Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
312.0 STPOCPP CH

Art. 437 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Eintritt

StPO; 11. Titel: Rechtskraft und Vollstreckung der Strafentscheide; 1. Kapitel: Rechtskraft
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (478 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 437 StPO · Eintritt

Urteile und andere verfahrenserledigende Entscheide, gegen die ein Rechtsmittel nach diesem Gesetz zulässig ist, werden rechtskräftig, wenn: a. die Rechtsmittelfrist unbenützt abgelaufen ist; b. die berechtigte Person erklärt, auf ein Rechtsmittel zu verzichten, oder ein ergriffenes Rechtsmittel zurückzieht; c. die Rechtsmittelinstanz auf das Rechtsmittel nicht eintritt oder es abweist.

Die Rechtskraft tritt rückwirkend auf den Tag ein, an dem der Entscheid gefällt worden ist.

Entscheide, gegen die kein Rechtsmittel nach diesem Gesetz zulässig ist, werden mit ihrer Ausfällung rechtskräftig.

← Art. 436 StPO Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Geltungsbereich Art. 438 StPO →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (569)

CA.2026.6 (art. 437 al. 1 let. c et al. 2 CPP)
Late Appeal Filing Renders Acquittal Final
Used to establish that the lower court's judgment retroactively entered into force due to the inadmissibility of the appeal.
CA.2026.4 (Art. 437 Abs. 1 lit. b und Abs. 2 StPO)
Federal Prosecutor Withdraws Appeal, Lower Court Verdict Stands
Cited as the basis for declaring the previous judgment final due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
CN.2025.20 (Art. 437 CPP)
Defendant's Flight Risk Justifies Continued Detention Pending Appeal
Cited for maintaining the appellate court's jurisdiction over detention as long as the judgment is not final.
SK.2025.55 (Art. 437 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO)
Defendant Ordered to Repay Full Cost of Court-Appointed Defense
This provision is mentioned in the context of the judgment becoming legally binding.
SK.2025.55 (Art. 437 Abs. 2 StPO)
Defendant Ordered to Repay Full Cost of Court-Appointed Defense
This provision is mentioned in the context of the judgment becoming legally binding.
CA.2026.1 (Art. 437 StPO)
Prosecution Appeal Dismissed Due to Waiver; Partial Finality of Judgment Confirmed
Cited for establishing the legal force of parts of the lower court's judgment.
CA.2025.38 (Art. 437 Abs. 1 lit. b und Abs. 2 StPO)
Private Prosecutor Withdraws Appeal, Original Conviction Stands
Cited to establish that the lower court's judgment has become legally effective regarding the respondent, due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
CN.2025.23 (Art. 437 al. 1 let. c et al. 2 StPO)
Attorney Fee Award Upheld Against Late Appeal and Lack of Standing
Used to establish that Dispositivziffer V. 2 of the first instance judgment retroactively became legally binding because the appeals were not admitted.
CN.2025.24 (Art. 437 Abs. 1 lit. c und Abs. 2 StPO)
Criminal Proceeding Compensation Appeal Dismissed for Failure to File Statement
This provision was used to establish that the decision regarding compensation for legal representation had become legally binding because the appeal was not admitted.
CN.2025.25 (Art. 437 al. 1 lit. c und Abs. 2 StPO)
Appeal dismissed for late filing of declaration.
Used to establish that the decision became legally effective because the appeal was not admitted.
CN.2025.26 (Art. 437 Abs. 1 lit. c und Abs. 2 StPO)
Attorney Compensation Appeal Dismissed for Failure to File Declaration
Cited to establish that the decision of the lower court has become legally binding because the appeal was not admitted.
CA.2025.22 (Art. 437 Abs. 1 lit. b und Abs. 2 StPO)
Federal Prosecutor Withdraws Appeal in Negligent Homicide Case
Used to establish that the judgment has become legally effective due to the withdrawal of the appeal.
BK 2025 329 · be (Art. 437 Abs. 1 Bst. a StPO e contrario)
Reversal of Penalty Order Finality Based on Mandated Defense Counsel Requirement
Applied to establish that the challenged penalty orders had not become legally final, leading to the necessity of reviewing the execution of sentences.
SB240460 · zh (Art. 437 StPO)
Fraudulent Data Misuse Conviction Overturned Due to Inconsistent Witness Testimony
Cited in reasoning section 2 to establish the procedural mechanism for determining which parts of the lower court decision became final.
SB240308 · zh (Art. 399 Abs. 3 in Verbindung mit Art. 437 StPO)
Conviction for Social Security Fraud Upheld, Fraud Finding Overturned
These provisions govern the scope of appeal and finality of decisions, and were used to determine which parts of the lower court's decision were no longer subject to appeal.