312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 94 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Wiederherstellung
StPO; 2. Titel: Strafbehörden; 8. Kapitel: Allgemeine Verfahrensregeln
Art. 94 StPO · Wiederherstellung
Hat eine Partei eine Frist versäumt und würde ihr daraus ein erheblicher und unersetzlicher Rechtsverlust erwachsen, so kann sie die Wiederherstellung der Frist verlangen; dabei hat sie glaubhaft zu machen, dass sie an der Säumnis kein Verschulden trifft.
Das Gesuch ist innert 30 Tagen nach Wegfall des Säumnisgrundes schriftlich und begründet bei der Behörde zu stellen, bei welcher die versäumte Verfahrenshandlung hätte vorgenommen werden sollen. Innert der gleichen Frist muss die versäumte Verfahrenshandlung nachgeholt werden.
Das Gesuch hat nur aufschiebende Wirkung, wenn die zuständige Behörde sie erteilt.
Über das Gesuch entscheidet die Strafbehörde in einem schriftlichen Verfahren.
Die Absätze 1–4 gelten sinngemäss bei versäumten Terminen. Wird die Wiederherstellung bewilligt, so setzt die Verfahrensleitung einen neuen Termin fest. Die Bestimmungen über das Abwesenheitsverfahren bleiben vorbehalten.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (753)
AbR.2006.07.Nr.22 · ow (Art. 94 Abs. 1 StPO)
Ski Resort Not Liable for Avalanche Injuries Due to Skiers' Negligence
Cited as the legal basis for discontinuing proceedings if it is foreseeable that the case would be dismissed.
SK.2025.52 (Art. 94 Abs. 1 StPO)
Applicant's Attempt to Re-enter Criminal Confiscation Proceeding Denied.
This provision is cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for requesting the reinstatement of deadlines, which is the main subject of the applicant's request, although the request itself is ultimately not granted.
BB.2025.114 (Art. 94 StPO)
Late Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Proof of Incapacity and Lack of Criminal Suspicion
This provision was cited in relation to the request for restoration of the appeal deadline, which was ultimately denied.
SBK.2025.240 · ag (Art. 94 Abs. 1 StPO)
Appellant's Appeal for Reinstatement Denied Due to Untimely Filing
Cited as the legal basis for requesting reinstatement of a deadline when the party is in default and suffers an irreparable loss, provided there is no fault.
51/2025/44 · sh (Art. 94 Abs. 1 StPO)
Appeal Deadline Reinstatement Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Faultless Delay
The appeal was dismissed because the requirements for the restoration of the objection period were not met.
PS/76/2025 · ge (art. 94 CPP)
Refusal to Reinstate Appeal Deadline Based on Erroneous Registration Number
The central provision regarding the requested relief (restitution of time limit), cited throughout the analysis of the main issue in point 3.
502 2025 205 · fr (art. 94 al. 1 CPP)
Public Prosecutor Refusal to Grant Restitution of Opposition Deadline Upheld
The provision setting the conditions for requesting the restitution of a procedural deadline was discussed, although the request was ultimately rejected based on the lack of non-faulty impediment under this article.
P/3260/2025 · ge (art. 94 al. 1 CPP)
Prosecutor's Refusal to Restore Penal Order Opposition Deadline Upheld
This provision governs the conditions for granting the restitution of a procedural deadline, which was the subject of the appeal.
P/4866/2025 · ge (art. 94 CPP)
Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing of Opposition to Penal Order
Mentioned in the dispositive as the provision the public prosecutor must examine regarding the appellant's request for restitution of the deadline.
BKBES.2025.126 · so (Art. 94 Abs. 1 StPO)
Complainant v. Accused: Appeal of Settlement Dismissal
Cited in the reasoning that leads to the rejection of the request for reinstatement of the time limit, although the order itself only confirms the rejection.
P/4986/2025 · ge (Art. 94 CPP)
Appeal Security Deposit Reinstatement Denial
The court rejected the request for re-establishment of time limits based on the conditions stipulated in this article.
P/4986/2025 · ge (Art. 94 CPP)
Appeal Security Deposit Reinstatement Denial
This article is listed in the norms section but was not explicitly used in the dispositive orders, therefore it is excluded.
ARMP.2025.97 · ne (Art. 94 CPP)
Appeal Against Annulment of Penal Order in Domestic Violence Case
Cited extensively in the reasoning regarding the conditions for the restitution of a missed deadline, which was the core legal issue determining whether the opposition was valid (though the court ultimately rejected its application).
P/8478/2025 · ge (art. 94 CPP)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Formal Declaration
Cited in the reasoning regarding the refusal to grant a restitution of time limit for filing the appeal.
P/18915/2025 · ge (art. 94 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Opposition to Penalty Order
Cited when discussing the non-fulfillment of conditions for the restoration of the appeal deadline.