351.1
IRSGEIMPAIMP
CH
CH
Art. 7 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Schweizer Bürger
IRSG; Erster Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 1. Kapitel: Geltungsbereich
Art. 7 IRSG · Schweizer Bürger
Kein Schweizer Bürger darf ohne seine schriftliche Zustimmung einem fremden Staat ausgeliefert oder zur Strafverfolgung oder Strafvollstreckung übergeben werden. Die Zustimmung kann bis zur Anordnung der Übergabe widerrufen werden.
Absatz 1 gilt nicht für die Durchlieferung und Rücklieferung eines Schweizer Bürgers, den ein anderer Staat vorübergehend den schweizerischen Behörden übergibt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (17)
A/2319/2008 · ge (Art. 7 AIMP)
Procurement Bid Deadline Adherence Obligation
Used to confirm the applicability of the AIMP to the public procurement procedure in question based on the contract value threshold.
A/685/2008 · ge (art. 7 AIMP)
Glazing Contract Award Appeal Refusal Due to Execution
Cited to discuss the application threshold for the intercantonal agreement on public procurement, which is relevant to the overall case but not directly used in the dispositive orders.
GE.2006.0023 · vd (art. 7 al. 1bis AIMP)
Hospital Foundation Linen Tender Annulled Over Discriminatory Criteria
Used in conjunction with Art. 5 al. 1 LVMP to determine the applicability of the intercantonal agreement thresholds.
A/2217/2006 · ge (art. 7 al. 1 AIMP)
Administrative Court Grants Suspensive Effect to Procurement Appeal Despite Public Interest in Project Speed
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the admissibility of the appeal based on the threshold value.
A/2579/2004 · ge (art. 7 al. 1 let. a AIMP)
Contract Award Challenge Inadmissible Due to Procurement Threshold
This provision defining the threshold for the AIMP's application was used to conclude that the AIMP did not apply in this case, leading to the inadmissibility of the appeal.
TA.2003.134 · ne (art. 7 al.1 litt.a AIMP)
Consortium Challenge to Public Contract Award Based on Post-Submission Price Modification
Used to establish that the market value met the AIMP threshold.
A/930/2002 · ge (article 7 alinéa premier lettre b AIMP)
Challenge Against UN Architectural Contract Award Due to Procurement Violations
This article was cited by the defendant authority to argue the threshold for the agreement's applicability was not met, which the court ultimately found irrelevant to the final judgment's grounds but was part of the procedural admissibility check.
A/1187/2001 · ge (art. 7 al. 1 lettre b AIMP)
Public Contract Award Judicial Review and Documentation Deadline Compliance
Cited to confirm that the appeal was receivable based on the contract value exceeding the threshold specified in this article.
A/201/2001 · ge (art. 7 al. 1 lettre b AIMP)
Facade Tender Appeal Suspension Granted Due to Procedural Irregularities
Cited to confirm the receivability of the appeal based on the market value exceeding the specified threshold.
GE.2000.0136 · vd (Art. 7 al. 1 lit. b AIMP)
Professional Associations v. State Regarding Contract Award Procedures
This provision determines that the CVSE mandate should, in principle, have been subject to a public tender procedure, leading to the annulment of its award.
A/670/2000 · ge (art. 7 al. 1 lettre b AIMP)
Engineers' Appeal of Public Works Contract Award Dismissed Due to Bid Value Falling Below Threshold
Cited to define the monetary threshold for the AIMP's application to supplies and services.
A/131/2000 · ge (art. 7 al. 1 AIMP)
Appeal against Rejection of Public Works Bid Based on Procedural Defect Deemed Inadmissible Due to Procurement Threshold Exclusion
This article was cited to establish that the AIMP (Intercantonal Agreement on Public Procurement) was not applicable to the public contract in question, thereby leading to the application of the local regulation mentioned in the dispositive.
A/749/1999 · ge (art. 7 de l'AIMP)
Architectural Firm Exclusion in School Tender for Missing Register Extract
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the applicability of the agreement based on the estimated value of the contract, but not cited in the dispositive orders themselves.
A/650/1999 · ge (article 7 AIMP)
Hospice Contract Award Inadmissibility and Reckless Litigation Sanction
Cited extensively in the reasoning to determine the applicable law based on the market value, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
TA.1998.114 · ne (Art. 7 al.1 litt.b et c AIMP)
Bidder Challenge to Catering Contract Award Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the applicability of the AIMP based on the contract's thresholds.