312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 86 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Elektronische Zustellung
StPO; 2. Titel: Strafbehörden; 8. Kapitel: Allgemeine Verfahrensregeln
Art. 86 StPO · Elektronische Zustellung
Mit dem Einverständnis der betroffenen Person können Mitteilungen elektronisch zugestellt werden. Sie sind mit einer elektronischen Signatur gemäss Bundesgesetz vom 18. März 2016 über die elektronische Signatur zu versehen.
Der Bundesrat regelt: a. die zu verwendende Signatur; b. das Format der Mitteilungen und ihrer Beilagen; c. die Art und Weise der Übermittlung; d. den Zeitpunkt, zu dem die Mitteilung als zugestellt gilt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (21)
ZZ.1979.15 · so (§ 86 StPO)
Investigating Judge's Authority to Dismiss Criminal Complaint vs. District Court President's Role
The core of the decision, establishing that the Circuit Court President lacks the authority to dismiss a case referred by the investigating judge under this provision.
502 2023 195 · fr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 StPO)
Cantonal Court Upholds Penalty Order for Late Objection in Fraudulent Bankruptcy Case
Cited regarding electronic service rules, which the court noted were not applicable as service was by registered mail.
636----------- · vd (Art. 86 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Rejection of Extension to Consult Case File Due to Insufficient Motivation
Cited in the context of the proper form of electronic communication, although the violation was not decisive for the outcome regarding prejudice.
CPEN.2019.75 · ne (Art. 86 CPP)
Detective GPS Tracking Surveillance Conviction Reinstated After Untimely Opposition
Cited in the preamble to the dispositive, this provision was referenced regarding the invalidity of email notification for substantive legal acts.
SB.2018.45 · bs (Art. 86 StPO)
Private Complainants' Appeal Timeliness Following Improper Service
This provision allows for electronic service with the consent of the affected person.
SF170002 · zh (Art. 86 StPO)
Petitioner's Appeal and Disqualification Requests Dismissed Pending Supreme Court Decision
Cited in Order 6 as the basis for the electronic communication of the decision to the applicant.
PM/1093/2015 · ge (art. 86 al. 3 CPP)
Appellant's Conditional Release Refused Due to Unsatisfactory Conduct and Risk of Recidivism
Mentioned as the applicable rule for the next examination of the question if the appellant makes serious efforts during the coming months.
UH140023 · zh (Art. 86 StPO)
Appeal Timeliness Regarding Vehicle Release Decision
Cited in the reasoning regarding electronic service upon consent of the interested party.
CHAC.2008.45 · ne (Art. 86 [CPP])
Speeding Fine Opposition Admissibility
The court determined the admissibility of the late opposition based on the possibility of restitutio in integrum under this article.
RBOG.2006.Nr.43 · tg (§ 86 Abs. 1 und 4 StPO)
Admissibility of Statements Without Full Miranda Advisement
The court considered the provisions regarding the duty to inform suspects during interrogation and the invalidity of statements made in breach of this duty.
RBOG.2006.Nr.43 · tg (§ 86 StPO)
Admissibility of Statements Without Full Miranda Advisement
This provision was referenced as being applicable to police interrogations regarding the duty to inform the suspect.
CCP.2005.72 · ne (art.86 CPP)
Penal Order Revision Rejected for Untimely Opposition to Known Facts
The appeal was rejected because the appellant did not request a restoration of time limit for opposition under this article, as explained in the reasoning.
CHAC.2003.70 · ne (art. 86 CPP)
Public Prosecutor's Competence in Reinstatement of Time Limits for Objection to Penal Order
Cited in the consideration indicating the relevant procedure for assessing the request for relief (restitution of time limit), which justified the decision to return the file.
RBOG.2003.Nr.30 · tg (§ 86 Abs. 1 StPO)
Detainee Compensation for Unlawful Deprivation of Liberty Despite Resistant Interrogation Conduct
This provision was cited in the reasoning when discussing the principles applicable in the criminal procedural context regarding the accused's duty to tell the truth versus the right to remain silent, contrasting it with the standards under §§ 65 ff. StPO for compensation claims.
CHAC.2003.25 · ne (art. 86 CPP)
Improper Service of Penalty Order Justifies Acceptance of Late Opposition
Cited as the basis for granting restitution of the deadline which justifies the annulment of the decision.