Art. 447 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Koordinationsbestimmungen

CPEN.2017.1 · ne (Art. 447 CPP)

Cyclist's Negligence Claim Against Truck Driver Fails Due to Extraordinary Intervening Cause

This procedural article concerning costs was cited in the reasoning but not in the final orders.

AP.2011.116 · vd (Art. 447 al. 2 CPP)

Appeal of Unemployment Insurance Fraud Conviction Reversed for Lack of Factual Basis

Cited to confirm that the reviewing court is bound by the facts established in the challenged judgment, subject to corrections or additions from the file, which governs the extent of the review in this specific procedural context.

AP.2011.68 · vd (Art. 447 al. 2 CPP)

Appellant v. Accused (Sexual Offenses)

This article was cited to confirm that the Court of Cassation was bound by the facts established in the contested judgment when examining the appeal in reform.

AP.2011.45 · vd (Art. 447 CPP)

Juvenile DUI Conviction Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof of THC Level

This procedural provision regarding the scope of review in appeals in reform was cited extensively to justify the court's findings on the facts and law applicable to the reform appeals (points 6, 8, 10.2).

AP.2011.26 · vd (Art. 447 al. 1 CPP)

Public Prosecutor v. Individuals (Simple Bodily Harm Sentencing)

Cited as the procedural basis allowing the Court of Cassation to review questions of law freely.

AP.2011.26 · vd (Art. 447 al. 2 CPP)

Public Prosecutor v. Individuals (Simple Bodily Harm Sentencing)

Cited as the procedural basis confirming the Court is bound by the facts established in the contested judgment.

AP.2011.31 · vd (art. 447 al. 1 CPP)

Criminal Conviction and Civil Award Affirmation on Assault and Traffic Violations Appeal

Cited as the basis for the court's free examination of questions of law in an appeal in reform, subject to the conclusions of the appellant.

AP.2010.283 · vd (Art. 447 al. 1 CPP)

Appeal Concerning Fraud Conviction and Proportionality of Immediate Fine

Cited in the reasoning regarding the court's power to freely examine questions of law in a reformed appeal (though not explicitly in the final orders).

AP.2010.283 · vd (Art. 447 al. 2 CPP)

Appeal Concerning Fraud Conviction and Proportionality of Immediate Fine

Cited in the reasoning regarding the court being bound by the facts established in the appealed judgment (though not explicitly in the final orders).

AP.2010.284 · vd (Art. 447 al. 2 CPP)

Pharmacist Narcotics Diversion and Compensatory Damages Appeal

Cited in section 1 to establish the court's authority to review questions of law freely while being bound by the established facts, which implicitly governs the review process leading to the final order.

AP.2010.288 · vd (Art. 447 al. 1er CPP)

Forgery of Title and Procedural Challenges to Supplementary Sentencing

The court used this provision to assert its right to examine legal questions ex officio in the appeal for reform.

AP.2010.288 · vd (Art. 447 al. 2 CPP)

Forgery of Title and Procedural Challenges to Supplementary Sentencing

The court noted it was bound by the facts established in the judgment due to the rejection of the nullity appeal, pursuant to this article.

AP.2010.275 · vd (Art. 447 al. 2 CPP)

Public Prosecutor v. Defendant (Juvenile Placement Appeal)

The court cited this article as the basis for supplementing the established facts from the lower court's judgment.

AP.2010.286 · vd (Art. 447 al. 1 CPP)

Appellate Court Decision on Criminal Costs Following Fraud Acquittal in Osteopathy Training Case

Applied as the standard for the court to freely review questions of law in an appeal seeking reform.

AP.2011.10 · vd (Art. 447 al. 2 CPP)

Case Remanded for Clarification of Collateral Assignments in Breach of Trust Conviction

This provision allowed the court to supplement the facts established in the challenged judgment based on the case file.