confirmation of the permissibility of measures in the requesting state. The court rejects the argument based on this provision because the relevant convention (EUeR) does not require such a confirmation and therefore it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
RR.2021.266 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Germany v. Swiss Resident (Tax Evasion Investigation)
Relates to the requirement for requesting authorities to confirm that measures like searches and seizures are permissible in the requesting state.
RR.2020.186 (Art. 76 lett. c AIMP)
Switzerland: Judicial Assistance Granted in Uruguay Fraudulent Insolvency Case
Relief from requiring a specific judicial authorization for seizure in the requesting state if the authority confirms its admissibility there.
RR.2017.23 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Switzerland-Oman Mutual Legal Assistance: Human Rights Safeguards Required for Bank Document Handover
Cited as a basis for the argument that a confirmation of the permissibility of coercive measures in the requesting state was missing, but this argument was rejected.
RR.2014.92 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Switzerland: Russia Legal Assistance Case - Corporate Rights and Procedural Limits
The court cited this article in its reasoning to dismiss the appellant's argument that a confirmation of the admissibility of coercive measures was missing from the request, stating that this requirement is not present in the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (EUeR), which is primarily applicable.
RR.2007.209 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Swiss Court Partially Grants Appeal on International Legal Assistance to Brazil Due to Insufficient Factual Detail
Cited as a basis for requiring confirmation that the requested coercive measures are permissible in the requesting state.
RR.2007.210 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
International Legal Assistance to Brazil: Sufficiency of Factual Description and Translation Issues
Cited as the basis for requiring confirmation that the requested coercive measures are permissible in the requesting state.
RR.2007.211 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Switzerland v. Brazil: Bank Document Disclosure Limited in International Legal Assistance Case
Applied to require a confirmation that the requested coercive measures are permissible in the requesting state, as the bank secrecy issue was raised.
RR.2007.208 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Brazil v. International Legal Assistance: Diamond Smuggling and Money Laundering Request Clarity
Used to request confirmation that the requested coercive measures are permissible in the requesting state.
RR.2007.209 (Art. 76 lit. c IRSG)
Swiss Court Partially Grants Appeal on International Legal Assistance to Brazil Due to Insufficient Factual Detail
Cited as the basis for requiring confirmation that the requested coercive measures are permissible in the requesting state.