312.0
STPOCPP
CH
Art. 92 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Erstreckung von Fristen und Verschiebung von Terminen
StPO; 2. Titel: Strafbehörden; 8. Kapitel: Allgemeine Verfahrensregeln
Art. 92 StPO · Erstreckung von Fristen und Verschiebung von Terminen
Die Behörden können von Amtes wegen oder auf Gesuch hin die von ihnen angesetzten Fristen erstrecken und Verhandlungstermine verschieben. Das Gesuch muss vor Ablauf der Frist gestellt werden und hinreichend begründet sein.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (51)
ZZ.1976.17 · so (§ 92 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 StPO)
Interrogation Record Keeping and Suggestive Questioning in Evidentiary Assessment
These provisions of the Penal Procedure Code were cited as the general legal basis relevant to the issues raised (protocol keeping and suggestive questioning).
502 2025 72 · fr (Art. 92 StPO)
Recusal of Police Judge Over Prior Case Involvement and Jurisdictional Challenge
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the authority of the court to extend deadlines upon request.
36469 · nw (Art. 92 StPO)
Appeal Dismissed: Insufficient Evidence for Damage, Withdrawn Complaint for Insult Due to Unpaid Security Deposit
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility of requesting an extension of the deadline for the security payment.
SST.2023.250 · ag (Art. 92 StPO)
Late Filing of Appeal Brief Leads to Dismissal and Cost Award
Governs the extension of deadlines, requiring requests to be made before the deadline expires.
SBK.2023.264 · ag (Art. 92 StPO)
Defense Counsel Appointment Upheld Despite Venue Stay; Extension Denial Justified
Cited in relation to the conditions for granting an extension of a deadline ('Notsituationen') or restoring a deadline.
636----------- · vd (Art. 92 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Rejection of Extension to Consult Case File Due to Insufficient Motivation
The subject matter of the underlying order being appealed (request for time extension) is governed by this article.
SBE.2023.5 · ag (Art. 92 StPO)
Appellant's Repeated Failure to Present Legally Sufficient Arguments Results in Dismissal of Appeal
Mentioned in the context of requesting a postponement of a hearing.
D.cision.2023.25 · vd (Art. 92 CPP)
Appellant v. Prosecutor Regarding Private Complainant Status in Bankruptcy Fraud Case
This article was discussed in the reasoning regarding the failure of the prosecutor to grant a final deadline extension, although it did not lead to the main order changing the outcome, it supported the procedural irregularity found.
388----------- · vd (art. 92 al. 1 CPP)
Appellant Conviction Challenge for Battery, Threats, and Other Offenses
Cited in the final sentence structure listing applicable articles, related to procedural aspects.
P/2303/2022 · ge (art. 92 CPP)
Detainee's Appeal Against Detention Dismissed Over Disputed Age and Welfare Fraud Allegations
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility for the appellant to request an extension of the reply deadline.
51/2002/2 · sh (Art. 92 Abs. 1 und 2 StPO)
Appellant's Failure to Appear Supersedes Defective Summons Notice Period
Cited to explain the rule regarding service of summonses to a party with a representative versus personal summonses to the accused.
BES.2020.93 · bs (Art. 92 StPO)
Denial of Evidentiary Extension Appeal Moot Due to Transfer to Criminal Court
Cited in the reasoning to classify the deadline for evidence requests as a judicial deadline that can be extended, which supports the view that the extension request should have been granted.
BEK 2019 93 · sz (Art. 92 StPO)
Extension Refusal and Dismissal of Revision Application for Untimely Correction
This article governs the extension of judicial deadlines, which was addressed in relation to the rejected request.
Jug.2018.314 · vd (Art. 92 CPP)
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Untimely Filing of Written Statement
Cited in the operative part, relating to failure to file the reasoned appeal, which supports the finding of inadmissibility.
D.cision.2018.474 · vd (Art. 92 CPP)
Extension of Detention Decision Deadline Due to Transfer Issues
The legal basis referenced in the reasoning for extending a deadline, although not explicitly in the final operative orders (I-IV), is the primary justification for order I, concerning the deadline extension for the lower court.