Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
351.1 IRSGEIMPAIMP CH

Art. 39 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Ausdehnung

IRSG; Zweiter Teil: Auslieferung; 1. Kapitel: Voraussetzungen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (157 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 39 IRSG · Ausdehnung

Wird der Ausgelieferte weiterer strafbarer Handlungen bezichtigt, so kann dem Staat, an den er ausgeliefert wurde, auf erneutes Ersuchen gestattet werden, auch diese Taten zu ahnden.

← Art. 38 IRSG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Gegenstand Art. 40 IRSG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)

A1 24 172 · vs (art. 39 al. 4 AIMP)
Appeal Against Public Procurement Award Due to Procedural Irregularities and Unequal Treatment
Cited in the reasoning section, but not explicitly in the dispositive, concerning the minutes of rectification.
RR.2024.55 (Art. 39 IRSG)
Extradition to Austria for Drug Trafficking Upheld
Cited to explain the procedure for requesting extradition for additional offenses.
RR.2023.41 (Art. 39 EIMP)
Extradition for Drug Offenses Upheld Due to Sufficient Detail
Cited in the dispositive to deny the request for legal aid.
RR.2020.183 (art. 39 et 55 EIMP)
Extradition Extension Upheld Despite Specialty Principle Concerns
These articles concern the extension of extradition and are cited as the legal basis for the decision of the Federal Office of Justice to grant the extension.
RR.2019.352 (Art. 39 EIMP)
Appeal Against Extension of Extradition Dismissed for Lack of Motivation
The provision allows for an appeal against the OFJ's decision to grant an extradition extension.
RR.2018.73 (art. 39 EIMP)
Extradition Extension for VAT Fraud Upheld
Used to address the claim of violation of the principle of specialty in the context of extradition extension.
RR.2018.73 (art. 39 EIMP)
Extradition Extension for VAT Fraud Upheld
Used to rule on the admissibility of the appeal against the decision to extend extradition.
RR.2018.27 (art. 39 al. 2 let. b en lien avec l’art. 37 al. 2 let. a LAOP et de l’art. 12 EIMP)
Malaysia v. Swiss Bank Secrecy: Bribery Investigation and International Legal Assistance
Cited as the basis for applying the procedural rules on costs and legal aid from the PA.
RR.2013.34 (Art. 39 IRSG)
Germany v. [Defendant Name]: Extradition for Embezzlement Upheld
This provision implies that if the requesting state wishes to prosecute for other offenses, a new extradition request must be submitted.
RR.2012.213 (art. 39, 55 al. 3 et 25 al. 1 EIMP)
Untimely Appeal of Extended Extradition Dismissed
Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals to rule on the extension of extradition.
RR.2012.48 (Art. 39 IRSG)
Extradition to Germany for Assault Upheld
Cited to explain that a new request for extradition would be necessary if Germany wanted to prosecute for other offenses.
60.2007.148 · ti (art. 39 AIMP)
Prosecutor's Decision to Charge Defendant with Non-Extradited Offenses Upheld Pending Extension Request
Cited in the reasoning as the equivalent of Art. 14 CEEstr regarding the speciality principle, and referenced in the general citation of applicable norms in the pronouncement preamble.