351.1
IRSGEIMPAIMP
CH
CH
Art. 30 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Schweizerische Ersuchen
IRSG; Erster Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 4. Kapitel: Zwischenstaatliches Verfahren
Art. 30 IRSG · Schweizerische Ersuchen
Die schweizerischen Behörden dürfen an einen andern Staat keine Ersuchen richten, denen sie selbst nach diesem Gesetz nicht entsprechen könnten.
Für Ersuchen um Auslieferung oder um Übernahme der Strafverfolgung oder der Vollstreckung ist das BJ zuständig; es handelt auf Antrag der ersuchenden schweizerischen Behörde.
Bedingungen, die der ersuchte Staat an die Ausführung eines Ersuchens knüpft, sind von den schweizerischen Behörden zu beachten.
Das BJ kann von einem Ersuchen absehen, wenn die Bedeutung der Tat die Durchführung des Verfahrens nicht rechtfertigt.
Das BJ orientiert die ersuchende schweizerische Behörde umgehend, wenn der ersuchte Staat für eine beantragte Rechtshilfemassnahme eine richterliche Anordnung verlangt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
ADM 2025 159 · ju (art. 30 al. 1 AIMP)
Cyber Administration Platform Redevelopment Tender Challenge Rejected
This provision relates to the technical specifications that must be fixed in the call for tenders, which is relevant to the appellant's argument about the restrictive nature of the tender.
RR.2021.299 (Art. 30 al. 1 EIMP)
Federal Office of Justice v. Extradition Request for War Crimes
Cited as the legal provision violated by the OFJ's decision to refuse the international search request, forming the main ground for allowing the appeal.
RR.2017.189 (Art. 30 al. 1 EIMP)
Switzerland Denies Espionage Probe Assistance From France Over Political Offense Classification
Establishes the principle that Swiss authorities cannot send a request to a foreign state that they could not fulfill themselves under the EIMP, which includes rejecting requests related to political offenses.
RR.2018.173 (Art. 30 al. 1 EIMP)
Federal Court Upholds FOJ's Withdrawal of Judicial Assistance Request in Espionage Case
Applied to grant the request for judicial assistance only if the requesting state ensures reciprocity, especially in cases of political offenses.
RR.2018.173 (Art. 30 al. 1 EIMP)
Federal Court Upholds FOJ's Withdrawal of Judicial Assistance Request in Espionage Case
Cited by the OFJ to justify withdrawing the request for judicial assistance due to the political nature of the offenses.
D.cision.2016.447 · vd (Art. 30 al. 2 EIMP)
Refusal to Initiate International Judicial Assistance for Fraud Assets in India Not Appealable Before Cantonal Court
Cited in the initial section, though the decision ultimately rules on admissibility under a different procedural ground.
RR.2013.42 (art. 30 EIMP)
Extradition to France for Robbery and Related Offenses Upheld
Cited in relation to the appeal against the OFJ's decision on delegation of prosecution.
RR.2013.44 (art. 30 EIMP)
Switzerland v. Extradition for Explosives Robbery and Car Thefts
This provision is cited as the legal basis for the appeal against the OFJ's decision to delegate criminal proceedings.
RR.2012.180 (art. 30 cpv. 3 AIMP)
Swiss Court Blocks Transmission of Evidence Due to Violation of Luxembourg's Conditions
Basis for the principle that Swiss authorities must observe the conditions imposed by the requested state when executing a rogatory commission.
RR.2007.5 (art. 30 al. 2 EIMP)
Release of Seized Assets in Delegated Criminal Proceedings
Cited to establish the competence of the Federal Office of Justice (OFJ) to decide on the fate of sequestrated assets during the delegation of proceedings abroad.
VPB 78-233 (Art. 30 Abs. 2 IRSG)
Parliamentary Initiatives and Procedural Reform
Cited to establish the competence of the Federal Office of Police for extradition requests.
TPF 2023 55 (Art. 30 al. 1 EIMP)
National Prosecuting Authority v. Federal Office of Justice (Switzerland Extradition)
Cited to argue that the OFJ's decision exceeded its competence and that the MPC's interpretation of Art. 264m CP was not contrary to this provision.