351.1 IRSGEIMPAIMP

CH

Art. 2 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Ausländisches Verfahren

IRSG; Erster Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 1. Kapitel: Geltungsbereich

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (157 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 2 IRSG · Ausländisches Verfahren

Einem Ersuchen um Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen wird nicht entsprochen, wenn Gründe für die Annahme bestehen, dass das Verfahren im Ausland: a. den in der Europäischen Konvention vom 4. November 1950 zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten oder im Internationalen Pakt vom 16. Dezember 1966 über bürgerliche und politische Rechte festgelegten Verfahrensgrundsätzen nicht entspricht; b. durchgeführt wird, um eine Person wegen ihrer politischen Anschauungen, wegen ihrer Zugehörigkeit zu einer bestimmten sozialen Gruppe oder aus Gründen der Rasse, Religion oder Volkszugehörigkeit zu verfolgen oder zu bestrafen; c. dazu führen könnte, die Lage des Verfolgten aus einem unter Buchstabe b angeführten Grunde zu erschweren; oder d. andere schwere Mängel aufweist.

← Art. 1a IRSG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Gegenstand Art. 3 IRSG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (358)

VPB 95-068 (Art. 2 al. 1 EIMP)

Swiss Cooperation with International Criminal Tribunals

This article is referenced to establish the analogy with the federal law on international mutual assistance in criminal matters (EIMP) for cooperation with international tribunals, indicating its direct application in the final orders.

RR.2025.180 (Art. 2 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)

Switzerland Upholds Extradition to Poland, Dismissing Article 8 and Article 6/3 ECHR Claims

Cited as the legal basis for refusing extradition if the foreign proceedings do not comply with fundamental rights principles.

RR.2025.180 (Art. 2 Abs. 1 lit. d IRSG)

Switzerland Upholds Extradition to Poland, Dismissing Article 8 and Article 6/3 ECHR Claims

Cited as the legal basis for refusing extradition if the foreign proceedings have other serious deficiencies.

RR.2026.12 (Art. 2 EIMP)

Extradition to Romania Upheld by Federal Criminal Court

This provision states that a request for judicial assistance is inadmissible if the procedure abroad does not comply with the principles of procedure set forth by the ECHR and the ICCPR.

RR.2025.19 (Art. 2 IRSG)

Federal Court Upholds Legal Assistance to Ukraine in Embezzlement Probe

This provision concerns grounds for refusal of legal aid, particularly in cases where the foreign proceedings do not comply with fundamental procedural principles or violate public policy, and was extensively discussed in the appeal.

RR.2025.21 (Art. 2 IRSG)

Swiss Company Loses Appeal Over Evidence Handover to Ukraine

This provision is discussed in the reasoning (E. 6.1, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4, 6.3) concerning procedural deficiencies in the foreign proceedings, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.

RR.2025.162 (Art. 2 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)

Switzerland v. Argentina: Extradition for Cocaine Trafficking Upheld

Cited to explain why cooperation in criminal matters can be refused due to the risk of human rights violations in the requesting state.

RR.2025.197 (Art. 2 IRSG)

Appeal Against Extradition Order to Croatia Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence of Human Rights Violations

Cited as the legal basis for refusing international legal assistance if there are reasons to believe that the foreign proceedings do not comply with procedural principles of the ECHR or the ICCPR, or exhibit other serious defects.

RR.2025.138 (Art. 2 EIMP)

Federal Court Approves Extradition to Romania Amidst Prison Condition Concerns

This provision aims to prevent Switzerland from assisting in extradition procedures that do not guarantee a minimum standard of protection of fundamental rights.

RR.2025.132 (Art. 2 lett. d AIMP)

Vatican Asset Confiscation Overturned Due to Due Process Violations

Used to refuse the rogatory request because there were serious deficiencies in the foreign procedure, specifically a clear, serious, and insurmountable violation of the right to be heard and the right to adversarial proceedings.

RR.2025.163 (Art. 2 lit. a IRSG)

Extradition Upheld Despite In Absentia Trial Concerns

Cited to ensure that foreign proceedings do not violate fundamental procedural principles of the ECHR.

RR.2025.161 (Art. 2 AIMP)

Switzerland Extradition Appeal Dismissed: No Service in Switzerland, Italian Proceedings Valid

Cited as a ground for inadmissibility of a request for international judicial assistance if the foreign proceeding does not comply with procedural principles of the ECHR or the UN Covenant II.

RR.2025.86 (art. 2 EIMP)

Federal Court Upholds Rejection of French Extradition Request

This provision aims to prevent Switzerland from assisting in proceedings that do not guarantee a minimum standard of protection of fundamental rights.

RR.2025.103 (Art. 2 let. a EIMP)

Extradition to Austria Confirmed Despite Alibi and Safety Claims

Defines grounds for refusing extradition, including risks to physical integrity.

ADM 2025 159 · ju (art. 2 AIMP)

Cyber Administration Platform Redevelopment Tender Challenge Rejected

This provision outlines the principles of public procurement, including economic use of public funds, transparency, equal treatment, and fair competition, which are relevant to assessing the merits of the appeal and the grounds for granting suspensive effect.