312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 63 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Sitzungspolizeiliche Massnahmen
StPO; 2. Titel: Strafbehörden; 7. Kapitel: Verfahrensleitung
Art. 63 StPO · Sitzungspolizeiliche Massnahmen
Die Verfahrensleitung sorgt für Sicherheit, Ruhe und Ordnung während der Verhandlungen.
Sie kann Personen, die den Geschäftsgang stören oder Anstandsregeln verletzen, verwarnen. Im Wiederholungsfalle kann sie ihnen das Wort entziehen, sie aus dem Verhandlungsraum weisen und nötigenfalls bis zum Schluss der Verhandlung in polizeilichen Gewahrsam setzen lassen. Sie kann den Verhandlungsraum räumen lassen.
Sie kann die Unterstützung der am Orte der Verfahrenshandlung zuständigen Polizei verlangen.
Wird eine Partei ausgeschlossen, so wird die Verfahrenshandlung gleichwohl fortgesetzt.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (32)
STBER.2023.32 · so (Art. 63 StPO)
Appeal of Aggravated Assault Conviction, Sentencing, and Deportation Order
Cited in the preamble of the final orders, relating to the determination of the penalty fine (Order 5.b).
ARMP.2023.130 · ne (Art. 63 al. 2 CPP)
Prosecutor's Denial of Right to Practice Overturned Due to Insufficient Justification of Misconduct
Mentioned in the reasoning section regarding the possibility for the prosecutor to issue warnings, although the final dispositive does not directly apply it to order an action, it is referenced in the context where the court outlines alternative means of redress other than the interdiction to practice.
SBK.2023.260 · ag (Art. 63 StPO)
Judge's Mask Mandate Enforcement Upheld
Cited as a legal basis for the court president's actions to ensure court session order.
CPEN.2022.87 · ne (art. 63 CPP)
Disturbance and Disobedience Conviction Upheld Despite Challenge to Parking Fine Validity
Cited among the considered provisions, relating to the judge's powers to maintain order during the hearing, which justified the appellant's exclusion.
BES.2023.81 · bs (Art. 63 Abs. 1 StPO)
Prosecutor's Exclusion of Defense Counsel from Witness Interrogation Overturned Due to Insufficient Risk of Collusion
Cited as a potential legal basis for restriction based on maintaining order during hearings, although ultimately deemed inapplicable as no disturbance occurred.
ARMP.2022.130 · ne (Art. 63 al. 1 CPP)
Appeal Against Procedural Restriction on Witness Questioning in Fraud Case
Cited as the basis for the Public Prosecutor's obligation to ensure the safety, serenity, and proper order of the debates.
PS/69/2022/PS/82/202 · ge (art. 63 CPP)
Prosecutor Recusal Motions Based on Procedural Rulings Rejected
Cited in the reasoning regarding the continuation of the hearing in the appellant's absence, but not explicitly in the final orders.
SBE.2021.61 · ag (Art. 63 Abs. 1 StPO)
Mask Mandate Appeal: Appearance Despite Non-Compliance
Cited as the legal basis for the court's decision regarding the procedural measure of excluding the appellant from the hearing to ensure safety and order.
SBE.2021.61 · ag (Art. 63 Abs. 2 StPO)
Mask Mandate Appeal: Appearance Despite Non-Compliance
Cited as the legal basis for the court's decision regarding the procedural measure of warning and potentially excluding individuals from the hearing.
SBE.2021.61 · ag (Art. 63 Abs. 4 StPO)
Mask Mandate Appeal: Appearance Despite Non-Compliance
Cited as the legal basis for continuing the proceedings despite the exclusion of a party.
STBER.2018.57 · so (Art. 63 StPO)
State v. Defendant: Affirmation of Attempted Intentional Homicide Despite Diminished Capacity
Cited in the overall list of applied articles, likely concerning the costs or procedure.
BES.2018.57 · bs (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO)
Prosecutor's Seizure of Devices and Cash Upheld in Violence Investigation
This provision is the general basis for seizure to cover costs (mentioned in the context of Art. 268).
D.cision.2018.426 · vd (Art. 63 al. 1 CPP)
Prosecutor Recusal Denial Based on Hearing Management and File Access
Cited in the reasoning to justify the prosecutor's actions during the hearing, which informed the decision to reject the recusal request.
60.2017.13 · ti (art. 63 CPP)
Appellant v. Prosecutor Regarding Electronic Device Access During Witness Interrogation
Cited in the grounds for the final decision, although its application was interpreted restrictively regarding an absolute ban on electronic devices.
Jug.2016.435 · vd (art. 63 CPP)
Qualified Robbery Conviction Upheld Despite Insufficient Evidence for Knife Threat Allegation
Cited in the concluding section listing the applicable articles.