351.1
IRSGEIMPAIMP
CH
CH
Art. 13 Bundesgesetz vom 20. März 1981 über internationale Rechtshilfe in Strafsachen (IRSG) - Verjährungsunterbrechung . Strafantrag
IRSG; Erster Teil: Allgemeine Bestimmungen; 2. Kapitel: Anwendbares Recht
Art. 13 IRSG · Verjährungsunterbrechung . Strafantrag
In Verfahren nach diesem Gesetz werden in der Schweiz als wirksam angesehen: a. die nach dem Recht des ersuchenden Staates eingetretene Unterbrechung der Verjährung; b. der bei einer ausländischen Behörde fristgerecht gestellte Strafantrag, wenn er auch nach schweizerischem Recht erforderlich ist.
Ist ein Strafantrag nur nach schweizerischem Recht erforderlich, so darf eine Sanktion in der Schweiz nicht verhängt oder vollzogen werden, wenn der Verletzte Einspruch erhebt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (40)
A/2287/2024 · ge (art. 13 let i AIMP)
Bidder Challenge Against Tender Interruption Upheld
Cited in the reasoning establishing the legal basis that allows the interruption of the procedure only for just cause, which was used to assess the merits of the interruption.
A/1902/2025 · ge (art. 13 let. h AIMP)
Appeal Regarding Public Contract Award for Green Space Management Plan
Cited in the grounds to support the requirement for summary motivation of award decisions.
RR.2023.95 (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)
Extradition to Serbia for Attempted Murder Upheld Despite Statute of Limitations and Human Rights Claims
Cited for the recognition of interruption of the statute of limitations according to the law of the requesting state in Swiss proceedings.
602 2022 139 · fr (art. 13 let. i AIMP 1994)
Appeal Dismissed: Termination of Snow Removal Procurement Due to Overpriced Bid
Cited as the basis for Cantonal Decree (art. 34 RMP) allowing the interruption and repetition of the procedure in case of just cause.
A1 22 99 · vs (art. 13 al. 1 let. i AIMP)
Public Procurement Interruption Due to Substantial Cost Overrun
This article establishes the general legal basis for interrupting the tendering procedure in case of important reasons, cited in relation to the lower cantonal ordinance.
RR.2021.198 (Art. 13 Abs. 1 lit. a IRSG)
Extradition to Armenia Upheld Despite Human Rights Concerns
Cited concerning the recognition of interruption of prescription periods under the law of the requesting state.
A/2731/2021 · ge (Art. 13 let. h AIMP)
Annulment of Public Contract Award Due to Lack of Motivation and Insufficient Verification of Debtor's Solvency
Cited in conjunction with the right to be heard requirement for reasoned award decisions in public procurement.
A/3970/2017 · ge (art. 13 let. d AIMP)
Bidder Exclusion for Missing Mandatory Procurement Documentation
Cited in the final order as part of the reasoning for rejecting the appeal (objective and verifiable criteria for aptitude).
CDP.2016.27 · ne (art. 13 let. f AIMP)
Contract Award Upheld Despite Bidder's Prior Tender Involvement
Cited in the reasoning regarding the goal of cantonal implementing provisions for public procurement, but not in the operative orders.
A/325/2015 · ge (art. 13 al. 1 let. i AIMP)
Security Firm Challenge to Airport Procurement Termination Dismissed for Lack of Standing
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for important reasons to interrupt a procurement procedure.
CDP.2015.178 · ne (art. 13 let. i AIMP)
Municipality v. Heating/Ventilation Services Tender Interruption Justified by Flawed Requirements
This provision sets the requirement for cantonal legislation to allow for the interruption of the procedure in the presence of 'justes motifs' (just reasons), which the Court found were met in this case.
A/2894/2015 · ge (art. 13 let. h AIMP)
Bidder Appeal Against Multimedia Contract Award Rejection of Suspension
This provision is cited in the reasoning section (Considerant 5) discussing the requirement for the decision to be reasoned, which supports the decision to reject the request for suspensive effect.
A/1453/2012 · ge (art. 13 let. h AIMP)
Rejected Bidder Appeal Against Public Works Contract Award Denied
Cited in the context of the requirement for a summary justification of award decisions, which the court found was sufficiently met or remedied.
CDP.2012.334 · ne (art. 13 let. f AIMP)
Public Entity Disability Insurance Contract Award Annulled Due to Flawed Evaluation Methodology
Cited in the reasoning regarding the need for criteria that lead to the economically most advantageous offer.
RR.2012.198 (art. 13 al. 1 lit. a EIMP)
Federal Criminal Court Upholds Extradition to Kosovo
This article concerns the application of interruption of prescription acts according to the law of the requesting state in Swiss proceedings.