351.1 IRSGEIMPAIMP

CH

Art. 64 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Zwangsmassnahmen

IRSG; Dritter Teil: Andere Rechtshilfe; 1. Kapitel: Voraussetzungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (157 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 64 IRSG · Zwangsmassnahmen

Massnahmen nach Artikel 63, welche die Anwendung prozessualen Zwanges erfordern, dürfen nur angeordnet werden, wenn aus der Darstellung des Sachverhalts hervorgeht, dass die im Ausland verfolgte Handlung die objektiven Merkmale eines nach schweizerischem Recht strafbaren Tatbestandes aufweist. Sie sind nach schweizerischem Recht durchzuführen.

Ist die im Ausland verfolgte Tat in der Schweiz straflos, sind Massnahmen nach Artikel 63, welche die Anwendung prozessualen Zwanges erfordern, zulässig: a. zur Entlastung des Verfolgten; b. zur Verfolgung von Taten, die sexuelle Handlungen mit Minderjährigen darstellen.

← Art. 63 IRSG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Gegenstand Art. 65 IRSG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (213)

RR.2025.171 (art. 64 al. 1 EIMP)

Switzerland Upholds Mutual Legal Assistance Request for Online Gambling and Money Laundering Investigation

Cited regarding the condition of double incrimination for coercive measures.

RR.2025.181 (Art. 64 cpv. 1 AIMP)

Switzerland: Mutual Legal Assistance for Italian Tax Fraud Investigation Upheld

Cited as the domestic legal provision expressing the principle of dual criminality.

RR.2025.172 (art. 64 al. 1 EIMP)

Switzerland v. German Extradition Applicant (Fraud, Theft, Forgery)

This provision concerns the condition of dual criminality in extradition proceedings.

RR.2025.19 (Art. 64 Abs. 1 IRSG)

Federal Court Upholds Legal Assistance to Ukraine in Embezzlement Probe

This provision governs when procedural coercive measures can be applied, and was considered in the context of the appeal's assessment of dual criminality.

RR.2025.21 (Art. 64 Abs. 1 IRSG)

Swiss Company Loses Appeal Over Evidence Handover to Ukraine

This provision is mentioned in the reasoning (E. 4.3.1) regarding the application of Swiss law for coercive measures, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.

RR.2025.89 (art. 64 al. 1 EIMP)

Swiss Bank Records Disclosure for French Money Laundering Investigation Upheld

This provision was used in conjunction with art. 5 ch. 1 let. a CEEJ to assess the condition of double incrimination.

RR.2025.28 (Art. 64 al. 1 EIMP)

Challenge to International Legal Assistance and Asset Seizure in Embezzlement Case Dismissed

Used to determine that the double incrimination condition was met for the transfer of banking information and seizure of assets.

RR.2024.33 (Art. 64 al. 1 EIMP)

Swiss Bank Ordered to Disclose Records in Dutch Money Laundering Probe

Cited in relation to the requirement of double criminality for mutual assistance.

RR.2024.66 (Art. 64 Abs. 1 IRSG)

Jersey v. Switzerland: International Legal Assistance for Money Laundering and Sanctions Violations

The court determined that the alleged conduct abroad met the objective elements of a criminal offense under Swiss law.

RR.2023.170 (Art. 64 cpv. 1 AIMP)

Ukraine Bank Records Transmission Case

Expresses the principle of dual criminality in domestic law.

RR.2023.34 (Art. 64 al. 1 EIMP)

Montenegro vs. Switzerland: Drug Trafficking Investigation and Asset Seizure

Establishes the condition of double criminality for mutual legal assistance.

RR.2023.16 (Art. 64 al. 1 EIMP)

Switzerland v. Portugal: Bank Records Transfer Upheld

Condition for granting mutual assistance, requiring the facts to correspond prima facie to an offense punishable under Swiss law.

RR.2023.90 (Art. 64 cpv. 1 AIMP)

Swiss Court Upholds Freezing of Bank Account in Indian Corruption Probe

Cited as the legal basis for the principle of dual punishability, requiring that the act pursued abroad constitute an offense under Swiss law.

RR.2023.122 (Art. 64 cpv. 1 AIMP)

Ukraine v. Swiss Bank Insolvency Embezzlement Fishing Expedition

Cited as a substantive ground for the principle of dual criminality.

RR.2022.18 (Art. 64 al. 1 EIMP)

Swiss Foundation Appeal Against Brazil Transfer of Corruption Funds Dismissed

Cited as the basis for ordering coercive measures such as the handover of documents and values, requiring prima facie correspondence with a Swiss offense.