351.1
IRSGEIMPAIMP
CH
CH
Art. 16 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Kantonale Behörden
IRSG; Erster Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 3. Kapitel: Innerstaatliches Verfahren
Art. 16 IRSG · Kantonale Behörden
Die Kantone wirken bei der Durchführung des Auslieferungsverfahrens mit. Wenn das Bundesrecht nichts anderes bestimmt, obliegt ihnen die Ausführung von Ersuchen um andere Rechtshilfe, die stellvertretende Strafverfolgung und die Vollstreckung von Strafentscheiden. Sie unterstehen der Aufsicht des Bundes, soweit dieses Gesetz anzuwenden ist.
...
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (51)
A/1705/2024 · ge (art. 16 al. 2 AIMP)
Construction Company Bid Rejection Upheld for Non-Conforming Wood Specification
Cited to reinforce the prohibition against judicial substitution of the contracting authority's discretionary power.
A/3632/2023 · ge (art. 16 al. 2 AIMP)
Challenge to Public Contract Award Based on Undisclosed Price Evaluation Weighting
Cited in the context of limiting judicial review over the awarding authority's discretion.
602 2022 220 · fr (art. 16 al. 1 AIMP 1994)
Construction Company Appeal of Contract Award Rejection
Cited in the reasoning concerning the grounds for appeal, which justifies the court's review of the merits.
602 2022 139 · fr (art. 16 al. 1 AIMP 1994)
Appeal Dismissed: Termination of Snow Removal Procurement Due to Overpriced Bid
Cited to establish the grounds for appeal before the Cantonal Tribunal, which include violation of law or abuse of discretion.
602 2022 88 · fr (art. 16 al. 1 AIMP 1994)
Appeal Regarding Public Works Contract Award Split into Tranches
Cited as the legal basis allowing an appeal to the Cantonal Court for violation of the law or incorrect statement of facts.
602 2022 94 · fr (art. 16 al. 1 AIMP 1994)
Procurement Appeal Over Automation Contract Award Dismissed Despite Authority's Calculation Errors
The court implicitly used this article's framework (violation of law, excess of power of appreciation) to review the merits of the appeal, although the final rejection was based on the substance of the evaluation.
A/4370/2020 · ge (art. 16 al. 2 AIMP)
Appeal Regarding Public Works Contract Award Due to Alleged Flaws in Evaluation Criteria
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prohibition of the judicial authority substituting its power of review for that of the adjudicator.
A/2308/2020 · ge (art. 16 AIMP)
Company Challenge to Premature Vehicle Recovery Contract Award Dismissed
Cited as part of the rule allowing an appeal for violation of law, though the appeal was ultimately rejected on the merits.
A/3713/2019 · ge (art. 16 al. 1 et 2 AIMP)
Public Contract Award Upheld Despite Lowest Bidder Loss Based on Superior Quality Metrics
Cited as the basis for challenging the decision for violation of law, including excess or abuse of discretionary power.
602 2019 146 · fr (Art. 16 al. 1 AIMP)
HVAC Contract Award Upheld Despite Right to Be Heard Challenge
Although cited in the reasoning for the basis of appeal, the final order confirms the decision which implies the grounds for appeal concerning the merits (violation of law/arbitrary power) were implicitly rejected based on the court's assessment regarding the application of the criteria.
602 2018 37 · fr (art. 16 al. 1 de l'accord intercantonal du 25 novembre 1994 sur les marchés publics (AIMP; RSF 122.91.2))
Consortium Challenge to Exclusion from Public Works Contract Due to Insufficient Technical Proposal
Cited as the legal basis for the grounds of appeal (violation of law or inaccurate finding of facts) allowed before the Cantonal Tribunal.
602 2017 83 · fr (art. 16 de l’Accord intercantonal du 25 novembre 1994 sur les marché publics (AIMP; RSF 122.91.2))
Public Works Contract Award Challenge Based on Missing Technical Specifications
Cited to determine the grounds upon which the Cantonal Tribunal can review the appeal (violation of law or incorrect finding of facts).
602 2016 37 · fr (Art. 16 al. 1 AIMP)
Consortium Challenge to Library Renovation Contract Award Upheld
This article defines the grounds for appeal (violation of law or inaccurate finding of facts), which is the context for reviewing the merits of the case, although the appeal was ultimately rejected.
602 2016 37 · fr (art. 16 al. 2 AIMP)
Consortium Challenge to Library Renovation Contract Award Upheld
Cited in relation to the court's limited review scope regarding the merit of the decision.
A/2476/2016 · ge (art. 16 al. 1 AIMP)
Appeal Sustained: Annulment of Public Contract Award Due to Bidder's Formal Defects and Procedural Errors
Cited to confirm that appeals can be formed for violation of law or excess of discretionary power.