351.1 IRSGEIMPAIMP

CH

Art. 17 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Bundesbehörden

IRSG; Erster Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 3. Kapitel: Innerstaatliches Verfahren

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (157 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 17 IRSG · Bundesbehörden

Das Eidgenössische Justiz- und Polizeidepartement (Departement) entscheidet im Fall von Artikel 1 a. Um einen Entscheid des Departements kann bis 30 Tage nach der schriftlichen Mitteilung der Schlussverfügung ersucht werden.

Das BJ nimmt die Ersuchen des Auslands entgegen und stellt die schweizerischen Ersuchen. Es behandelt Ersuchen um Auslieferung und veranlasst die Prüfung von Ersuchen um andere Rechtshilfe, stellvertretende Strafverfolgung oder Vollstreckung von Strafentscheiden durch die zuständigen kantonalen oder Bundesbehörden, sofern ihre Ausführung nicht offensichtlich unzulässig ist.

Es entscheidet über: a. das Einholen der Zusicherung des Gegenrechts (Art. 8 Abs. 1); b. die Wahl des geeigneten Verfahrens (Art. 19); c. die Zulässigkeit schweizerischer Ersuchen (Art. 30 Abs. 1).

Es kann die Durchführung eines Verfahrens ganz oder teilweise der Bundesbehörde übertragen, die bei Begehung der Tat in der Schweiz für die Ahndung zuständig wäre.

Es kann auch über die Zulässigkeit der Rechtshilfe und die Ausführung gemäss Artikel 79 a entscheiden.

← Art. 16 IRSG Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Gegenstand Art. 17a IRSG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (349)

A/1804/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Contractor's Appeal Denied Interim Relief in Public Works Award Challenge

The court applied this article to determine whether to grant the suspensive effect to the appeal, as it allows the appeal authority to grant such effect if the appeal appears sufficiently founded.

A/1902/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 1 AIMP)

Appeal Regarding Public Contract Award for Green Space Management Plan

Cited to establish the general rule that the appeal does not have suspensive effect.

A/1902/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Appeal Regarding Public Contract Award for Green Space Management Plan

This provision sets the condition (the appeal must seem sufficiently founded) for the appeal body to grant a suspensive effect, which was the main subject of this decision.

A/1889/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Challenge to Direct Award of Public Contract Following Tender Cancellation Due to Ambiguous Exclusion Criteria

The court granted the request for the suspension of effect because the appeal appeared sufficiently founded prima facie, as stipulated by this provision.

A/1415/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Municipality Contract Award Transparency Challenge

The court granted the request to suspend the decision by exercising the power to grant suspensive effect to the appeal.

A/522/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Appeal Against Public Works Contract Award Denied Suspensive Effect

Cited as the basis for the reviewing authority to grant suspensive effect upon request.

RR.2024.66 (Art. 17 Abs. 4 IRSG)

Jersey v. Switzerland: International Legal Assistance for Money Laundering and Sanctions Violations

The court referred to this article in the factual background concerning the transmission of the request to the Office of the Attorney General.

A/158/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Bid Challenge Refused for Lack of Prima Facie Merit and Public Interest in Project Completion

Cited as the legal basis under which the appellate body can grant the suspensive effect to the appeal.

A/11/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Refusal to Suspend Appeal Against Funeral Software Procurement Award

This provision was used to determine the court's authority to grant a stay of execution (effet suspensif) upon request.

A/389/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 1 AIMP)

Bid Exclusion Challenge Denied in Public Procurement Case

Cited to establish that the appeal does not have suspensive effect by default.

A/389/2025 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Bid Exclusion Challenge Denied in Public Procurement Case

Cited as the basis under which the appellate authority can grant suspensive effect to the appeal, although ultimately denied.

RR.2024.142 (Art. 17 cpv. 2 AIMP)

Extradition Consent Validity and Timeliness After Federal Office Authorization

The court cited this provision to confirm that the letter to the Czech Ministry of Justice constituted a valid authorization for surrender.

A/3543/2024 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Public Tender Exclusion Upheld Due to Missing Subcontractor Attestations

Cited in the reasoning leading to the decision to refuse the stay of execution, as it establishes the court's power to grant the effect.

A/3478/2024 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Suspension Granted on Bidder Exclusion Based on Incorporation Date Due to Predecessor Continuity

Cited as part of the legal basis allowing the reviewing authority to grant a suspensive effect to the appeal.

A/3252/2024 · ge (art. 17 al. 2 AIMP)

Administrative Exclusion Upheld: Failure to Submit Mandatory Insurance Documents in Public Tender

This article grants the review authority the power to grant suspensive effect to the appeal.