351.1
IRSGEIMPAIMP
CH
CH
Art. 36 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Sonderfälle
IRSG; Zweiter Teil: Auslieferung; 1. Kapitel: Voraussetzungen
Art. 36 IRSG · Sonderfälle
Ausnahmsweise kann der Verfolgte für eine Tat, die der schweizerischen Gerichtsbarkeit unterliegt, ausgeliefert werden, wenn besondere Umstände, namentlich die Möglichkeit der besseren sozialen Wiedereingliederung, dies rechtfertigen.
Ist eine von mehreren strafbaren Handlungen ein Auslieferungsdelikt (Art. 35 Abs. 1), so kann für alle ausgeliefert werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (27)
RR.2025.191 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Switzerland Upholds Extradition Request Despite Applicant's Claims of Minimal Involvement and Social Integration
Cited as an exception allowing extradition for an offense subject to Swiss jurisdiction under special circumstances, such as better social reintegration.
RR.2024.55 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition to Austria for Drug Trafficking Upheld
Cited as an exception allowing extradition even if the offense is subject to Swiss jurisdiction, under special circumstances.
RR.2024.52 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition to Austria upheld: Drug trafficking charges proceed.
Allows for extradition in exceptional circumstances for offenses subject to Swiss jurisdiction, if justified.
RR.2024.45 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition Upheld Despite Swiss Jurisdiction Claim and Family Life Arguments
Cited as an exception allowing extradition even if the offense falls under Swiss jurisdiction, based on specific circumstances.
RR.2021.174 (Art. 36 cpv. 1 AIMP)
Extradition to Italy for Mafia Association and Fraudulent Transfers Upheld
This article provides for exceptional circumstances for refusal of extradition, which the court found not to be present.
RR.2019.259 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition to Croatia for Drug Trafficking Upheld
The court used this provision to assess whether exceptional circumstances justified the extradition of the applicant for offenses under Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2017.264 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition Upheld Despite Minor Detail Deficiencies; Alibi Defense Rejected
This provision deals with situations where Switzerland might have concurrent jurisdiction, which the court addressed in relation to the extradition.
RR.2016.184 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
*Belhaj v. Public Prosecutor's Office of the Canton of Zurich*
Cited as a provision allowing for extradition in exceptional circumstances even if the offense is subject to Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2016.189 (Art. 36 IRSG)
Extradition to Italy for 'Ndrangheta Membership Upheld
Cited in the context of assessing whether an exceptional extradition is justified when the offense falls under Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2016.205 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition to Italy for Organized Crime Upheld; Legal Aid Denied
Cited as the basis for exceptional extradition even if the offense falls under Swiss jurisdiction, requiring consideration of specific circumstances.
RR.2016.251 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition to Italy for 'Ndrangheta charges upheld
Cited to address the situation where the offense is also subject to Swiss jurisdiction, allowing for exceptional extradition.
RR.2016.260 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition Upheld Despite Minor Error and Organized Crime Arguments
Used to assess whether extradition should be granted exceptionally even if the offense falls under Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2016.273 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Switzerland Upholds Extradition to Italy for Mafia Membership
Cited as the legal basis for refusing extradition under exceptional circumstances when the act falls under Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2016.295 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Switzerland v. Italy: Extradition for Organized Crime Upheld
Used to determine whether exceptional circumstances justify extradition despite the offense falling under Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2016.315 (Art. 36 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition Upheld: 'Ndrangheta Membership and Human Rights Claims Rejected
Cited as a discretionary ground for refusing extradition when the offense falls under Swiss jurisdiction.