351.1
IRSGEIMPAIMP
CH
CH
Art. 35 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Auslieferungsdelikte
IRSG; Zweiter Teil: Auslieferung; 1. Kapitel: Voraussetzungen
Art. 35 IRSG · Auslieferungsdelikte
Die Auslieferung ist zulässig, wenn nach den Unterlagen des Ersuchens die Tat: a. nach dem Recht sowohl der Schweiz als auch des ersuchenden Staates mit einer freiheitsbeschränkenden Sanktion im Höchstmass von mindestens einem Jahr oder mit einer schwereren Sanktion bedroht ist; und b. nicht der schweizerischen Gerichtsbarkeit unterliegt.
Bei der Beurteilung der Strafbarkeit nach schweizerischem Recht werden nicht berücksichtigt: a. dessen besondere Schuldformen und Strafbarkeitsbedingungen; b. die Bedingungen des persönlichen und zeitlichen Geltungsbereichs des Strafgesetzbuches und des Militärstrafgesetzes vom 13. Juni 1927 hinsichtlich der Strafvorschriften über Völkermord, Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit und Kriegsverbrechen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (106)
RR.2025.191 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b IRSG)
Switzerland Upholds Extradition Request Despite Applicant's Claims of Minimal Involvement and Social Integration
Cited in relation to the admissibility of extradition when the offense is not subject to Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2025.163 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition Upheld Despite In Absentia Trial Concerns
Cited as a basis for the obligation to extradite based on the penalty imposed.
RR.2025.102 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)
Switzerland Extradites Father to Germany for Child Support Evasion
Cited in conjunction with Art. 1 and 2 EAUe to establish the dual criminality requirement for extradition.
SB230588 · zh (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)
Relevancy, Jurisdiction, and Coercion Appeal
Cited in conjunction with Art. 7 Abs. 1 StGB to establish Swiss jurisdiction for offenses committed abroad based on extradition criteria.
RR.2024.117 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Switzerland Extradites Individual to Germany Despite Personal and Health Claims
Cited as a condition for extradition, requiring offenses to be punishable by at least one year of imprisonment in both states.
RR.2024.55 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b IRSG)
Extradition to Austria for Drug Trafficking Upheld
Cited as the legal basis for refusing extradition if the offense is not subject to Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2024.51 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 IRSG)
Extradition Upheld: Offense Covered, Human Rights Protected
Cited as a condition for extradition based on dual criminality.
RR.2024.52 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b IRSG)
Extradition to Austria upheld: Drug trafficking charges proceed.
Establishes that extradition is permissible if the offense, according to the request's documents, is not subject to Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2024.45 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b IRSG)
Extradition Upheld Despite Swiss Jurisdiction Claim and Family Life Arguments
Cited in relation to the argument that extradition is inadmissible if the offense falls under Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2023.53 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)
Federal Criminal Court Dismisses Extradition Appeal to Kosovo
Cited as the condition for dual criminality, which is met in this case.
907----------- · vd (Art. 35 al. 1 EIMP)
Case Remanded for Investigation Based on Acquired Swiss Nationality
Cited in the reasoning leading to the application of Art. 7 al. 1 let. c CP regarding the possibility of extradition.
RR.2022.122 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. b IRSG)
Extradition to Belgium Upheld Despite Concerns Over Prison Conditions and Procedure
Allows extradition if the offense is not subject to Swiss jurisdiction.
RR.2022.90 (Art. 35 al. 1 EIMP)
Extradition to France Upheld Despite Rights and Formal Defect Claims
Cited as the basis for determining which offenses are extraditable based on penalty thresholds.
RR.2022.14 (art. 35 cpv. 1 lett. b AIMP)
Extradition to Italy for Drug Trafficking Upheld
Cited in relation to the principle that the requested state may refuse extradition if the offense was committed wholly or partly on its territory.
RR.2021.198 (Art. 35 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)
Extradition to Armenia Upheld Despite Human Rights Concerns
Cited as the legal basis for determining the admissibility of extradition based on dual criminality.