312.0
STPOCPP
CH
CH
Art. 42 Schweizerische Strafprozessordnung (StPO) - Gemeinsame Bestimmungen
StPO; 2. Titel: Strafbehörden; 3. Kapitel: Gerichtsstand
Art. 42 StPO · Gemeinsame Bestimmungen
Bis zur verbindlichen Bestimmung des Gerichtsstands trifft die zuerst mit der Sache befasste Behörde die unaufschiebbaren Massnahmen. Wenn nötig bezeichnet die zum Entscheid über den Gerichtsstand zuständige Behörde jene Behörde, die sich vorläufig mit der Sache befassen muss.
Verhaftete Personen werden den Behörden anderer Kantone erst zugeführt, wenn die Zuständigkeit verbindlich bestimmt worden ist.
Ein nach den Artikeln 38–41 festgelegter Gerichtsstand kann nur aus neuen wichtigen Gründen und nur vor der Anklageerhebung geändert werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (267)
TPF 2023 156 (Art. 42 Abs. 3 StPO)
Victim Restitution vs. Compensatory Claims: Asset Recovery and Venue Rules
The official language of a canton is generally not a valid reason for a subsequent change of venue.
BG.2025.71 (art. 42 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Rules Lucerne Competent to Prosecute Sexual Assault Case
This article is mentioned as part of the procedural rules for determining jurisdiction.
BG.2025.72 (art. 42 cpv. 1 CPP)
Jurisdiction over sexual offenses: Ticino vs. St. Gallen
This provision, concerning taking urgent measures until jurisdiction is definitively determined, is referenced in the context of the initial actions taken by the St. Gallen authorities.
BG.2025.54 (Art. 42 Abs. 3 StPO)
Zurich Cantonal Authorities Competent to Prosecute Case
Cited in the context of discussing the conditions under which a previously established jurisdiction can be changed, which is central to the court's decision on the conflict of jurisdiction.
BG.2025.47 (art. 42 cpv. 1 CPP)
Federal Court Declares Jurisdiction Dispute Inadmissible Due to Untimeliness
This article states that until the forum is definitively determined, the authority that first dealt with the case must take urgent measures, which is cited in relation to the duty to proceed and the potential for provisional investigative actions.
STBER.2024.65 · so (Art. 42 Abs. 1 StPO)
Appeal on Bodily Harm and Attempted Coercion Conviction
Cited in the preamble, relating to the final orders.
P1 23 118 · vs (art. 42 CPP)
Constraint for Blocking Vehicle During Child Visitation Dispute
This article concerning the suspension of the custodial sentence is implicitly referenced in order 2 by confirming the suspended sentence.
BG.2025.30 (Art. 42 al. 1 CPP)
Jurisdiction over Psychic Fraud Schemes: Fribourg Declared Competent
This article states that until jurisdiction is definitively determined, the authority first seized shall take measures that cannot be deferred, relevant to the ongoing investigations.
BG.2025.33 (Art. 42 Abs. 3 StPO)
Schwyz Jurisdiction Upheld Amidst Inter-Cantonal Proceedings
This provision governs the modification of a previously established jurisdiction, requiring new important grounds and occurring before indictment.
SK 2024 162 · be (Art. 42 Abs. 1 StPO)
Assault, Threat, and Psychiatric Mitigation in Workplace Incidents
Mentioned in the final order related to sentencing calculation principles.
STBER.2024.58 · so (Art. 42 Abs. 1 StPO)
Appeal Dismissed: Attempted Sexual Acts and Child Pornography Conviction Upheld
Referenced in the preamble, justifying the conditional suspension of the prison sentence (Order 3).
SK 2024 22 · be (Art. 42 Abs. 1 StPO)
Sexual Coercion Convictions Reaffirmed After Partial Supreme Court Reversal
Cited in the dispositive as a procedural basis related to sentencing (suspension of sentence).
SB230211 · zh (Art. 42 Abs. 2 StPO)
Affirmation of Conviction for Multiple Sexual Offenses Against a Minor with Sentence Adjustment
Cited in the context of costs applicable to the convicted person.
SK 2023 448 · be (Art. 42 Abs. 1 StPO)
Appeal Against Conviction for Insult Via Sexually Explicit Video
Cited in the dispositive concerning the execution of the sentence (suspension of the fine).
SK 2023 542 · be (Art. 42 Abs. 1 StPO)
Appellate Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Qualified Narcotics Offenses Despite Undue Delay Finding
Cited in the dispositive orders in relation to the conviction of A.________ and C.________ (though the original order used Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO).