Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
313.0 VSTRRDPA CH

Art. 67 Bundesgesetz vom 22. März 1974 über das Verwaltungsstrafrecht (VStrR)

VStrR; Dritter Titel: Verwaltungsstrafverfahren; Zweiter Abschnitt: Untersuchung und Strafverfügung der Verwaltung; C. Einsprache; I. Einreichung
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (114 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 67 VStrR

Gegen den Straf- oder Einziehungsbescheid kann der Betroffene innert 30 Tagen seit der Eröffnung Einsprache erheben.

Wird innert der gesetzlichen Frist nicht Einsprache erhoben, so steht der Straf- oder Einziehungsbescheid einem rechtskräftigen Urteil gleich.

← Art. 66 VStrR Bundesgesetz vom 22. März 1974 über das Verwaltungsstrafrecht (VStrR) Art. 68 VStrR →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (111)

VPB 54-2006-2207 (art. 67, al. 1, DPA)
Confiscation of Illegal Gambling Device (Poker II Slot Machine)
Cited for the right to oppose the confiscation decision within thirty days of notification.
VPB 06-0719-2717 (art. 67, al. 1, DPA)
Confiscation of Illegal Gambling Machine
Cited to state the time limit for opposition to the confiscation decision.
VPB ndat-de-r-pression (art. 67 DPA)
Federal Commission v. Illegal Slot Machine Operator
This provision establishes the period and method for lodging an objection to the repression order.
VPB 2003-12-16 (art. 67 DPA)
Customs Penalty Order for VAT and Duty Violations
This provision is cited to explain the legal consequence of not filing an opposition, i.e., the repression order becomes final.
VPB 2003-06-10 (art. 67 DPA)
Federal Agency Fines Individual for Alcohol Regulation Violation
This provision is cited to explain the legal effect of not filing an opposition, assimilating the penalty order to a final judgment.
VPB 2002-11-12 (art. 67, al. 1, DPA)
Special Confiscation Order Against Unknown Party - Telecommunication Installation
This provision governs the time limit and method for filing an opposition to the confiscation order.
VPB 2002-11-12 (art. 67, al. 2, DPA)
Special Confiscation Order Against Unknown Party - Telecommunication Installation
This provision states that if no opposition is filed, the confiscation order becomes final.
VPB 2002-05-21 (Art. 67 DP A)
Notification of Penalty Order and Opposition Procedure
Cited to explain the legal effect of failing to file an opposition, making the penalty order equivalent to a final judgment.
VPB 2002-05-14 (art. 67 DP A)
Customs Penalty Notification: 7500 CHF for Tax and Animal Epidemic Violations
Cited to explain the legal consequence of not filing an opposition, equating the penal order to a final judgment.
VPB 5954-2001-2603 (art. 67 DPA)
Federal Tax Administration v. VAT Evasion
Cited to state that the reprimand order is considered final if no opposition is filed.
VPB 2001-10-30 (art. 67 DP A)
Customs Penalty Notification and Objection Process
States that an unchallenged penalty order is considered a legally binding judgment.
VPB 2001-10-09 (art. 67 DPA)
Administrative Penalty for Tax Evasion
Cited to establish that the penalty order becomes legally binding if no opposition is filed.
VPB 2001-06-05 (art. 67 DPA)
Federal Administration of Contributions v. Tax Evasion Case
Cited to explain the legal consequence of not filing an appeal.
VPB 2000.2489 (art. 67 DPA)
Customs Violation and VAT Law Penalties
This provision explains the consequence of not filing an opposition within the given timeframe.
VPB 2000.2493 (art. 67 DPA)
Customs Fine and VAT Appeal Dispute
This article states that if no opposition is filed within the time limit, the repression order is deemed a final judgment.