313.0 VSTRRDPA

CH

Art. 95 Bundesgesetz vom 22. März 1974 über das Verwaltungsstrafrecht (VStrR)

VStrR; Dritter Titel: Verwaltungsstrafverfahren; Sechster Abschnitt: Kosten, Entschädigung und Rückgriff; A. Kosten; I. Im Verfahren der Verwaltung; 2. Auferlegung

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (114 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 95 VStrR

Im Entscheid der Verwaltung werden die Kosten in der Regel dem Verurteilten auferlegt; aus Gründen der Billigkeit kann er von ihnen ganz oder teilweise befreit werden.

Wird das Verfahren eingestellt, so können dem Beschuldigten Kosten ganz oder teilweise auferlegt werden, wenn er die Untersuchung schuldhaft verursacht oder das Verfahren mutwillig wesentlich erschwert oder verlängert hat.

Mehrere Beschuldigte haften solidarisch für die Kosten, wenn der Strafbescheid oder die Strafverfügung nichts anderes bestimmt.

← Art. 94 VStrR Bundesgesetz vom 22. März 1974 über das Verwaltungsstrafrecht (VStrR) Art. 96 VStrR →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (29)

VPB 2003-06-10 (art. 2, 8, 62, 64, 94 et 95 DPA)

Federal Agency Fines Individual for Alcohol Regulation Violation

These provisions of the Administrative Penal Procedure Act are cited as part of the legal basis for the penalty order.

BV.2024.25 (art. 95 cpv. 1 DPA)

Appeal Court Reduces Gaming Commission's Procedural Costs Due to Procedural Irregularities and Financial Hardship

This provision allows for the reduction or waiver of costs for equity reasons, which was applied in assessing the appellant's financial situation.

BKBES.2024.92 · so (Art. 95 VStrR)

Federal Tax Administration v. Compensation for Discontinued Tax Evasion Proceedings

Governs cost allocation in administrative criminal proceedings, which is relevant for the basis of the cost decision orders.

SK.2019.13 (art. 95 al. 1 DPA)

Unauthorized Financial Intermediation and Willful Misconduct in Investment Schemes

Legal basis for charging procedural costs to the convicted party.

BV.2020.12 (Art. 95 Abs. 2 VStrR)

Tax Expert Costs Overturned Due to Presumption of Innocence

This provision governs the imposition of costs when criminal proceedings are discontinued, requiring justification that the investigation was culpably caused or significantly hampered due to wilfulness.

BV.2020.13 (Art. 95 Abs. 2 VStrR)

Tax Evasion Investigation Costs and Presumption of Innocence

This article is cited as the legal basis for imposing costs on the accused in cases where the proceedings are terminated, provided they have culpably caused the investigation or significantly complicated or prolonged it. The court used this provision to assess the justification for the cost allocation in the appealed decision.

STBER.2020.10 · so (Art. 95 Abs. 1 und 2 VStrR)

Illegal Casino Organization Conviction Upheld Despite Coercion Claim

Cited in the final orders, concerning the allocation of costs between the federal and cantonal authorities in cases involving administrative penalties.

BV.2020.4 (Art. 95 Abs. 2 VStrR)

Company Costs Overturned in Sanctions Investigation Termination

This provision allows for the imposition of costs on the accused if they have culpably caused the investigation or significantly complicated or prolonged the proceedings.

SU180032 · zh (Art. 95 Abs. 1 VStrR)

Federal Gaming Commission v. Slot Machine Operator

Applied in conjunction with Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO for imposing the administrative and first-instance court costs on the accused.

SK.2018.9 (art. 95 al. 1 DPA)

Switzerland: Fines for Unauthorized "Bank" Claims and Deposit Taking

States that the convicted defendant bears the costs of the administrative and judicial proceedings.

BV.2018.25 (Art. 95 Abs. 2 VStrR)

Taxpayer's Right to be Heard Upheld in Cost Order Appeal

This provision governs when costs can be imposed on the accused when proceedings are discontinued, and the court found it was improperly applied by the lower authority.

SU170022 · zh (Art. 95 Abs. 3 VstrR)

Violation of Gaming Act and Criminal Liability for Unauthorized Gambling Machine

Cited in the reasoning for deciding not to confirm the first instance's decision regarding the joint and several liability for the costs of the previous penalty order.

SK.2017.11 (art. 95 al. 1 DPA)

Unauthorized Financial Intermediation and Fund Transmission Conviction

Establishes that the convicted defendant bears the costs of the administrative criminal procedure.

SK.2014.14 (art. 95 al. 1 DPA)

Financial Intermediary Penalized for AML Violations

This provision was used to order that the defendant bear the costs of the proceedings.

BV.2014.16 (Art. 95 Abs. 1 VStrR)

Customs Costs upheld in Tax Evasion Case

States that the costs are generally imposed on the convicted person.