313.0
VSTRRDPA
CH
CH
Art. 73 Bundesgesetz vom 22. März 1974 über das Verwaltungsstrafrecht (VStrR)
VStrR; Dritter Titel: Verwaltungsstrafverfahren; Dritter Abschnitt: Gerichtliches Verfahren; A. Verfahren vor den kantonalen Gerichten; I. Einleitung
Art. 73 VStrR
Ist die gerichtliche Beurteilung verlangt worden oder hält das übergeordnete Departement die Voraussetzungen einer Freiheitsstrafe, einer freiheitsentziehenden Massnahme oder einer Landesverweisung nach Artikel 66 a oder 66 a bis des Strafgesetzbuchs für gegeben, so überweist die beteiligte Verwaltung die Akten der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft zuhanden des zuständigen Strafgerichts. Solange über die Leistungs- oder Rückleistungspflicht, die dem Strafverfahren zugrunde liegt, nicht rechtskräftig entschieden oder sie nicht durch vorbehaltlose Zahlung anerkannt ist, unterbleibt die Überweisung.
Die Überweisung gilt als Anklage. Sie hat den Sachverhalt und die anwendbaren Strafbestimmungen zu enthalten oder auf die Strafverfügung zu verweisen.
Eine Untersuchung gemäss StPO findet nicht statt; vorbehalten bleibt die Ergänzung der Akten gemäss Artikel 75 Absatz 2.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (22)
SK.2024.54 (Art. 73 Abs. 2 VStrR)
Illegally Accepting Public Deposits as Director
This provision is cited in the reasoning regarding the transfer of case files from the administrative authority to the court, which constitutes an indictment.
STBER.2021.42 · so (Art. 73 ff. VStrR)
Appeal Regarding Conviction for Repeated Unauthorized Gambling Operations
These provisions relate to the applicability of procedural rules in administrative penal law, referenced in the context of cost allocation.
SK.2020.55 (Art. 73 Abs. 2 VStrR)
Securities Dealer Without License Conviction Upheld
This provision is cited as defining what constitutes an indictment in administrative penal proceedings, specifically the transfer of files to the court.
SK.2021.16 (Art. 73 Abs. 1 Satz 2 VStrR)
Suspension of Forgery and Bribery Charges Pending Administrative CO2 Sanctions Ruling
This provision mandates that the transfer of a criminal case to the court must be postponed until the issue of the duty to pay or repay, which forms the basis of the criminal proceedings, has been finally decided.
Jug.2021.247 · vd (art. 73 ss DPA)
United States v. [Appellant Name] (Gambling Law Violation)
This provision governs the administrative penal procedure and is cited in the preamble of the final decision.
SK.2019.14 (Art. 73 Abs. 2 VStrR)
Defendant Liable for Unlawful Acceptance of Public Deposits
Defines the transfer of the penalty order as an indictment for the purpose of judicial proceedings.
SK.2019.28 (Art. 73 Abs. 3 VStrR)
Indictment Returned Due to Investigator Bias and Procedural Irregularities
Cited to explain the court's ability to supplement evidence and why it does not apply in this specific case.
SK.2018.15 (Art. 73 cpv. 2 DPA)
Acquittal in AMLA Reporting Obligation Case
Cited for the decision of the Federal Department of Finance serving as an indictment.
SK.2018.31 (art. 73 cpv. 2 DPA)
Negligent Acceptance of Unauthorized Public Deposits
States that penal decisions serve as the indictment and must outline the facts and applicable penal provisions.
TDSIO P1 14 21 · vs (art. 73 al. 1 DPA)
Company Fined for Unlicensed Electrical Work: Improper Application of Entity-Only Liability
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the proper transmission of the case from the administration to the public prosecutor, part of the procedural checks before the substantive decision.
TDSIO P1 14 21 · vs (art. 73 al. 2 DPA)
Company Fined for Unlicensed Electrical Work: Improper Application of Entity-Only Liability
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the admissibility of the referral for judgment, which was part of the procedural checks before the substantive decision.
SU130021 · zh (Art. 73 Abs. 2 VStrR)
Federal Electricity Act Violation Based on Unremedied Electrical Defects
Cited in the reasoning to indicate the source of the indictment, but not in the operative part.
SK.2010.4 (Art. 73 Abs. 2 VStrR)
Acquittal in Stock Disclosure Case Due to Lack of Proof of Group Formation
Cited to establish that the referral of the criminal rulings to the court constitutes an indictment.
CCP.2010.11 · ne (Art. 73 DPA)
Prosecutor v. Illegal Therapeutic Product Trader (Concrete Health Endangerment)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal.
40.2006.5 · ti (art. 73 segg. DPA)
Cross-Border Transport Monopoly Violation: Individual vs. Corporate Liability
Cited among the provisions on which the decision is based, relevant as the decision annuls an administrative penal decision and remands the case.